Did you figure out the fix?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-Group-Concurrent-Consumers-Issue-tp2367512p3466386.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
?jms.prefetchPolicy.all=1
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Concurrent-consumers-tp3041439p3043930.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Great. That was it. Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Concurrent-consumers-tp3041439p3043739.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yes - you can have concurrent consumers - looks like you've fallen victim to
prefetch subscription -
http://activemq.apache.org/what-is-the-prefetch-limit-for.html
I suggest you use a prefetch of 1
cheers,
Rob
Rob Davies
follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies
I work here:
the first consumer has its onMessage called. If I don't
start the first consumer's
connection and start the connection on the second, no messages are received
by it.
Is this behaviour correct ? Is it possible to have concurrent consumers ?
For anyone that wants to test the example I have
FO [jmsContainer-84
transport.activemq.ActiveMQMessageListenerImpl.onMessage()] called
2010-05-04 13:17:07,252 INFO [jmsContainer-84
transport.activemq.ActiveMQMessageListenerImpl.onMessage()] called
...
I would be glad if you could give me a hint on how to configure concurrent
consumers properly, thank you.
Cheerio,
Merck
Message
://old.nabble.com/Message-Group%3A-Concurrent-Consumers-Issue-tp27026869p27026869.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
for multiple groups?
Are there any rules of thumb about how to set these properties given
expected number of distinct JMSXGroupIDs, etc?
thanks in advance
-
Ben - Senior Consultant
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/message-groups-with-concurrent-consumers
ed in the queue, new messages
are immediatly rejected...!?
Thanks everybody, if I could i'd throw a round of pints here... ;)
CC
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-%40-the-insiders-about-concurrent-consumers-and-high-watermark-tf4310327s2354.html#a12270700
Sent from th
On 3/28/07, spiderman2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to have a server of several consumer threads which pull Jobs from
various Brokers. However, I want to limit the number of Jobs of a certain
type, that are running concurrently on this server.
So for example, not more than 5 Priority 1 job
pool of consumers to consume N messages
>> with
>> >> the
>> >> 'priority=1' at the same time.
>> >>
>> >> Can this be done?
>> >
>> > The number of consumers (each with their own session) defines the
ty=1' at the same time.
>>
>> Can this be done?
>
> The number of consumers (each with their own session) defines the
> concurrency. Then just use a selector for the priority="1" part.
>
> --
>
> James
> ---
> http://radio.weblogs.com/01120
On 3/27/07, spiderman2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to limit the concurrent processing of messages on a broker which have
a certain filter value.
For example, I only want my pool of consumers to consume N messages with the
'priority=1' at the same time.
Can this be done?
The number of c
I want to limit the concurrent processing of messages on a broker which have
a certain filter value.
For example, I only want my pool of consumers to consume N messages with the
'priority=1' at the same time.
Can this be done?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/
14 matches
Mail list logo