Re: Memory leak when consuming frequently

Amazon MQ is based on ActiveMQ 5.x, but if you're only seeing this issue on Amazon MQ and not on your instances of ActiveMQ then I recommend you get in touch with Amazon support. Justin On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 8:44 AM Kmahesh045 wrote: > Hi, > I am publishing 1000 messages per second and the o

Memory leak when consuming frequently

Hi, I am publishing 1000 messages per second and the otherhand I am receiving the same messages. I am doing this process for more than an hour. While doing this, the memory is increased to more than 2GB. This is happening olny in AmazonMQ meanwhile Active MQ is working fine. I know this is not rela

Re: activemq 5.15.2 memory leak

JdbcMemoryTransactionStore this is the class we see. -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: activemq 5.15.2 memory leak

Hi, Is it new in 5.15.12 ? It seems you are using the JDBC persistence. What’s the persistence adapter you are using ? Regards JB > Le 10 févr. 2020 à 09:50, buccarellom a > écrit : > > Hi, > > with activemq 5.15.2 we saw in the dump analyzer a lot of hashmap. > > > >

activemq 5.15.2 memory leak

Hi, with activemq 5.15.2 we saw in the dump analyzer a lot of hashmap. as you can seee 121,680 entries. Our heap size is 2GB xmx and xms Our jvm is IBM J9 What can I provide as information to get help? Is this a know

Help with memory leak

Hello, I'm not an ActiveMQ expert and I have the following problem. Running a web application in Tomcat 8.x, Java 8, Spring Framework 4.3.18. My web application both sends and receives messages with ActiveMQ, using org.apache.activemq:activemq-spring:5.11.0 dependency. I'm setting up an ActiveMQ

Re: memory leak

Hi, >From the side, it does look like pending messages accumulated in memory because of a slow or blocked subscriber. Since you have heap dump, you should look at this specific TopicSubscription object just to make sure you don't have actually a consumer subscribed to some of your topics, but not

memory leak

Hi, I'm facing a strange memory leak on one of my production environment (others environments are ok) The Environment 1) AIX 7.1 2) IBM JVM 1.7 3) ActiveMQ broker 5.12.2 embedded in our java monitoring application 3) Client are either java client (embedded inside a front offic

Re: Memory leak with apache artemis 2.1.0

the issue is solved in 2.2.0 thanks a lot : <http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/n4729051/MemoryLeaksolved.png> -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Memory-leak-with-apache-artemis-2-1-0-tp4728863p4729051.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User m

Re: Memory leak with apache artemis 2.1.0

rick.reg...@edf.fr > Tel : 01.78.66.60.79 > Fax : 01.78.66.93.47 > > > -Message d'origine- > De : clebert.suco...@gmail.com [mailto:clebert.suco...@gmail.com] > Envoyé : mardi 25 juillet 2017 20:29 > À : users@activemq.apache.org > Objet : Re: Memory leak with apache

RE: Memory leak with apache artemis 2.1.0

d'origine- De : clebert.suco...@gmail.com [mailto:clebert.suco...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mardi 25 juillet 2017 20:29 À : users@activemq.apache.org Objet : Re: Memory leak with apache artemis 2.1.0 Just sent the RC for 2.2.0.. I would appreciate if you could evaluate the release according

Re: Memory leak with apache artemis 2.1.0

ul. 2017 kl. 11.06 skrev Deomisr : >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > With my broker Mqtt configuration, it seems a memory leak appears after >> > 3 >> > days. >> > Indeed the memory increase but each full GC and GC not release enough >> > memory

Re: Memory leak with apache artemis 2.1.0

n iPhone > > > Den 25. jul. 2017 kl. 11.06 skrev Deomisr : > > > > Hi, > > > > With my broker Mqtt configuration, it seems a memory leak appears after 3 > > days. > > Indeed the memory increase but each full GC and GC not release enough > &

Re: Memory leak with apache artemis 2.1.0

Hi, Try 2.2.0 snapshot. A few mem issues has been resolved since 2.1.0. /hw Sendt fra min iPhone > Den 25. jul. 2017 kl. 11.06 skrev Deomisr : > > Hi, > > With my broker Mqtt configuration, it seems a memory leak appears after 3 > days. > Indeed the memory increase but ea

Memory leak with apache artemis 2.1.0

Hi, With my broker Mqtt configuration, it seems a memory leak appears after 3 days. Indeed the memory increase but each full GC and GC not release enough memory. my JAVA_ARGS=" -XX:+PrintClassHistogram -XX:+UseG1GC -XX:+AggressiveOpts -XX:+UseFastAccessorMethods -Xms4G -Xmx4G" se

Re: Artemis: Memory leak while shutting down the tomcat server with embedded JMS server

Hi!! Agreed with Justin about not being a real issue.. Check the last comment here: https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/2522 You could try to put a FastThreadLocal.destroy() on the application exit. Anyway, there are good chances that the memory leak protection (https://wiki.apache.org/tomcat

Re: Artemis: Memory leak while shutting down the tomcat server with embedded JMS server

Thanks for the reply...If there is no memory leak in case of Tomcat shutdown/restart then I am ok with it...BTW can you please point out the sample code\documentation to disable the global thread pools? Note: I am using broker.xml to setup the server and looked at the https://activemq.apache.org

Re: Artemis: Memory leak while shutting down the tomcat server with embedded JMS server

se positive IMO. Justin - Original Message - From: "vishal3007" To: users@activemq.apache.org Sent: Sunday, March 5, 2017 6:08:29 AM Subject: Artemis: Memory leak while shutting down the tomcat server with embedded JMS server I am using Artemis server as an embedded server in my webapp

Re: Artemis: Memory leak while shutting down the tomcat server with embedded JMS server

March 5, 2017 3:16:50 PM Subject: Re: Artemis: Memory leak while shutting down the tomcat server with embedded JMS server On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 7:08 AM, vishal3007 wrote: > I am using Artemis server as an embedded server in my webapp. > The Embedded server is started as spring-

Re: Artemis: Memory leak while shutting down the tomcat server with embedded JMS server

On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 7:08 AM, vishal3007 wrote: > I am using Artemis server as an embedded server in my webapp. > The Embedded server is started as spring-bean as explained in the Spring > Integration examples provided by Artemis. What integration example provided by Artemis? I don't recall any

Artemis: Memory leak while shutting down the tomcat server with embedded JMS server

as failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread: java.lang.Thread.sleep(Native Method) io.netty.util.ThreadDeathWatcher$Watcher.run(ThreadDeathWatcher.java:150) io.netty.util.concurrent.DefaultThreadFactory$DefaultRunnableDecorator.run(DefaultTh

memory leak due to producers increasement

ue is deleted without deleting the consumer... Is such scenario possible? will it cause the memory increase that we see? Is there any way to close such producers after a while from server side? Thanks a lot, fcbman -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/memory

Re: ActiveMq 5.14.1 - Memory Leak?

6 11:36 AM, "Christopher Shannon" < christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: > As far as I know there haven't been any reports or issues having to do with > a memory leak in recent versions. > > How much memory is being used is really up to the JVM in terms of how it

Re: ActiveMq 5.14.1 - Memory Leak?

As far as I know there haven't been any reports or issues having to do with a memory leak in recent versions. How much memory is being used is really up to the JVM in terms of how it handles allocation and GC. The only way to really know if there is a memory leak is to analyze the results

ActiveMq 5.14.1 - Memory Leak?

using Yourkit Profiler (heap space is GC collected correctly). I have also checked the queue status using mBeans, but it looks that there are no messages not consumed. As I am new in ActiveMQ, could someone explain to me why is the memory consumption increasing in time for Broker process? Is i

Re: Potential memory leak with local queue consumer

Thanks, that was it. For some reason, I thought I had to set the element on a core configuration, but I've added that the the JMS configuration and it works fine. Mitchell -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Potential-memory-leak-with-local-

Re: Potential memory leak with local queue consumer

build up in queue #2 since there's no client to consume them. Ultimately I think this is a misconfiguration. Remove the core queue you've configured and see how it goes. Justin - Original Message - From: "mcacker" To: users@activemq.apache.org Sent: Thursday,

Potential memory leak with local queue consumer

objects, one with a consumer and one without. The one with a consumer has retained no messages in the messageReferences queue, whereas the one without the consumer is accumulating messages, and it doesn't look like they are ever getting cleaned up. I'm concerned that this is a memory leak, a

Re: potential memory leak when using STOMP protocol

I have opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-741. I tried modifying the StompTest, but have had too many issues getting Artemis building fully in Eclipse (JDK8?). -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/potential-memory-leak-when-using-STOMP

Re: potential memory leak when using STOMP protocol

: "mcacker" To: users@activemq.apache.org Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 7:08:41 PM Subject: potential memory leak when using STOMP protocol Hi, I have a scenario which looks very much like a server memory leak when using STOMP protocol. I've upgraded (from HornetQ) to the latest Artem

potential memory leak when using STOMP protocol

Hi, I have a scenario which looks very much like a server memory leak when using STOMP protocol. I've upgraded (from HornetQ) to the latest ArtemisMQ 1.4.0, and the same behaviour is exhibited in both products. I have a server with a topic: to which I create a

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

t;>>>> build >>>>>>>>> process? >>>>>>>> Linux 64 bit. I've run: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> configure >>>>>>>> make >>>>>>>> make install &

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

gt;>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> So on Linux the autotools the build process will place the executables >>>>>> in the directory that map to the application being created. >>>>>> >>>>>> So

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

gt;> >>>>>> >>>>> So on Linux the autotools the build process will place the executables >>>>> in the directory that map to the application being created. >>>>> >>>>> So for instance if you want to build the unit tests the executable is in >>>>> >>>>> ./src/test/ and is called activemq-test I believe. >>>>> >>>>> I generally use a build folder to keep the source and intermediate files >>>>> separate, to test and check for leaks I use a process something like the >>>>> following. >>>>> >>>>> cd activemq-cpp >>>>> mkdir ./build >>>>> ./autogen.sh >>>> I get this: >>>> "configure.ac:122: ' is not a type" >>>> Is this a problem? >>>> >>>>> cd build >>>>> ../configure --enable-shared=no CXXFLAGS="-g -O0" >>>>> make check -j 8 >>>> "make: *** No rule to make target `check'. Stop." >>>> [There's no makefile in the build directory] >>>> >>>> make -f ../Makefile also does not work: >>>> >>>> CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh >>>> /home/me/activemq/activemq-cpp-library-3.9.0/config/missing --run >>>> aclocal-1.11 -I m4 >>>> aclocal-1.11: `configure.ac' or `configure.in' is required >>>> make: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 1 >>>> >>>> >>>>> ./src/test/activemq-test >>>> There's no file of this name anywhere. >>>> >>> If you are having trouble try clone the git repo and working with that, >>> I built that code yesterday without issue. >> I've just tried this and I get the same result. I notice that 'make >> check' does not even attempt to build anything in src/test. I wonder >> if it's because cppunit is not installed in a 'standard' location? >> >That could be an issue, you'd need to debug it on your side to find out >for sure. I have built the test programs now and added a test for my case. However I don't see the memory leak being reported by valgrind in the test program -- strange the difference.

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

On 11/26/2015 08:24 AM, spamtrap wrote: > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:06:15 -0500, Timothy Bish > wrote: > >> On 11/26/2015 03:07 AM, spamtrap wrote: >>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:39:53 -0500, Timothy Bish >>> wrote: >>> On 11/25/2015 11:29 AM, spamtrap wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:07:53 -050

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:06:15 -0500, Timothy Bish wrote: >On 11/26/2015 03:07 AM, spamtrap wrote: >> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:39:53 -0500, Timothy Bish >> wrote: >> >>> On 11/25/2015 11:29 AM, spamtrap wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:07:53 -0500, Timothy Bish wrote: > On 11/25/201

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

On 11/26/2015 03:07 AM, spamtrap wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:39:53 -0500, Timothy Bish > wrote: > >> On 11/25/2015 11:29 AM, spamtrap wrote: >>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:07:53 -0500, Timothy Bish >>> wrote: >>> On 11/25/2015 10:50 AM, spamtrap wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:33:38 -050

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:39:53 -0500, Timothy Bish wrote: >On 11/25/2015 11:29 AM, spamtrap wrote: >> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:07:53 -0500, Timothy Bish >> wrote: >> >>> On 11/25/2015 10:50 AM, spamtrap wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:33:38 -0500, Timothy Bish wrote: > On 11/25/201

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

On 11/25/2015 11:29 AM, spamtrap wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:07:53 -0500, Timothy Bish > wrote: > >> On 11/25/2015 10:50 AM, spamtrap wrote: >>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:33:38 -0500, Timothy Bish >>> wrote: >>> On 11/25/2015 05:47 AM, spam trap wrote: > Hi, > > I have the follo

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:07:53 -0500, Timothy Bish wrote: >On 11/25/2015 10:50 AM, spamtrap wrote: >> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:33:38 -0500, Timothy Bish >> wrote: >> >>> On 11/25/2015 05:47 AM, spam trap wrote: Hi, I have the following code: cms::Message *pMessage; ...

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

On 11/25/2015 10:50 AM, spamtrap wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:33:38 -0500, Timothy Bish > wrote: > >> On 11/25/2015 05:47 AM, spam trap wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have the following code: >>> >>> cms::Message *pMessage; >>> ... >>> std::vector propertyNames = pMessage->getPropertyNames(); >>> >>>

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:33:38 -0500, Timothy Bish wrote: >On 11/25/2015 05:47 AM, spam trap wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have the following code: >> >> cms::Message *pMessage; >> ... >> std::vector propertyNames = pMessage->getPropertyNames(); >> >> According to valgrind this leaks memory. propertyNames

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

On 11/25/2015 05:47 AM, spam trap wrote: > Hi, > > I have the following code: > > cms::Message *pMessage; > ... > std::vector propertyNames = pMessage->getPropertyNames(); > > According to valgrind this leaks memory. propertyNames is on the > stack BTW. > > ==27758== 50,039,920 (289,968 direct, 49

Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

Hi, I have the following code: cms::Message *pMessage; ... std::vector propertyNames = pMessage->getPropertyNames(); According to valgrind this leaks memory. propertyNames is on the stack BTW. ==27758== 50,039,920 (289,968 direct, 49,749,952 indirect) bytes in 6,041 blocks are definitely lost

Re: ActiveMQ 5.3.0 memory leak with IBM Websphere 7.0

You want help debugging a memory leak in a version that was released 6 years ago (today, coincidentally)? Maybe someone will take pity on you and help you out, but I'd be surprised. Upgrade to a modern version if you want the best chance of getting someone to help you. On Oct 13, 2015 8:

ActiveMQ 5.3.0 memory leak with IBM Websphere 7.0

Hi, I am struggling with memory leak. Target WAS is IBM Websphere base 7.0.0.27, have deployed EAR that use Active MQ 5.3.0. I found, when i send message by ActiveMQ, It create 'Logger', Jdk14Logger. IBM 'WsLogManager' create it, but it's not garbaged. Let's

Re: Memory leak in JDBC Message Store

lBackOff="true" /> > > > > > > > > > http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"; > class="org.apache.activemq.hooks.SpringContextHook"/> > > > > >class="org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource" > destroy-method="close"> > > value="jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/activemq?relaxAutoCommit=true&autoReconnect=true"/> > > > > > > > > > > > {code} > > Please help me fiund out is it configuration problem or it is really a bug, > because I suffer with this problem for about 2 weeks. > Thanks! > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Memory-leak-in-JDBC-Message-Store-tp4696558.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Memory leak in JDBC Message Store

uot;; class="org.apache.activemq.hooks.SpringContextHook"/> {code} Please help me fiund out is it configuration problem or it is really a bug, because I suffer with this problem for about 2 week

Re: ActiveMQ Queue Memory Leak?

ease the amount of memory to the JVM to 3G, the heap doesn't happen but > the heap saw tooths with a peak of 2.75G and trough is about 2.5G. Trying > to perform a GC in VisualVM doesn't seem to do anything. > > I tried used BlobMessages but the session is proxied so I can

ActiveMQ Queue Memory Leak?

anything. I tried used BlobMessages but the session is proxied so I can't cast the session to an ActiveMQ session. Is there something I am missing to why this memory leak is occurring? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Queue-Memory-Lea

Re: Memory Leak problem after upgrade from 5.5.1 to 5.10

ducer configured for Async Dispatch (104 bytes) -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Memory-Leak-problem-after-upgrade-from-5-5-1-to-5-10-tp4685103p4685201.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

答复: Memory Leak problem after upgrade from 5.5.1 to 5.10

OK，I will try to do this. 发件人: artnaseef [via ActiveMQ] [mailto:ml-node+s2283324n4685126...@n4.nabble.com] 发送时间: 2014年8月29日 10:45 收件人: edwin_wang 主题: Re: Memory Leak problem after upgrade from 5.5.1 to 5.10 It's hard to know what's causing the problem from the description.

Re: Memory Leak problem after upgrade from 5.5.1 to 5.10

It's hard to know what's causing the problem from the description. Can you perform java memory-leak diagnosis? Capturing a heap dump after running for a while, or perhaps two with a few hours between them, and then opening in your favorite heap-dump analysis tool. Yourkit is a go

Memory Leak problem after upgrade from 5.5.1 to 5.10

be successfully released by full GC. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Memory-Leak-problem-after-upgrade-from-5-5-1-to-5-10-tp4685103.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Memory Leak in Active MQ 5.9.0?

called on the temporary destination object. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Memory-Leak-in-Active-MQ-5-9-0-tp4676709p4676725.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Memory Leak in Active MQ 5.9.0?

oad/heapdump-1390484948363.zip> The Object *org.apache.activemq.broker.region.TempQueue* spams the memory. *Start Parameter:* ACTIVEMQ_OPTS_MEMORY="-Xms128m -Xmx256m -XX:MaxPermSize=64m" *activemq.xml* -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.co

simple_async_consumer (3.7.1) causes memory leak

java 1.7, Linux 2.6.18-53.el5 x64, activemq-cpp-library-3.7.1 Thanks in advance! sunny -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/simple-async-consumer-3-7-1-causes-memory-leak-tp4671245.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Memory leak??

I think we will need to see the client code to see if there's anything obviously wrong with the use of Temp Destinations On 29 Apr 2013, at 21:21, SledgeHammer wrote: > Hmm... I switched the response queue to be a "permanent" queue and it looks > like it doesn't have

Re: Memory leak??

Hmm... I switched the response queue to be a "permanent" queue and it looks like it doesn't have the same memory leak issue. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Memory-leak-tp4666300p4666412.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing

Re: Memory leak??

suggesting that I should switch the response queue to be a permanent queue? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Memory-leak-tp4666300p4666407.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Memory leak??

mumConnections=1000&wireformat.maxFrameSize=104857600 > "/> > uri="amqp:// > 0.0.0.0:5672?maximumConnections=1000&wireformat.maxFrameSize=104857600 > "/> > > > > > http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"; > class="org.apache.activemq.hooks.SpringContextHook" /> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Memory-leak-tp4666300p4666398.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- *Christian Posta* http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta

Re: Memory leak??

uot;org.apache.activemq.hooks.SpringContextHook" /> -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Memory-leak-tp4666300p4666398.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Memory leak??

sue guys? > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Memory-leak-tp4666300p4666394.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- *Christian Posta* http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta

Re: Memory leak??

Any advice on this issue guys? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Memory-leak-tp4666300p4666394.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Memory leak??

age in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Memory-leak-tp4666300.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Memory leak ] The web application appears to have started a thread.

I see (lines similar to) the following in my log, everytime, I shutdown TomEE. Am I concerned? Even though it says 'SEVERE', it also says, 'very likely to create a memory leak'. I don't see these threads any longer after I stop TomEE and I don't see these threads whe

Re: [Memory leak ] The web application appears to have started a thread.

t in the log too, when I stopped TomEE (to > deploy new version of WAR file). > > so, I searched google, and found the following, > > > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Old-issue-Memory-leak-after-stop-web-application-in-Tomcat-td4653959.html > > which

Re: [Memory leak ] The web application appears to have started a thread.

About a month ago, I started using ActiveMQ (v5.8.0) that is bundled with TomEE (v1.6.0), and i noticed that in the log too, when I stopped TomEE (to deploy new version of WAR file). so, I searched google, and found the following, http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Old-issue-Memory-leak-after

Re: [Memory leak ] The web application appears to have started a thread.

rts, it´s ok, but when the tomcat > > stop, I see in the console the follow lines: > > > > > > "SEVERE: The web application [] appears to have started a thread named > > [ActiveMQ InactivityMonitor Worker] but has failed to stop it. T

Re: [Memory leak ] The web application appears to have started a thread.

gt; stop, I see in the console the follow lines: > > > "SEVERE: The web application [] appears to have started a thread named > [ActiveMQ InactivityMonitor Worker] but has failed to stop it. This is very > likely to create a memory leak. > Apr 16, 2013 2:43:21 PM org.ap

[Memory leak ] The web application appears to have started a thread.

nitor Worker] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Apr 16, 2013 2:43:21 PM org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader clearReferencesThreads SEVERE: The web application [] is still processing a request that has yet to finish. This is very likely to create a memory

Re: [Old issue] Memory leak after stop web application in Tomcat

t; tcp://foo/15.87.14.93:61616] are still there, but after few seconds, they > are gone around 10:06:44.170 finally. > At the end, FailoverTransport even tried to reconnect...weird. > > I hope there is better solution on this issue. > Thank you again, Gary. > > -- > View thi

Re: [Old issue] Memory leak after stop web application in Tomcat

you again, Gary. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Old-issue-Memory-leak-after-stop-web-application-in-Tomcat-tp4653959p4654187.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Possible Memory Leak w/Temporary Queues and JMX

AM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Possible Memory Leak w/Temporary Queues and JMX could you open a jira issue to track this and attach the mat file? On 18 July 2012 16:47, Mike Pilone mailto:mpil...@npr.org>> wrote: I'm seeing a slow memory leak in our broker process wh

Re: Possible Memory Leak w/Temporary Queues and JMX

could you open a jira issue to track this and attach the mat file? On 18 July 2012 16:47, Mike Pilone wrote: > I'm seeing a slow memory leak in our broker process which appears to be > related to temporary queues and JMX. We had major memory leak problems > before, but the 5.6.0

RE: Possible Memory Leak w/Temporary Queues and JMX

r.org<mailto:mpil...@npr.org> | o: 202-513-2679 m: 703-969-7493 From: Mike Pilone [mailto:mpil...@npr.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 11:48 AM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Possible Memory Leak w/Temporary Queues and JMX I'm seeing a slow memory leak in our broker process

Possible Memory Leak w/Temporary Queues and JMX

I'm seeing a slow memory leak in our broker process which appears to be related to temporary queues and JMX. We had major memory leak problems before, but the 5.6.0 release fixed the majority of them. This leak seems to take about 2 weeks to fill 512MB heap but ultimately it will bring dow

Re: [Old issue] Memory leak after stop web application in Tomcat

iveMQ call AbstractInactivityMonitor#stopMonitorThreads while > Connection#close? > Or anything missing? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Old-issue-Memory-leak-after-stop-web-application-in-Tomcat-tp4653959p4654109.html > Sent from the Active

Re: [Old issue] Memory leak after stop web application in Tomcat

/Old-issue-Memory-leak-after-stop-web-application-in-Tomcat-tp4653959p4654109.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Old issue] Memory leak after stop web application in Tomcat

ackground. > These logs can be found in > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/n4654084/tomcat_log.TXT > tomcat_log.TXT . > > Really appreciated. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Old-issue-Memory-leak-after-stop-web-

Re: [Old issue] Memory leak after stop web application in Tomcat

p://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/n4654084/tomcat_log.TXT tomcat_log.TXT . Really appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Old-issue-Memory-leak-after-stop-web-application-in-Tomcat-tp4653959p4654084.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Old issue] Memory leak after stop web application in Tomcat

I also caught some logs, doesn't know whether it's related or not. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Old-issue-Memory-leak-after-stop-web-application-in-Tomcat-tp4653959p4654076.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Old issue] Memory leak after stop web application in Tomcat

is stopped, these 4 ActiveMQ threads are still running: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/n4654028/4.png Hope these can help analysis. Let me know if any! Thank you very much. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Old-issue-Memory-leak-after-stop-web

Re: [Old issue] Memory leak after stop web application in Tomcat

wrote: > Hi, > > It's old issue, but I still can't or find any solution so far. > After stop my web application, Tomcat told me some memory leak. > I use VisualVM to check, and yes, below caused memory leak. > Does anyone find any solutions? > Can ActiveMQ team try t

[Old issue] Memory leak after stop web application in Tomcat

Hi, It's old issue, but I still can't or find any solution so far. After stop my web application, Tomcat told me some memory leak. I use VisualVM to check, and yes, below caused memory leak. Does anyone find any solutions? Can ActiveMQ team try to solve it? Thank you for any advice.

Memory Leak in ActiveMQ5.5 (Caused by NIO SelectorWorker)

ActiveMQ Version : 5.5.1 Problem : The thread SelectorWorker is not killed after an undeployment. It causes the memory leak after several deployments and undeployments. Is there any fix for this problem? thanks -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Memory-Leak

Re: Possible memory leak

Please raise a Jira for it and attach a heap dump there. Regards -- Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb - The experts in open source integration and messaging - http://fusesource.com ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Fr

Re: Possible memory leak

Le 11-07-13 10:11, Dejan Bosanac a écrit : > can you test the latest release 5.5.0 (or the latest 5.6-SNAPSHOT) and > confirm that problem still exists? I did some tests with 5.5.0 and it still exists. Heavy usage of JMX seems to be the source of the problem. The test I ran consisted of a nagios

Re: Possible memory leak

t the memory usage is going up daily, in 5 days > the heap used went up by 50MB without any changes in consumers, queues > or topics count. I tried to force GC but the memory usage doesn't go > down which is probably caused by a memory leak. > > I've attached screenshots of he

Possible memory leak

the memory usage doesn't go down which is probably caused by a memory leak. I've attached screenshots of heap profiling done with MAT, the first one was done on monday, the second today. The biggest difference between the two days is org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat memory u

Re: Memory Leak In TransportConnector

Brilliant! Many thanks Gary - v5.5.0 fixed the issue. If you have time, I'd be very interested to read the JIRA should you find it. Great work, and thanks for the response. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Memory-Leak-In-TransportConn

Re: Memory Leak In TransportConnector

ain climb when B goes down. > > Questions: Is this a bug?  Is there anything I can do to avoid this issue? > Should my broker configuration/topology be different to achieve the type of > fault tolerance I'm after? > > Many thanks > > > -- > View this message i

Memory Leak In TransportConnector

Many thanks -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Memory-Leak-In-TransportConnector-tp3635116p3635116.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

ActiveMQ 5.5.0 Memory Leak / Spring DMLC

Hi issues with a possible memory leak in ActiveMQ 5.5.0. I've decided to open a new thread but this relates to my previous problem here: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Transaction-not-started-XA-problems-td3565540.html The issue we are seeing is that ActiveMQ (broker) is holding

XA transaction rollback memory leak

We have Glassfish sending messages to an activeMQ topic using an XA Transaction. This seems to work correctly when transactions are committing. However, *every* time we have a transaction rollback we have a slight memory leak from activeMQ. After 1000 rollbacks our 1mb queue memory is full. The

RE: Possible Memory Leak when JMX agent enabled

DOH! I meant to post this to the Camel forum. Sorry. To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Possible Memory Leak when JMX agent enabled Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:06:26 -0500 All: Our production servers are experiencing a fairly severe memory leak - it takes about 12 days to get the

Possible Memory Leak when JMX agent enabled

All: Our production servers are experiencing a fairly severe memory leak - it takes about 12 days to get the dreaded OutOfMemoryExceptions. We use linux (CentOS 5.x) Sun 1.6.0_22 JDK Camel 2.4.0 ActiveMQ 5.3.1 JBoss 4.2.1.GA (I know! It's old.) I've attached two screenprints from t

Senders blocked when temp store 100% and memory leak in temp store

with temp store stats, queue stats and temp store files names and its size. Please let me know any pointers on how to recover from this kind of issue without cleaning tempstore and restart activemq. Is there anyway configuration thru which we can avoid memory leak in temp store. Also let me know if

Memory Leak in 5.4.0

Is there a command line way to read and write the kaha DB? I would like to be able to see what is in the DB, e.g. activemq-admin browse kaha Also some way to delete entries, e.g. activemq-admin delete kaha id=xxx I tried the browse command as specified in the command line to

AMQ 5.4.0 Memory Leak

Over a period of weeks we are seeing a gradual reduction in the JVM Heap available. When I do a bstat I get numbers like: TotalEnqueueCount = 5,070,691 TotalDequeueCount = 5,068,600 TotalMessageCount = 74 Supposedly I should get TotalEnqueueCount = TotalDequeueCount + TotalMessag

  1   2   >