Re: ConcurrentModificationException in embedded 5.5.0 broker

2011-04-22 Thread dcheckoway
Hey, just curious what the strategy for the next release is. I can't use 5.5.0 in production because this ConcurrentModificationException bug (full stack trace below) is causing message loss. Will there be a 5.5.1 very soon, pretty please?! When 5.5.0 comes out and there is a known issue that ca

Re: ConcurrentModificationException in embedded 5.5.0 broker

2011-04-08 Thread dcheckoway
@Gary, you bet: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3276 - Dan Checkoway dcheckoway gmail com -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ConcurrentModificationException-in-embedded-5-5-0-broker-tp3435952p3436324.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing lis

Re: ConcurrentModificationException in embedded 5.5.0 broker

2011-04-08 Thread Gary Tully
I think there is a problem with the way the context is referenced in amq when threads are created, it should do nothing in that case really. investigating now. Can you create a jira issue to track this? On 8 April 2011 12:32, dcheckoway wrote: > Hello, > > We just migrated from ActiveMQ 5.4.2 to

Re: ConcurrentModificationException in embedded 5.5.0 broker

2011-04-08 Thread Geoffrey Arnold
We're having the same issue with SLF4J 1.5.11 (the version distributed with ActiveMQ 5.5.0). On Apr 8, 2011, at 7:35 AM, dcheckoway wrote: > I suppose I should also mention that we're using slf4j 1.6.1. Not sure if > that has anything to do with this, since the stack trace does show it > happ

Re: ConcurrentModificationException in embedded 5.5.0 broker

2011-04-08 Thread dcheckoway
I suppose I should also mention that we're using slf4j 1.6.1. Not sure if that has anything to do with this, since the stack trace does show it happening in slf4j land... org.slf4j slf4j-api 1.6.1 runtime org.slf4j slf4j-jdk14 1.6.1 r

ConcurrentModificationException in embedded 5.5.0 broker

2011-04-08 Thread dcheckoway
Hello, We just migrated from ActiveMQ 5.4.2 to ActiveMQ 5.5.0. So far so good, with one exception (pun not intended). In one case where we have an embedded broker, we're seeing this exception get logged on occasion: WARNING; 08-Apr-2011 11:11:41; tid:45931; TransportConnection stopAsync; cannot