Re: DurableConduitBridge.createDemandSubscription() for queues

2008-06-23 Thread mlukica
rajdavies wrote: > > The current behaviour in networks is correct - in that they are > intended to create store and forward networks, and still send messages > when there are no active subscribers on the receiving broker. > To get the behaviour you require - where messages are forwarded only

Re: DurableConduitBridge.createDemandSubscription() for queues

2008-06-23 Thread Rob Davies
On 23 Jun 2008, at 09:48, mlukica wrote: Created AMQ-1822 for this issue. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DurableConduitBridge.createDemandSubscription%28%29-for-queues-tp17753931p18065021.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. The c

Re: DurableConduitBridge.createDemandSubscription() for queues

2008-06-23 Thread mlukica
Created AMQ-1822 for this issue. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DurableConduitBridge.createDemandSubscription%28%29-for-queues-tp17753931p18065021.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

DurableConduitBridge.createDemandSubscription() for queues

2008-06-10 Thread mlukica
I have the following problem when using network of brokers connected via DurableConduitBridge: - when consumer on (non temporary) queue is created on node1, DemandSubscription is created on node2 (e.g. NC_node1-broker_inboundlocalhost; this is expected) - problem: when this consumer is closed, sub