eed to be
>> >> enabled as the performance of the system decreases dramatically when
>> set
>> >> to
>> >> true. The documentation on it just states that it is a jms
>> requirement?
>> >>
>> >> We have
requirement?
> >>
> >> We have a requirement for no message loss so whichever option provides
> >> for
> >> this we will have to use.
> >>
> >> Thanks In Advance
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
&g
also given that we run in a pure master slave configuration if either fail
could we assume that the disk sync would run on the other activemq instance
(assuming that hasnt failed as well of course!)
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/KahaDB-enableJournalDiskSyncs
that it is a jms requirement?
>>
>> We have a requirement for no message loss so whichever option provides
>> for
>> this we will have to use.
>>
>> Thanks In Advance
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.
The documentation on it just states that it is a jms requirement?
>
> We have a requirement for no message loss so whichever option provides for
> this we will have to use.
>
> Thanks In Advance
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/KahaDB-enableJourna
for
this we will have to use.
Thanks In Advance
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/KahaDB-enableJournalDiskSyncs-tp28176017p28176017.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
