Hello,
I tested Artemis as a stanalone broker (the current snapshot 2.5.0).
One program sent a 100MB amqp message to a queue in the broker. This could
be done.
But while the message was delivered to a subscriber Artemis crashed.
The queue was defined like this:
awe.test.q
Yes, sorry for this!
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:48 PM, Timothy Bish wrote:
> On 02/20/2018 11:47 AM, andi welchlin wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I tested throughput of the Qpid C++ Broker (compiled as Release).
>>
>> It was tested on a virtual machine with 15
Hello all,
I tested throughput of the Qpid C++ Broker (compiled as Release).
It was tested on a virtual machine with 15 GB RAM.
First I sent a 100 MB message into a persistent queue. From sender to
receiver it took 16 seconds for one message.
Afterwards I sent a 300 MB message, this one took 12
and queue elements don't support
> wild-cards. Wild-cards are supported in the "match" elements of things
> like address-setting.
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 10:15 AM, andi welchlin
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to us
Hello,
I would like to use queues which are automatically created.
So I tried it out and saw that they are not durable (persistent), which
means a late joiner will not get messages.
My try to configure some default behaviour for all queues which begin with
'M' was this:
ard compatibility:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:11 AM, andi welchlin
> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have configured one queue in Artemis which is durable.
> > I sent a durable message to this queue an
Hello all,
I have configured one queue in Artemis which is durable.
I sent a durable message to this queue and would have expected to see this
message even if the consumer connects later than the message was published.
But this is not the case in my test.
I configured the queue like:
ou quoted sounds like a
> distribution policy configuration option. ON_DEMAND will ensure that
> messages are only distributed to other nodes in the cluster providing they
> have consumers present.
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 2:56 PM, andi welchlin
> wrote:
&
hat's not happening, you may want to
> start a
> > fresh message thread asking your question specifically in the context of
> > Artemis, in the hopes that people who might be ignoring this "5.x" thread
> > might see and respond to a new Artemis thread.
> >
> > Be
Hello,
Let's say a producer sends a message with a TTL to a queue in a broker
network using AMQP.
What will happen when the message is sent from one broker to the next
broker. Is the TTL timer of the message reset?
Kind Regards,
Andreas
ime so it is lost (at
> least temporarily) if that broker goes offline. It's not a cluster under
> the definition we just laid out.
>
> Tim
>
> On Dec 6, 2017 6:36 AM, "andi welchlin" wrote:
>
> > Hello Tim,
> >
> > yes, that was exactly my de
Thank you, Howard.
Created jiira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1542
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Howard Gao wrote:
> I think you can do a jira for this. It surely sounds like a bug to me.
>
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 5:41 PM, andi welchlin
> wrote:
the consumer
message.setAddress(defaultAddress); }*
SimpleString:
public static SimpleString toSimpleString(final String string) {
* if (string == null) { return null; }*
return new SimpleString(string);
}
What do you think?
Kind Regards,
Andreas
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 1
Hello all,
I built active/active cluster with two brokers for my first tests. I can
see in the log that the two brokers built a cluster. After startup
everything looks fine.
I configured one queue and sent a message using AMQP 1.0 to broker1 and
tried to read it from broker2.
But broker2 throws
, since it doesn't have a capacity to do an
> > > active-active cluster, but ActiveMQ Artemis can. Have you looked at it?
> > >
> > > Tim
> > >
> > > On Dec 5, 2017 7:28 AM, "andi welchlin"
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > H
21 PM Tim Bain wrote:
>
> > Not with ActiveMQ 5.x, since it doesn't have a capacity to do an
> > active-active cluster, but ActiveMQ Artemis can. Have you looked at it?
> >
> > Tim
> >
> > On Dec 5, 2017 7:28 AM, "andi welchlin" wrote:
> &
n. Have you looked at it?
>
> Tim
>
> On Dec 5, 2017 7:28 AM, "andi welchlin" wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to setup a active-active cluster of brokers using ActiveMq.
> >
> > But I also would like to connect single ActiveMq sa
Hello,
I would like to setup a active-active cluster of brokers using ActiveMq.
But I also would like to connect single ActiveMq satellite brokers to this
cluster while they should share some queues and exchanges. So this will be
pretty much like a federation between some satellite brokers and a
18 matches
Mail list logo
