Re: What is the proper way to configure multiple brokers on the same machine in regard to jmx

2016-08-19 Thread mlange
ay-to-configure-multiple-brokers-on-the-same-machine-in-regard-to-jmx-tp4715589p4715652.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: What is the proper way to configure multiple brokers on the same machine in regard to jmx

2016-08-18 Thread Tim Bain
> the conclusion this will not be possible... although it would really be > cool > to have such a thing :-) > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > nabble.com/What-is-the-proper-way-to-configure-multiple- > brokers-on-the-same-machine-in-regard-to-jmx-tp4715589p4715636.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: What is the proper way to configure multiple brokers on the same machine in regard to jmx

2016-08-18 Thread mlange
h it would really be cool to have such a thing :-) -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/What-is-the-proper-way-to-configure-multiple-brokers-on-the-same-machine-in-regard-to-jmx-tp4715589p4715636.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: What is the proper way to configure multiple brokers on the same machine in regard to jmx

2016-08-18 Thread Tim Bain
g to the same MBean Server (or start one, if none is > available)... to be continued. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > nabble.com/What-is-the-proper-way-to-configure-multiple- > brokers-on-the-same-machine-in-regard-to-jmx-tp4715589p4715625.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: What is the proper way to configure multiple brokers on the same machine in regard to jmx

2016-08-18 Thread mlange
abble.com/What-is-the-proper-way-to-configure-multiple-brokers-on-the-same-machine-in-regard-to-jmx-tp4715589p4715625.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: What is the proper way to configure multiple brokers on the same machine in regard to jmx

2016-08-18 Thread mlange
ate JMX connector, trying to remedy this issue. And, naturally it doesn't connect to the mbean server. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/What-is-the-proper-way-to-configure-multiple-brokers-on-the-same-machine-in-regard-to-jmx-tp4715589p4715623.html

Re: What is the proper way to configure multiple brokers on the same machine in regard to jmx

2016-08-17 Thread Tim Bain
- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > nabble.com/What-is-the-proper-way-to-configure-multiple- > brokers-on-the-same-machine-in-regard-to-jmx-tp4715589p4715590.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: What is the proper way to configure multiple brokers on the same machine in regard to jmx

2016-08-17 Thread mlange
I should note the following few things: - Java version is 1.7.0 (openJDK) - ActiveMQ is version 5.14.0 -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/What-is-the-proper-way-to-configure-multiple-brokers-on-the-same-machine-in-regard-to-jmx-tp4715589p4715590.html Sent

What is the proper way to configure multiple brokers on the same machine in regard to jmx

2016-08-17 Thread mlange
otherwise starts one. (Same for the first broker); Is this possible (or are my wishes actually desirable) at all, or not? And how to get this configured properly? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/What-is-the-proper-way-to-configure-multiple-brokers-on-the-same-machine-in-regard-to-jmx-tp4715589.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.