Hi, we are seeing warnings like:
2020-06-02 12:59:36,954 WARN [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
AMQ14: Destination
$.artemis.internal.sf.replicationCluster.d1c0bebf-a4e4-11ea-a1af-0025b5a00145
has an inconsistent and negative address size=-2,427,379.
since updating to 2.13.0. Can som
Hi, we are getting complaints from our SAN admins that Artemis is using too
large of a block size.
I always take what they say with a grain of salt... but anyway
Is there a way to control the block size when writing data to the persistent
data?
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com
Hi, just wondering if messages travel downstream and upstream (duplex) on a
federated queue?
Our testing shows messages only flow from upstream and we want to be sure.
Thanks!
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
federation works as expected if the address and queue are defined:
Wildcards seem to cause the issue i described:
thanks again!
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Hi, we are experimenting with queue federation to simulate a dmz
configuration.
server1 is connected upstream to dmz server2.
Messages are sent to server2 and consumed from server1.
We noticed that messages are only federated on a new connection to server1.
So server1 clients only get messages