, the browser no longer overwrites the cookies and the sessions
> are not lost.
>
> e.
>
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: David Martin
> Verzonden: dinsdag 26 april 2022 11:01
> Aan: users@activemq.apache.org
> Onderwerp: Re: Artemis Cluster Management UI
>
>
>
One thing that could help a bit would be to bookmark a set of tabs in the
browser but unfortunately when logging into a broker any existing session
for another broker is invalidated. Perhaps there is a broker-side setting
in hawtio to allow multiple concurrent sessions for different brokers in
one
Thanks Clebert - I guess this is related to ARTEMIS-3587 so will go to 2.20
asap.
On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 20:05, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> You should try 2.20.0 that's being released now
>
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 10:11 AM David Martin wrote:
> >
> > FYI found a simi
FYI found a similar issue as the OPs after upgrading from 2.16 to 2.18 -
perhaps 2.18 is better at detecting slow paths, can see some related
tickets in 2.17 and 2.18 release notes.
Turned out to be MiB/s throttling on cloud storage - increasing the
allocation increased the threshold at which thro
2:41, Tim Bain wrote:
> Great, I'm glad you were able to figure it out, and thanks for sharing the
> root cause once you found it.
>
> Tim
>
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021, 5:24 AM David Martin wrote:
>
> > Domenico, Tim,
> >
> > I've figured it out.
>
tered Hawtio's behaviour -
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false perhaps?
Thanks for all of your help,
Dave
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 10:33, David Martin wrote:
> Hi Domenico,
>
> root@artemis-0:/var/lib/artemis/etc# ls -l
> total 44
> -rw-r--r-- 1 artemis a
icrok8s locally but I could try a different k8s next.
Thanks,
Dave
On Sun, 5 Dec 2021 at 13:40, Tim Bain wrote:
> To take the K8s networking out of the equation, maybe kubectl exec a shell
> session into the container and invoke the curl command against localhost?
>
> And while yo
> could you get the artemis etc folder from your kubernetes container
> and share it?
>
> Thanks,
> Domenico
>
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 17:17, David Martin wrote:
>
> > Hi Domenico,
> >
> > Thanks - after further experimentation It appears to be rel
t;0.0.0.0\"","attribute":"AddressMemoryUsage","type":"read"},"error_type":"java.lang.Exception","error":"java.lang.Exception
> : User not authorized to access attribute:
> AddressMemoryUsage","status":403}
mq,monitor"\/>/' ./broker/etc/management.xml
>
> 5) run the broker
> ./broker/bin/artemis run
>
> 6) read the Active attribute
> curl -H "Origin:http://localhost:8161"; -u test:test
>
> http://localhost:8161/console/jolokia/read/org.apache.activemq.ar
;
> 5) run the broker
> ./broker/bin/artemis run
>
> 6) read the Active attribute
> curl -H "Origin:http://localhost:8161"; -u test:test
>
> http://localhost:8161/console/jolokia/read/org.apache.activemq.artemis:broker=\
> "0.0.0.0\"/Active
>
> {"request":{"mbean&qu
Hi all,
I'm trying to configure role access via the Jolokia REST API for the single
attribute "Active" on the "org.apache.activemq.artemis" domain.
I have a user with a role "monitor" and want them to be able to access
nothing but the above attribute via e.g.
/console/jolokia/read/org.apache.acti
> clientID to the same broker.
>
> Regards,
> Domenico
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 at 14:02, David Martin wrote:
>
> > Hi Domenico,
> >
> > OK thanks I'll have a look at that.
> >
> > Was considering writing a plugin to block authorisati
fix this issue by redirecting each client with the same
> > clientID to the same broker.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Domenico
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 at 14:02, David Martin wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Domenico,
> > >
> > > OK thanks I'll
balance incoming client connections according to their ClientID (or other
> connection parameters), see the draft documentation[2] for further details.
>
> [2]
>
> https://github.com/brusdev/activemq-artemis/blob/broker_balancers/docs/user-manual/en/broker-balancers.md
>
> Rega
Hi all,
Puzzled by some behaviour we're seeing on a broker cluster of 3 live
Artemis v2.16.0 brokers hosted on k8s which has an F5 in front of it
terminating TLS and routing to a k8s node port forwarding to an AMQP
acceptor for each broker. The cluster is healthy and has been up for about
2 months
s possible
> > to architect a system to limit the producer when the consumer is behind,
> > I'd be very hesitant to do so, and would strongly consider other
> approaches
> > such as speeding up the consumer or configuring the message broker to
> drop
> > messag
ld be very cautious
> about any architecture that proposed the intentional linking of producer
> processes and consumer processes via a flow control window, since it can
> broaden the impact of problems beyond the process that is experiencing
> them.
>
> Tim
>
> On Sat, Mar 2
Hello,
You could possibly try producer window-based flow control to stop messages
backing up on the queue when consumers are offline (e.g. using an
intermediate queue to store the backlog) -
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/1.0.0/flow-control.html
Dave
On Fri, Mar
gt; >
> >
> > So I think it would be considerable safe to do reconnect the POD.
> >
> > So a damage in the file system or journal after a failure is IMO a
> disaster situation. And for that I can only think of the mirror to mitigate
> any of that.
> >
> >
Sorry, just to add. I could create a kubernetes service for publishers with
affinity to 2 of 4 brokers and another service for consumers with affinity
to the other 2 but looking for something more dynamic if possible, to be
able to scale out seamlessly.
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 13:52, David Martin
Hi,
Looking to host an Artemis cluster in Kubernetes and am not sure how to
achieve full local resilience. (Clusters for DR and remote distribution
will be added later using the mirroring feature introduced with v2.16).
It is configured as 3 active cluster members using static discovery because
Hi Alex,
I'm not one of the maintainers and maybe they will respond.
To clarify, are you asking whether routing high volumes of messages though
a large number of addresses is likely to lead to poor performance versus
using a small number of addresses?
I can't answer that but Artemis was designed
mq-artemis/blob/master/tests/activemq5-unit-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/blob/FTPBlobTest.java
>
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: David Martin
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. März 2020 10:47
> An: users@activemq.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Support for BLOB typ
Hi Tobias,
Is there a specific reason for needing BlobMessage support?
If you just want to send binary messages, including very large ones, both
BytesMessage and StreamMessage are supported.
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/large-messages.html
Dave
VAT Regis
I was just suggesting to check your cluster configuration against the
reference examples, to make sure the nodes are actually working as a group.
Could it be something as simple as the "ha" URI parameter being
case-sensitive? In all the examples it's in lower case, not uppercase as
you have it.
Hi
Have you checked out the various examples for discovery here -
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/tree/master/examples/features/clustered
?
Dave
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 8:18 AM Jarek Przygódzki
wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been experimenting with Artemis cluster. Apparently remote clien
t step is to raise a feature ticket for this?
Thanks again
Dave
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 5:15 PM David Martin wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Having done some analysis I think I need to do the following however it
> appears that QueueConfig is intended to be immutable so maybe point (3)
t; change the code to allow it in certain places like this.
>
> Would you be willing to send a PR with the changes you need?
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:14 AM David Martin wrote:
>
> > Hi Justin,
> >
> > AMQP or Core - can be either
> >
>
> Would you be willing to send a PR with the changes you need?
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:14 AM David Martin wrote:
>
> > Hi Justin,
> >
> > AMQP or Core - can be either
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> &
Hi Justin,
AMQP or Core - can be either
Thanks,
Dave
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020, 11:02 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
> What protocol are your clients going to be using?
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 3:28 PM David Martin wrote:
>
> > Thanks Chris -
> >
; https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/master/artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/plugin/ActiveMQServerConsumerPlugin.java
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 9:59 AM David Martin wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Decided to switch to Ar
Hi everyone,
Decided to switch to Artemis which is not going to be difficult in the main
but not sure of my best option to migrate an AMQv5 broker plugin which
overrides *addConsumer()* to set a new destination and a message selector
using broker-side business logic based on the user credentials.
Hi everyone,
Decided to switch to Artemis which is not going to be difficult in the main
but not sure of my best option to migrate a broker plugin which overrides
*addConsumer()* to set a new destination and a message selector using
broker-side business logic based on the user credentials. It look
No problem - nb it's port 8161 not 8162
From: jb6622
Sent: 03 June 2019 21:56:30
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: RE: Simple high availability setup
Hi Dave,
Many thanks, that's an interesting approach - we are indeed using v5. I'll
look into our load balan
Hi
What version of ActiveMQ are you referring to? For v5, it is possible to have a
load balancer health check http://hostname:8162/jolokia/api on both broker
instances of a master/slave setup - if it receives a response then this is the
master and it should direct all traffic to this node.
Da
I have used QPID JMS as an ActiveMQ client with no issues so would recommend
you persevere with it.
-Original Message-
From: cooshal
Sent: 17 April 2019 13:51
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: RE: Invoking JMS API with JMS 2.0, ActiveMQ and osgi (karaf)
I just had a quick look at Q
A possible option is to use the QPID JMS driver - this is a v2.0 driver - with
Active MQ v5. It uses AMQP to communicate with Active MQ instead of Openwire.
-Original Message-
From: cooshal
Sent: 17 April 2019 08:32
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Invoking JMS API with JMS 2.0, Ac
Hi everyone,
How does AMQ 5.4+ serve websockets clients as per
https://activemq.apache.org/websockets.html, and, how can it be configured?
There is no Jetty webapp for it so there is no web.xml that I can update to
relax the same origin policy.
Thanks,
Dave
39 matches
Mail list logo
