c
99000 msgs for 199906 msec. 495.0 msgs p/sec
10 msgs for 204281 msec. 489.0 msgs p/sec
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Poort-ActiveMQ-Persistence-Performance-tp12945570s2354p16825636.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
4 msec. 687.0 msgs p/sec
>> 52000 msgs for 75704 msec. 686.0 msgs p/sec
>> 53000 msgs for 77266 msec. 685.0 msgs p/sec
>> 54000 msgs for 78563 msec. 687.0 msgs p/sec
>> 55000 msgs for 80125 msec. 686.0 msgs p/sec
>> 56000 msgs for 82016 msec. 682.0 msgs p/sec
>&g
tp://www.nabble.com/Poort-ActiveMQ-Persistence-Performance-tp12945570s2354p16797097.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
032 msec. 666.0 msgs p/sec
63000 msgs for 94579 msec. 666.0 msgs p/sec
64000 msgs for 95782 msec. 668.0 msgs p/sec
rajdavies wrote:
>
>
> So long story short - use the default message store (AMQ) in version 5!
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Poo
een the standard Journaling and
Kaha?
Any guidance would be appreciated..
Thank you,
Darrell
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Poort-ActiveMQ-
Persistence-Performance-tf4535973s2354.html#a12945570
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
o the Kaha persistence.
Is Derby the bottleneck with the default journaling?
If not what is the difference between the standard Journaling and Kaha?
Any guidance would be appreciated..
Thank you,
Darrell
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Poort-ActiveMQ-Persis