Adding some information, i not familiar with ActiveMQ on SpringBoot, but in
J2EE, there is a annotation to specified the connection factory JNDI name.
e.g
@MessageDriven( mappedName = "jms/notifierQueue", activationConfig = {
@ActivationConfigProperty( propertyName = "connectionFactoryJndiNam
The default value of that property (if it's not set) is
"java.lang,javax.security,java.util,org.apache.activemq,org.fusesource.hawtbuf,com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper"
(see ClassLoadingAwareObjectInputStream.java), and the
org.fusesource.hawtbuf class in question looks like a UTF8Buffer since
that'
Leave the transportConnector's uri property alone as the original value of
tcp://0.0.0.0:61618; that's the IP for brokers to use when talking to each
other, but doesn't play when they're finding out about one another.
The way this is supposed to work (follow along at
https://github.com/apache/acti
Looking at ActiveMQ.Advisory.Producer.Queue.CommandQueue, EnqueueCount is 4,
DispatchCount is 0, DequeueCount is 0. EnqueueCount increments as more
messages are sent.
Looking at ActiveMQ.Advisory.Consumer.Queue.CommandQueue, EnqueueCount is 1,
DispatchCount is 0, DequeueCount is 0. These values ne
Monitoring in JMX, EnqueueCounter is 0, DequeueCounter is 0, ConsumedCount is
0. I can set a breakpoint and watch producers. Debugging, I can see my
producer appear, say it's sent one message, and disappear.
The consumer never consumes anything - never says it has anything waiting to
be processed.
Sorry for the delay in responding.
I've got a number of follow-up questions/suggestions:
1. Can you take screenshots sorted by all four non-percentage columns
(Self Time, Self Time (CPU), Total Time, Total Time (CPU))? The ones with
CPU measure CPU time, while the ones without measure to
I've used ActiveMQ and AWS ELBs, but not the two together, so this response
is based solely on what I know about the two products and on prior posts on
this mailing list.
I don't believe you'll be able to make this work using AWS ELBs. As you
said, ELBs have a pretty simple model of unhealthy inst
ActiveMQ 5.x allows messages to be delivered to local consumers over remote
ones via the decreaseNetworkConsumerPriority property as described at
http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html. JMSXGroupID will not
achieve this goal for the reasons you described.
Also, I dispute your claim th
>From the logs, it looks like it's failing to drop the primary key and then
failing to create it (because it failed to drop it). For now let's assume
that we're ending up in a good place (the table exists, the index exists),
though we may have to reexamine that assumption if we find evidence of
pro
The StackOverflow post I got it from indicated that Microsoft may have
changed their package structure at some point, so the correct package may
be tied to which version of the JAR you use. But I don't have any more info
than that.
On Oct 18, 2017 6:32 AM, "ubaid" wrote:
> that was hell of an an
Hi all,
I have a very peculiar and weird usecase with ActiveMQ 5.13
I have two durable subscribers listening on a *topic*. When a particular
event occurs, I have to invalidate the messages and remove them from the
topic. To do this, I'm using JMX connection and browsing on the topic and
then fr
Hi all,
I tried with the latest ActiveMQ 5.15.1 as well, but I unfortunately get the
same result: it still won't do the automatic clustering, while locally using
VMs this still works.
Thanks,
Jeroen...
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Ok. I misinterpreted the explanations in "Protocols and Interoperability /
AMQP scheduling message delivery".
By the way: the section "Scheduled Messages" suggests using property
_AMQ_SCHED_DELIVERY
which has no effect at all. At least not with AMQP.
Thanks for clarification,
Matthias
2017-10-18
Hi,
I'm using ActiveMQ 5.14.3 in TomEE 7.0.3
I've migrated an old EE app from weblogic to TomEE.
The Topic setup is working perfectly, including message selectors and
forwarding between topics.
Debugging, the queue isn't exceptioning out when sending messages, however
the consumer isn't actuall
On 10/18/2017 11:09 AM, Matthias Hanisch wrote:
This seems to be a qpid problem. I debugged through the code and my
delivery time above gets overwritten.
Currently you can only set it using
producer.setDeliveryDelay(6);
And then scheduled messages work. So sorry for the noise.
This seems to be a qpid problem. I debugged through the code and my
delivery time above gets overwritten.
Currently you can only set it using
producer.setDeliveryDelay(6);
And then scheduled messages work. So sorry for the noise.
2017-10-18 15:49 GMT+02:00 Matthias Hanisch :
> Hi
Hi,
I would like to send a message deferred on a topic (multicast address), but
my problems is that the listener immediately receives the message.
The producer is build based on qpid-jms-client 0.25. I have tried to set
JMSDeliveryTime and/or _AMQ_SCHED_DELIVERY messsage property in the
following
Tim,
Can you help me a little bit more:
With the same configuration and with the change you told me earlier the
connection has been made, the tables are created but I still got an error as
follow:
Could not create JDBC tables; they could already exist. Failure was: ALTER
TABLE ACTIVEMQ_ACKS DROP P
that was hell of an answer
Thank you so much.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Does that JAR contain a class named
com.microsoft.jdbc.sqlserver.SQLServerDriver
as you specified in your config file? Or is it actually
com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerDriver?
Tim
On Oct 18, 2017 2:37 AM, "ubaid" wrote:
> Following are my configurations for SQL server:
>
>
Following are my configurations for SQL server:
com.microsoft.jdbc.sqlserver.SQLServerDriver
jdbc:microsoft:sqlserver://localhost:1433;DatabaseName=activedb
sa
pass@word1
true
21 matches
Mail list logo
