http://vchekan.blogspot.com/2008/08/tracing-in-nms-it-easy-to-turn-protocol.html
Vadim.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:16 AM, mkeenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm still working on what I think is a thread issue in NMS. I see there are
> Tracer statements in the code, but it doesn't look like t
>From my experience, if you write a test case and create a JIRA issue,
then there are good chances it'll be fixed.
Vadim.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:55 PM, WhiteSock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When I use JConsole to monitor ActiveMQ5.1, I find that the
>
> MessageCountAwaitingAcknowledge and
at it and see what's going on.
>
> In the meantime, can you reproduce an error with the code as it is
> currently written?
>
>
> On 10/28/08, Vadim Chekan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I noticed that all over NMS code the Dispose(bool) is implemented so
>> t
Just curious, are all of your sessions, consumers, etc wrapped in
"using" clause?
Vadim.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 7:03 PM, mkeenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm using NMS 1.1 and I *think* there is a thread deadlock issue. I don't
> have sufficient details at the moment, but I'm in the proces
I noticed that all over NMS code the Dispose(bool) is implemented so
that it will call Close() regardless either it is called from
destructor or Dispose().
As result, if it is called from destructor, an object will call its
member disposeOf() when there is no guarantee that this member still
exist.
Sorry, I think I got it wrong. If message remain intact when consumer
disconnect then CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE is honored.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Vadim Chekan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James,
>
> Are you saying that CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE option can not be trusted?
>
> V
James,
Are you saying that CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE option can not be trusted?
Vadim.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:44 AM, James Strachan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/10/28 Eugeny N Dzhurinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I am facing some strange issue with acknowledge mode in ActiveMQ. Afte
Hi All,
If I want to receive the queue in reverse order, does it mean that
I've designed something wrong? :)
I have a transaction in my application which consist of up to 100K
little actions. I want to implement rollback functionality. My initial
idea was to create a queue where I send a "compensa
No, I'm in the dark like you :)
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 2:09 AM, NabiL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks fo your reply.
>
> Can you plz give more explanations.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> vchekan wrote:
>>
>> Same problem here. Perhaps documentation should be updated?
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 20
What is the command to run certain unit test with maven?
--
>From RFC 2631: In ASN.1, EXPLICIT tagging is implicit unless IMPLICIT
is explicitly specified
Filed https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1940 with code to reproduce.
Vadim.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Vadim Chekan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried to google either it is known problem but was not able to find
> my exact scenario.
> So let me know if it is
Same problem here. Perhaps documentation should be updated?
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 2:16 AM, NabiL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What the login/password, i should specify ?
>
--
>From RFC 2631: In ASN.1, EXPLICIT tagging is implicit unless IMPLICIT
is explicitly specified
is "purge" and "delete"
when delete means "delete from memory" but leaves a queue in
persistence storage.
Vadim.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Vadim Chekan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't believe it is just me.
> I've just downloaded act
'aaa' is back.
Could anybody confirm that it is/isn't reproducible please?
Vadim.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Vadim Chekan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, and there are several of them which once created can not be deleted.
> I can reproduce it under linux and w
I tried to google either it is known problem but was not able to find
my exact scenario.
So let me know if it is known issue or I should enter jira issue.
When you "purge" queue from web admin console, it zeroes queue message
counter. But if you have an active consumer at that time which
pre-fetch
e new details. Meanwhile if you can
hint where to set breakpoints I'll be able to debug it.
Vadim.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:47 AM, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The queue isn't mentioned in the activemq.xml file right?
>
> 2008/9/8 Vadim Chekan <[EMAIL PROTE
Hi all,
If I delete a queue, it is back after I restart ActiveMQ. I tried
deleting from admin web console and from jconsole. The same result
Activemq-5.1.0
Pesistence configuration is from the standard config file:
Any ideas what could be wrong?
--
>From RFC 2631:
Waiting in Reader from binary stream: that's expected. Another thread
in dispatcher is normal too.
I think you need to turn on debugging on the client side. See my
article on how to do it:
http://vchekan.blogspot.com/2008/08/tracing-in-nms-it-easy-to-turn-protocol.html
Vadim.
On Fri, Aug 29, 200
I had something similar recently. My exception though was at the client side.
What this exception says is that some operation was requested by the
client which involves connection (as in JMS Connection) which is not
currently registered with activemq.
So I'd take look first at the client and profil
Jim,
> "transport.TcpNoDelayEnabled=true"
seems perfect to me.
Vadim.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:15 AM, semog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I took a look at your changes, and I think they are very good. However, I
> want to discuss some changes I made to them to accommodate some of the
> const
Created ticket: AMQNET-110
Vadim.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Jim Gomes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, good question. This needs to be looked at and verified.
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Vadim Chekan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Apparently Wi
Would it be property of connection or transport?
I thought connection means JMS connection and it has nothing to do with TCP.
Vadim.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Jim Gomes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since I couldn't look at your code because of the license grant issue,
> I looked in to wha
Apparently WireFormatNegotiator checks only magic bytes during the
format negotiation and does not check the version.
So NMS client V2 talks to ActiveMQ V3.
Is it a bug?
394 [-1211205856] INFO Apache.NMS.Tracer (null) - SENDING:
WireFormatInfo[ Magic=System.Byte[] Version=2
MarshalledProperties={C
Actually why GroupID is not in IMessage?
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:22 AM, James Strachan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/8/26 Marko111 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> I have solved my problem with ActiveMQMessage object.
>
> Great thanks for the heads up!
>
>
>> I will agree we should r
Hi all,
I use c# client (NMS) and want to iterate through list of messages
without removing them from the queue. Is it possible?
Also is it possible to get list of queues using NMS library?
--
>From RFC 2631: In ASN.1, EXPLICIT tagging is implicit unless IMPLICIT
is explicitly specified
25 matches
Mail list logo
