; new
> ActiveMQQueue("TEST.QUEUE?consumer.exclusive=true&consumer.exclusiveBackupCount=0
> ");
>
> A consumer that exceeds the backup count will get an exception. What do
> you
> think?
>
> An additional attribute trumps changing consumer.exclusive from bool
>
> That is by design, the doc on exclusive consumers
> <http://activemq.apache.org/exclusive-consumer.html> explains the rational
> and the J2EE use case.
> What is your use case?
>
> 2009/3/23 mffrench
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> There is no excep
do I need to raise a JIRA ?
thanks ...
mffrench wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> There is no exception raised when I open a jms consumer on an exclusive
> queue which is already locked by another consumer ? The second consumer
> does not receive any messages but I would like to g
Thanks for your answer. Would like to know if there is a sense to raise a
JIRA for this ? It could be a good way to simplify the configuration ...
++
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:13 AM, mffrench wrote:
>>
>> About the networkTTL is there a way to set it
Hello,
As you maybe know the future AMQP 1.0 release is out of the box soon
(http://jira.amqp.org/confluence/display/AMQP/Advanced+Message+Queuing+Protocol)...
And as you maybe notice too a famous IT enterprise work now on the AMQP
specification : Microsoft. So it's now more only a redhat businne
Hello,
There is no exception raised when I open a jms consumer on an exclusive
queue which is already locked by another consumer ? The second consumer does
not receive any messages but I would like to get an exception to close it
naturally... How is this possible ?
Thanks
--
View this messa
About the networkTTL is there a way to set it to infinite value ???
Thanks ...
++
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:40 AM, mffrench wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to know if it's possible to configure ActiveMQ to route
>> message
This thread comes from a misunderstanding. Please ignore it ;)
++
mffrench wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I do not understand why the routing is done on the GET and not directly on
> the PUT. I do not see the interest to keep the message in the non final
> destination broker. F
ink this is not an heavy modification and I'm sure it will avoid many
misunderstanding about ActiveMQ client behavior...
++
rajdavies wrote:
>
> Where are you suggesting an exception is thrown with no
> ExceptionListener ?
> On 19 Mar 2009, at 10:02, mffrench wrote:
>
at
org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.readCommand(TcpTransport.java:210)
at
org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.doRun(TcpTransport.java:202)
at
org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run(TcpTransport.java:185)
... 1 more
Thanks for all...
mffrench wrote:
>
> W
/how-can-i-enable-detailed-logging.html>
>
> 2009/3/18 mffrench
>
>>
>> yes my client is connected... and it only receive message (it's a jms
>> listener).
>> can you tell me what options I must set to enable the log level in the
>> activem
o not know how to
achieve this kind of feature ...
++
rajdavies wrote:
>
> You've registered a JMS ExceptionListener with the Connection ?
>
> On 18 Mar 2009, at 18:06, mffrench wrote:
>
>>
>> must add I tested the same code with other queuers (QPID, ...) and
must add I tested the same code with other queuers (QPID, ...) and I get
exception with these queuers ...
mffrench wrote:
>
> yes my client is connected... and it only receive message (it's a jms
> listener).
> can you tell me what options I must set to enable the log level
enable debug logging and see what additional information you can
> gather?
>
> 2009/3/18 mffrench
>
>>
>> Here's my JNDI configuration :
>>
>> java.naming.factory.initial =
>> org.apache.activemq.jndi.ActiveMQInitialContextFactory
>> java.namin
UP
mffrench wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> some times I get an activemq exception (broker side) which appends
> regularly when I do some stress tests (many producers / consumers on the
> broker) and when I do some simple transactionnal tests.
>
> I've some difficulie
UP
mffrench wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I do not understand why the routing is done on the GET and not directly on
> the PUT. I do not see the interest to keep the message in the non final
> destination broker. For me this kind of routing raise some questions like
> :
>
&g
et the exception you
> require.
>
> 2009/3/18 mffrench
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> if I kill ActiveMQ, there is no exception raised to my connected JMS
>> listener and so my client doesn't detect the link is broken with
>> ActiveMQ.
>
Hello,
if I kill ActiveMQ, there is no exception raised to my connected JMS
listener and so my client doesn't detect the link is broken with ActiveMQ. I
think this is a bug which should be corrected. Is there any issue about this
?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/
Hello,
some times I get an activemq exception (broker side) which appends regularly
when I do some stress tests (many producers / consumers on the broker) and
when I do some simple transactionnal tests.
I've some difficulies to reproduce every time nor explain it but you could
maybe help by exp
Hello,
I do not understand why the routing is done on the GET and not directly on
the PUT. I do not see the interest to keep the message in the non final
destination broker. For me this is a problem because that's mean if you have
N nodes there will be N-1 get requests for exampke. But there is c
If I configure any network connector thanks AMQ API or JMX will this
configuration be persistent ?
++
mffrench wrote:
>
> Is there any way to configure network connector through JMX ?
>
>
> bsnyder wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:14 AM, mffrench wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if when I send a message on queue which does not exist
in my ActiveMQ broker where are stored this messages ? Is there any dead
letter queue in ActiveMQ ? How do I configure it ?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/dead-letter-queue-tp22459
Is there any way to configure network connector through JMX ?
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:14 AM, mffrench wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for your answer. I'll try to make my topology thanks your
>> advise.
>> Anyway I've another question. Is
nodes there will be N-1 get requests. But there is certainly
some explanations I do not see.
++
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:40 AM, mffrench wrote:
>
> Bear in mind that messages will not be broadcast around the network.
> You may already know this but I've fo
t activemq). Do I
make a mistake ?
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:40 AM, mffrench wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to know if it's possible to configure ActiveMQ to route
>> messages from a broker A to a broker C through a broker B. I
Hello,
I would like to know if it's possible to configure ActiveMQ to route
messages from a broker A to a broker C through a broker B. In fact I aim to
achieve this kind of topology :
client X (network 1) send Message to Broker C via Broker A -> broker A
(network 1) send message to broker C via
26 matches
Mail list logo
