> the slave configuration!.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5-8-Network-of-brokers-master-slave-configuration-tp4664476p4664600.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.co
sing these network
connectors?.
The network connector I posted, it belongs only to what it pretends to be
the slave configuration!.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5-8-Network-of-brokers-master-slave-configuration-tp4664476p4664600.html
Sen
e master
server, after I bring the master up again, but I seems that the slave
doesn't reconnect with the server for some reason. Does anyone knows exactly
whether this configuration is okay?
Thank you
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5-8-Netwo
lave system can accommodate
> horizontal tiers...sorry.
>
> Kit
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-BrokersMaster---Slave-tf4063571s2354.html#a11546696
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ksu wrote:
Is it possible to have a Network of Brokers where each of the brokers is a
cluster of (File sharing) Master / Slave cluster?
The idea here to to build a system that has good performance characteristics
and can be scaled easily by simply adding more brokers.
I see a couple of po
issues with this and am wondering if anyone has
already tried to build something similar.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-BrokersMaster---Slave-tf4063571s2354.html#a11545494
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
