gt; Am I missing anything? or is this the expected behavior?
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-Groups-and-Network-of-Brokers-Still-not-supported-tp4678567p4682268.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
http://redhat.com
http://blog.garytully.com
m I missing anything? or is this the expected behavior?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-Groups-and-Network-of-Brokers-Still-not-supported-tp4678567p4682268.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-Groups-and-Network-of-Brokers-Still-not-supported-tp4678567p4678596.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
uration?
>
> If this is no longer true, then please provide any network of brokers
> configurations that can be used reliably with message groups.
>
> TIA
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-Groups-and
groups.
TIA
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-Groups-and-Network-of-Brokers-Still-not-supported-tp4678567.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.