Re: Poort ActiveMQ Persistence Performance

2008-04-22 Thread vanyatka
c 99000 msgs for 199906 msec. 495.0 msgs p/sec 10 msgs for 204281 msec. 489.0 msgs p/sec -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Poort-ActiveMQ-Persistence-Performance-tp12945570s2354p16825636.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Poort ActiveMQ Persistence Performance

2008-04-21 Thread vanyatka
4 msec. 687.0 msgs p/sec >> 52000 msgs for 75704 msec. 686.0 msgs p/sec >> 53000 msgs for 77266 msec. 685.0 msgs p/sec >> 54000 msgs for 78563 msec. 687.0 msgs p/sec >> 55000 msgs for 80125 msec. 686.0 msgs p/sec >> 56000 msgs for 82016 msec. 682.0 msgs p/sec >&g

Re: Poort ActiveMQ Persistence Performance

2008-04-20 Thread Rob Davies
tp://www.nabble.com/Poort-ActiveMQ-Persistence-Performance-tp12945570s2354p16797097.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Poort ActiveMQ Persistence Performance

2008-04-20 Thread vanyatka
032 msec. 666.0 msgs p/sec 63000 msgs for 94579 msec. 666.0 msgs p/sec 64000 msgs for 95782 msec. 668.0 msgs p/sec rajdavies wrote: > > > So long story short - use the default message store (AMQ) in version 5! > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Poo

Re: Poort ActiveMQ Persistence Performance

2007-09-28 Thread Rob Davies
een the standard Journaling and Kaha? Any guidance would be appreciated.. Thank you, Darrell -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Poort-ActiveMQ- Persistence-Performance-tf4535973s2354.html#a12945570 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Poort ActiveMQ Persistence Performance

2007-09-28 Thread DarrellFuller
o the Kaha persistence. Is Derby the bottleneck with the default journaling? If not what is the difference between the standard Journaling and Kaha? Any guidance would be appreciated.. Thank you, Darrell -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Poort-ActiveMQ-Persis