Pure master/slave is departed in later releases and wont get supported any
more.
You should consider other cluster topology.
2013/12/3 赵振华 ZhenhuaZhao
> hi,all
> I’m a newbie in activemq.
>I use active-5.5.5 on rhel5.4 X86_64 in pure master/slave mode.
> I leave mas
hi,all
I’m a newbie in activemq.
I use active-5.5.5 on rhel5.4 X86_64 in pure master/slave mode.
I leave master’s config file activemq.xml the default,and only add the
following after “
On Nov 20, 2012, at 4:38 AM, antlet wrote:
> thanks!
> OK, maybe I should give up the pure Master/Slave, then which way you
> recommond ? I think jdbc + mysql is not a good Idea, it increase my
> system's complexity ,and I dont think the reliability of mysql is better
> t
er service block because the queue limit
I dont know if I explain it clearly ?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/durable-subscribe-with-Pure-master-slave-get-bug-tp4659385p4659552.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
thanks!
OK, maybe I should give up the pure Master/Slave, then which way you
recommond ? I think jdbc + mysql is not a good Idea, it increase my
system's complexity ,and I dont think the reliability of mysql is better
than activeMQ, and it make the system a extra single-point
--
View
you should avoid pure master/slave - and use a shared store in stead. The
pure master/slave support is going away. see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4165
On 16 November 2012 09:25, antlet wrote:
> am I do some wrong ?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
Hello Mike,
5.5.1 or later should not have these problems with pure master/slave setup.
I can also confirm that 5.5.1 and later versions work correctly with JDBC and
shared file system master/slave.
So if somehow possible you should upgrade to the latest version. There anyway
won't be an
ctive ActiveMQ
server failover to the secondary oracle rac server. (I have seen similar posts
from others when searching on this topic).
Any thoughts/tips are welcome!
Thanks again,
Mike (aka patzerbud)
> Subject: Re: pure master/slave question - console of slave shows many pending
&g
Hi,
Message replication should work correctly in pure master/slave setup on a
decent version of ActiveMQ.
5.3 is rather old. Any reason for using that old version?
Also, pure master/slave has some drawback (which are documented). Are you sure
you don't want to use other models of master/
All:
I have configured a pure (shared nothing) master/slave setup (both are running
ActiveMQ 5.3.1).
One of the documentation points for this configuration is:
A slave of a master broker consumes all message states from the master -
messages, acknowledgments and transactional states.
Howev
Got it working from the doco on this site
http://fusesource.com/docs/esb/4.4.1/amq_clustering/Failover-MasterSlave-Pure.html
(I think that's a bit simpler)
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Pure-Master-Slave-tp4264249p4267485.html
Sent from the Act
Hi all.
I'm trying to follow the example at
http://activemq.apache.org/pure-master-slave.html to set up a pure master
slave. I'm a bit confused about the brokers in the xml file. Do I add a
2nd in the example config that comes bundled with ActiveMQ or
replace the ones?
It lists tw
Hi,
Setup a Pure Master/Slave with KahaDB.
After deleting a message previously sent to the Master, I am still seeing it
in Slave.
The expectation was that the message would disappear once consumed/deleted.
Using web admin console:
(1) submitted a non-persistent message to Master;
(2) a copy
If I have a pure master-slave configuration and the master fails, the
recovery is to:
- shut down the master (if it's not already dead)
- shut down the slave
- copy "the contents of the data directory" from the slave to the master
- start up the master
Question 1:
In the data d
isn't an active member of the
network until the master fails.
Can anyone offer any thoughts on the master/slave problem?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Pure-master-slave-duplicates-delayed-messages-tp4212631p4216589.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User
I'm using ActiveMQ 5.5.1 in a pure master/slave configuration. Both master
and slave have schedulerSupport="true" configured.
I submit a message to the master via the STOMP connector, for delayed
delivery (in my case, 5000ms later). The message is accepted, and the
scheduled deli
I have the same problem. Is there any way to get rid of this annoying error
message?. Is this a bug?
cheers
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Unmatched-acknowledge-errors-in-pure-master-slave-configuration-with-activemq-5-5-tp3548344p4176403.html
Sent from
ase). This will be difficult to setup between brokers on different geo
> locations.
> Pure master slave replicates everything but do you really want this over a
> WAN connection?
>
> Typically users set up master/slave on nodes within one geo location and
> connect geo loca
a master/slave solution.
Master / Slave is typically done on a shared resource (file system or
database). This will be difficult to setup between brokers on different geo
locations.
Pure master slave replicates everything but do you really want this over a WAN
connection?
Typically users set
pure master slave. For each location, other location would be a
slave, in a pure master slave configuration.
Does this make sense? Is it feasible with AMQ 5.5.0?
Regards,
Stevo.
.jtp?type=node&node=3799146&i=0>
> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3799146&i=1>
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 8, 2011, at 3:34 PM, Gary Tully wrote:
>
> > there are quite a few issues backing up against the pure master slave
> > (n
raise a new JIRA for this problem?
Thanks,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
On Sep 8, 2011, at 3:34 PM, Gary Tully wrote:
> there are quite a few issues backing up against the pure master slave
> (nothing shared) support, as a feature, it is not getting muc
there are quite a few issues backing up against the pure master slave
(nothing shared) support, as a feature, it is not getting much love.
Most folks use a shared file system or shared db, so shared store
setup so that is where most of the work is focused.
A 2 broker network can give your
Torsten/Gary,
This (thread) talks about the master/slave issue I made reference to
earlier...
-
Dan Checkoway
dcheckoway gmail com
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slave-not-replicating-consumption-with-Pure-Master-Slave-tp3767086p3798603.html
Sent from
I'm seeing some strange behavior with ActiveMQ 5.4.2 pure master slave
setup...
5.4.2 master running on mqmaster01:
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";
brokerName="localhost" dataDirectory="${activemq.base}/data"
destroyApplicationContextOnStop=
thanks for your reply.
I have noticed similar issues while using admin operations using JMX.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Activemq-s-Pure-Master-Slave-shared-nothing-configuration-tp3677854p3680052.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive
if you're certain that the information about
deleted messages don't get pushed to the slave broker.
Torsten Mielke
FuseSource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Jul 19, 2011, at 12:56 PM, jaskaran wrote:
> Its regarding Activemq's Pure Master Slave (shared nothing) configuration
Its regarding Activemq's Pure Master Slave (shared nothing) configuration.
I have made this configuration and noticed that transactions are replicated
from master to salve.
BUT operations done from Admin Tool of master like deleting any message,
removing queue from master is not replica
Its regarding Activemq's Pure Master Slave (shared nothing) configuration.
I have made this configuration and noticed that transactions are replicated
from master to salve.
BUT operations done from Admin Tool of master like deleting any message,
removing queue from master is not replica
Hello dear ActiveMQ community,
I'm trying to configure pure master-slave configuration, but unable to
replicate any queues from master to slave.
Here is what I used in slave config:
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";>
...
...
Everything else is default
Thank you Prasad. It works.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Pure-Master-Slave-config-Synchronization-of-messages-tp3442845p3577243.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
until the failover is complete.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/messages-sometimes-lost-during-pure-master-slave-failover-tp3570898p3572646.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ot;Slave Failed", er.getException());
}
} catch (Throwable e) {
LOG.error("Slave Failed", e);
}
}
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/messages-sometimes-lost-during-pure-master-slave-failover-tp3570898p35710
apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run(TcpTransport.java:186)
>at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/messages-sometimes-lost-during-pure-master-slave-failover-tp3570898p3570950.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
at
org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run(TcpTransport.java:186)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/messages-sometimes-lost-during-pure-master-slave-failover-tp3570898p3570950.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing li
Hi,
I have a pure master/slave configuration. I am using 5.3.2 but have
observed the same problem in testing 5.5.0.
I have an intermittent issue where a message will appear to be successfully
sent (the producer send() method returns without error) but will be lost.
This occurs sometimes during
Hi all,
I'm trying to setup a pure master slave configuration with a
persistent queue, but the moment I put some load on it (about 30 JMS
text msg/sec, no transactions), I get these kinds of errors in the
master:
2011-05-24 21:36:37,008 | ERROR | Slave F
I think your URI is having a timeout parameter of 10 sec...take it out, your
SENDing process will reconnect immediately
default value for that is -1, good one.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Pure-Master-Slave-config-Synchronization-of-messages
:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Pure-Master-Slave-config-Synchronization-of-messages-tp3442845p3447975.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
1
Please help.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Pure-Master-Slave-config-Synchronization-of-messages-tp3442845p3447824.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
without using Persistent Adapter.
-Nag.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Pure-Master-Slave-config-Synchronization-of-messages-tp3442845p3444995.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
cerFlowControl="true" memoryLimit="1mb">
Configuration for Slave:
Please help me set it up correctly.
Thanks,
Thirumal.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Pure-Master-Slave-config-Synchronization-of-messages-tp34
> Thanks so much!
>
> Sharma
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:34 PM, S Sharma wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am getting significant message drops in activemq-5.4.2 pure master-slave
>> configuration. I am testing topics using the simple producer & as
Bumping this request. This issue is hindering us using ActiveMQ in our
enterprise.
Thanks so much!
Sharma
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:34 PM, S Sharma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am getting significant message drops in activemq-5.4.2 pure master-slave
> configuration. I am testing topi
s message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Is-there-a-trick-to-configuring-Pure-Master-Slave--tp29449220p29449220.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I am trying Pure Master/Slave without authentication for learning purpose. It
appears that the slave can not connect to master. I have master 'bkr1' and
slave 'bkr2'. The activemq.xml of 'bkr2' (the slave) looks like:
The port 61613 is
Dienstag, 6. Juli 2010 10:52
> An: users@activemq.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Pure Master/Slave Bug? Expired messages not replicated to Slave
> - update
>
> This looks like a bug, can u open a jira issue to track this. I think
> that audit on TransactionBroker has caused a problem
This looks like a bug, can u open a jira issue to track this. I think
that audit on TransactionBroker has caused a problem before, not sure
what duplicates it is intended to suppress.
Out of interest, what is your use case for pure master slave?
Due to the limitations of restarting master/slave
Update: Same problem with ActiveMQ 5.3.0, current 5.3.3- and current
5.4-SNAPSHOT.
Any ideas?
Andreas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Weber, Andreas, M-ED
Gesendet: Montag, 5. Juli 2010 09:47
An: 'users@activemq.apache.org'
Betreff: Pure Master/Slave Bug? Expired me
Hi,
I use a Pure Master/Slave configuration with ActiveMQ 5.3.2.
Master/Slave both use the same DLQ configuration with:
processExpired="true" processNonPersistent="true"
The normal Master/Slave processing seems to work correctly, actions on
Master are always replicated to th
just discovered another issue with "pure Master-Slave"
in 4 out of 5 test it all worked "by the book" - i.e.
when I kill MASTER, SLAVE accepgts connections and becomes a master...
but tried it out one more tiem and got this
[r...@ip-10-195-225-236 bin]# E
ot; M/S would be that there is a redundancy
(two copies of persisted data)
??
cheers,
O.K.
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> This is true, pure master slave is asymmetrical and it requires manual
> intervention to restore the paring once the master fails. There is an
> option
> on the
This is true, pure master slave is asymmetrical and it requires manual
intervention to restore the paring once the master fails. There is an option
on the broker to have the master shutdown if the slave fails, but this is
off by default. The problem is that there is currently no way to have a
One of the benefits of Pure Master Slave are that supposedly it provides
some "HA" -
namely books, tutorials, wiki site describe that "when MASTER fails SLAVE"
becomes a MASTER
and clients are smoothly reconnected to it via the virtue of "failover
transport"...
Hi Bruce/Joe,
thanks for the information.
Damned, I was so glad to see the start order problem being gone by using
the failover protocol in the masterConnectorURI.
But unfortunately issue
(https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2743) is right, failover
to slave does not work any more afte
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Joe Fernandez
wrote:
>
> Well, I just gave it a try myself and it didn't quite do the trick. With the
> failover, the slave does wait for the master, and when the master does
> start, the two appear to connect okay. However, if you bring down the
> master, the sla
wrote:
>
> Try using a failover connector like this.
>
>
>
> Joe
> http://www.ttmsolutions.com
>
>
>
>
> Andreas.Weber wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> in a cluster szenario we run a distributed application containing
>> ActiveMQ.
Try using a failover connector like this.
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com
Andreas.Weber wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> in a cluster szenario we run a distributed application containing
> ActiveMQ. We configure a pure master/slave, with one cluster host as
> ActiveMQ master (waitFo
Hi,
in a cluster szenario we run a distributed application containing
ActiveMQ. We configure a pure master/slave, with one cluster host as
ActiveMQ master (waitForSlave="true") and another one as slave. All
cluster nodes are started simultaneous (more or less, not really
predictable).
Hi,
In a pure master slave running on the same machine / server, are we oblige
to activate persistence like that ?
Master
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core"; brokerName="master"
waitForSlave="true" shutdownOnSlaveFailure="true" persistent="true&quo
Using activemq 5.3.1 I have two configured to use Pure Master Slave.
Everything seems to work, I can make connections and failover, however the
web interfaces come up blank. I changed the Jetty port to be different on
the slave and I can access boththey just show no data.
Do I need to
Hi,
To generate this error i simply start a pure master slave using kahadb. then
i drop the master part way through processing. wait for test to finish. stop
slave.
remove master data folder. copy slave data folder over (as documented).
start master and slave.
you then get this when browsing
Hi, we are testing Pure Master/Slave component with following configuration :
- brokers are located on Vmware ESX in separate VM.
Linux 5.4.
Active-MQ 5.3.0
master :
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";
brokerName="localhost" waitForSlave="true" shu
[2009-06-15 09:30:06 -0400] [INFO ] org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService
- ActiveMQ JMS Message Broker (slave,
ID:samperman-ws-2401-1245072595613-1:0) stopped
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-pure-master-slave-tp24015184p24034737.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ
Is that with debug or trace level logging on the slave? Full logging may
help here.
What version of ActiveMQ?
2009/6/13 samp
>
> I'm trying to setup a pure master slave configuration. Startup looks fine,
> but if the master stops, the slave also stops. I would have expected i
I'm trying to setup a pure master slave configuration. Startup looks fine,
but if the master stops, the slave also stops. I would have expected it to
stay up. Below are the configs and relevant part of the slave log file. Any
guidance is greatly appreciated.
thanks
sam
Master config:
to look at though.
Gary.
[1]
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/tags/activemq-5.1.0/activemq-core/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/store/jdbc/DatabaseLocker.java?view=markup
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/BrokerService.isSlave%28%29-for-pure-master-slave-only--tp213395
terConnector.
>
> How do I tell whether a broker is a master or not when using JDBC
> master/slave?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/BrokerService.isSlave%28%29-for-pure-master-slave-only--tp21339542p21339542.html
> Sent from the Activ
ing
JDBC master/slave, and this method only checks the state of the
BrokerService's MasterConnector.
How do I tell whether a broker is a master or not when using JDBC
master/slave?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/BrokerService.isSlave%28%29-for-pure-master-slave-only-
Olee wrote:
>
> Hi, I have tried this, before start activemq, I clean up all the data on
> both slave and master, the slave can attached to the master successfully,
> but when I run some client program, the async problem often occurs.
>
> Have you ever use Pure Master/Slave
Hi, I have tried this, before start activemq, I clean up all the data on both
slave and master, the slave can attached to the master successfully, but
when I run some client program, the async problem often occurs.
Have you ever use Pure Master/Slave mode? Is it works? If so, can you tell
me
Olee wrote:
>
> Thanks for your suggestion. I have other questions.
>
> So the problem is due to multithread and deadlock on the slave?
> Do you think pure master/slave is applicable? Or is asyncronization
> problem very often in version 5.1?
>
My guess is that it is no
Thanks for your suggestion. I have other questions.
So the problem is due to multithread and deadlock on the slave?
Do you think pure master/slave is applicable? Or is asyncronization problem
very often in version 5.1?
BTW, in the management web->Home, there are 3 quota usage parameter:
St
Hans Bausewein wrote:
>
>
> See AMQ-1849 and AMQ-1950.
>
>
that is:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1849
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1950
Hans
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Pure-Master-Slave-Problem-tp1985195
Olee wrote:
>
> Dear All:
>
> I have tried the pure master/slave mode following the
> instructions of the official website. However, I have the following
> problem
>
> 1. When I tried the example of producer and consumer(which is
> provided b
Dear All:
I have tried the pure master/slave mode following the instructions
of the official website. However, I have the following problem
1. When I tried the example of producer and consumer(which is
provided by activemq under the folder named "example"),
rote:
I have the same question on it. When I kills slave broker, I
have found
that
the master broker is down as well.
AMQ developer, would you please explain it for us. Thanks a lot.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/pure-master-slave-tp18831368p18845063.html
he slave.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:21 AM, qlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have the same question on it. When I kills slave broker, I have found
>>>>
>>> that
>>>
>>>> the master
ould you please explain it for us. Thanks a lot.
>> >
>> > --
>> > View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/pure-master-slave-tp18831368p18845063.html
>> > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >
>> >
>>
e in context:
http://www.nabble.com/pure-master-slave-tp18831368p18845063.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Open Source SOA
http://open.iona.com
; that
> > the master broker is down as well.
> > AMQ developer, would you please explain it for us. Thanks a lot.
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/pure-master-slave-tp18831368p18845063.html
> > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Use
you please explain it for us. Thanks a lot.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/pure-master-slave-tp18831368p18845063.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Open Source SOA
http://open.iona.com
I have the same question on it. When I kills slave broker, I have found that
the master broker is down as well.
AMQ developer, would you please explain it for us. Thanks a lot.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/pure-master-slave-tp18831368p18845063.html
Sent from the
I am looking at using pure master/slave for redundancy but the following
statement concerns me:
"The master broker will only respond to a client when a message exchange has
been successfully passed to the slave. For example, a commit
in a clients transaction will not complete until the maste
message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Slave-broker-throws-IllegalStateException-when-I-try-to-use-Pure-master-slave-failover-clusting-tp18483621p18483621.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi All,
I am facing the following problem using pure master/slave in 5.0.0. My
publishers push persistent messages to topics. It works well if I have no
durable subscribers. As soon as I add even a single durable subscriber & if
the publishers are pushing > 10 msgs per sec to the broker
Hi Joe,
I am getting the same 'out of sync' exception while using pure master/slave
(5.0.0). Were you able to fix the problem in your case? The problem begins
at relatively heavy load (> 50 clients). The performance keeeps degrading &
finally the system hangs. Any ideas wou
this?
>> Also - can you verify that you get the same behaviour on the latest
>> 5.1-snapshot
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> Rob
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Problems-with-Pure-Master-Slave-in-AMQ-5.0.0-tp15471491s2354p16255627.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
kipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.342 sec
<<< FAILURE!
--
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
Most of these appear to be network related. I am inspecting the hardware to
see if anything is amiss.
~tom
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Async-error-occurred%3A-java.lang.IllegalStateException%3A-With-Pure-Master-Slave-tp15760909s2354p16048129.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
urred%3A-java.lang.IllegalStateException%3A-With-Pure-Master-Slave-tp15760909s2354p15855236.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ing to jump through some hoops to get the issue fixed.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Async-error-occurred%3A-java.lang.IllegalStateException%3A-With-Pure-Master-Slave-tp15760909s2354p15760909.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Could you pro
Is there something I can do to fix this? I admit my newness to the product
and am willing to jump through some hoops to get the issue fixed.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Async-error-occurred%3A-java.lang.IllegalStateException%3A-With-Pure-Master-Slave-tp15760909s2354p157
erify that you get the same behaviour on the latest
> 5.1-snapshot
>
> cheers,
>
> Rob
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Problems-with-Pure-Master-Slave-in-AMQ-5.0.0-tp15471491s2354p15536007.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I've been using ActiveMQ 5.1 on XP and so far it's been pretty steady-eddy
wrt pure master/slave. However, I don't think I've been kicking the tires as
long and hard as you guys.
There are a couple of related JIRA's:
https://issues.apache.org/activ
Hi Joe,
I'm currently also trying to get a stable Pure master/slave up and running
and run in similar problems.
I have tried 4.0.2, 4.1.1, 5.0.0 and a 5.1 snapshot. Neither worked
sufficiently. Pretty frustrating.
After having read your post I tried 4.1.1 again and - indeed the failover
w
s randomization turned on (default) and
> it just so happens to try and connect to the slave first, that connect
> attempt should fail and it will then try the master. However, I am seeing
> different in my tests. The client - producer in my case - successfully
> connects to the slave.
>
and connect to the slave first, that connect attempt
should fail and it will then try the master. However, I am seeing different
in my tests. The client - producer in my case - successfully connects to the
slave.
Joe
www.ttmsolutions.com
alvinj wrote:
>
> I'm trying to create a P
I'm trying to create a Pure Master Slave configuration using AMQ 4.1.1 and a
slightly stripped down version of the default configuration files. (I
originally tried with AMQ 5.0.0 but had too many problems, so I dropped back
a release.) After the Master and Slave seem to start up okay, the s
On Feb 14, 2008, at 12:41 AM, TBuckel wrote:
Hi all,
I am having trouble setting up a *stable* ActiveMQ Pure Master/Slave
topology.
Initially I have tried v4.1.1 which failed with an exception. I
found an AMQ
JIRA ticket which said that Pure/Master slave didn't work in v4.1.1.
O
Hi all,
I am having trouble setting up a *stable* ActiveMQ Pure Master/Slave
topology.
Initially I have tried v4.1.1 which failed with an exception. I found an AMQ
JIRA ticket which said that Pure/Master slave didn't work in v4.1.1.
Ok, so I switched to AMQ 5.0.0, created 2 configs (m
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
