It also probably wouldn't be that hard for you to implement a
Zookeeper-based Locker if that sounded more appealing than a SQL database,
since it sounds like you might feel negatively about using an RDBMS.
If you do, we'd love have you donate it back to the community if your
company would allow it
Using JDBC you can get both.
> On Oct 31, 2017, at 4:06 PM, akhil wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone ,
>
> I just had an issue today with the Active MQ
Hello Everyone ,
I just had an issue today with the Active MQ EFS where one of the master
lost its mount and two brokers acted as a master master instead of complete
failover. I have just looked at the pluggable storage lockers but it was all
giving that locks to JDBC stores not the EFS ones . Is
t be found.
Thanks
Mike
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-Elastic-File-System-tp4715818p4723957.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
; > --
> > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> > nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-
> > Elastic-File-System-tp4715818p4716871.html
> > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
omment I made on:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6441
>
> I may know what the issue is. The particular client I am working with is
> running JDK 7.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-Sy
Please take a look at the comment I made on:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6441
I may know what the issue is. The particular client I am working with is
running JDK 7.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave
abble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-
> Elastic-File-System-tp4715818p4716853.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Did a JIRA issue get created on this?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-Elastic-File-System-tp4715818p4716847.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thank you!!! I was going to create one if it had not been done already.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-Elastic-File-System-tp4715818p4716853.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at
Done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6441
If anyone wants to update the ticket, feel free.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-Elastic-File-System-tp4715818p4716851.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User
No not yet, but I will do so now.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-Elastic-File-System-tp4715818p4716848.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ll as restarting all brokers.
>
> Is there any other danger using EFS with RDBMS based locker?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-
> Elastic-File-System-tp4715818p4716712.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
restarting all brokers.
Is there any other danger using EFS with RDBMS based locker?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-Elastic-File-System-tp4715818p4716712.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list
shared-file-system-master-slave.html
>
> So I guess that effectively rules out using EFS.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-
> Elastic-File-System-tp4715818p4716132.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
vemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html
>
> So I guess that effectively rules out using EFS.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-
s failover system are a distributed file system like
> a SAN for which exclusive file locks work reliably."
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html
>
> So I guess that effectively rules out using EFS.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in
ter-slave.html
So I guess that effectively rules out using EFS.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-Elastic-File-System-tp4715818p4716132.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
is -8796093022207 mb, whilst the max journal file size for
> the
> > store is: 32 mb, the store will not accept any data when used.
> >
> > However, this has not prevented ActiveMQ from working as far as I can
> tell.
> > Is it a problem that
022207 mb
> > Store limit is -8796093022207 mb, whilst the max journal file size for
> the
> > store is: 32 mb, the store will not accept any data when used.
> >
> > However, this has not prevented ActiveMQ from working as far as I can
> tell.
> > Is it a problem th
determined size" or change the way it is reported by the OS that they or
myself know of."
The OS in my case was Ubuntu 14.04.
Korny, thanks for the tips.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave
his has not prevented ActiveMQ from working as far as I can
> tell.
> > Is it a problem that "the store will not accept any data when used"?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> > nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-
> > Elastic-File-System-tp4715818.html
> > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Kornelis Sietsma korny at my surname dot com http://korny.info
> .fnord { display: none !important; }
>
a when used"?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-
> Elastic-File-System-tp4715818.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Kornelis Sietsma korny at my surname dot com http://korny.info
.fnord { display: none !important; }
Thanks Tim. I'll get this up on JIRA soon.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-Elastic-File-System-tp4715818p4715867.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
as far as I can tell.
> Is it a problem that "the store will not accept any data when used"?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-
> Elastic-File-System-tp4715818.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-Elastic-File-System-tp4715818.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
26 matches
Mail list logo
