s instead of the term localhost, It could work?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-failover-using-different-PCs-tp4666568p4667078.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta
-using-different-PCs-tp4666568p4667078.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
gt;
> Any other options? How do you implement failover solution in a way that if
> something happens with the master machine, system can go on ?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-failover-using-different-PCs-tp4666568p4666
message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-failover-using-different-PCs-tp4666568p448.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
there any
> other way to set up two stand-alone PC-s with AMQ, a master and slave ?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-failover-using-different-PCs-tp4666568p4666591.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks!
This option is definitely doable, but not the best solution. Is there any
other way to set up two stand-alone PC-s with AMQ, a master and slave ?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-failover-using-different-PCs-tp4666568p4666591.html
Sent from
ow should I configure?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-failover-using-different-PCs-tp4666568.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta
message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-failover-using-different-PCs-tp4666568.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
