2008/12/9 Dejan Bosanac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Just a minor correction; there is a Java Stomp client now
> (http://activemq.apache.org/stomp.html#Stomp-JavaAPI), but it is mainly
> intended for testing purposes. You should always consider JMS for Java
> connectivity.
Ah great! I'd never seen that
Just a minor correction; there is a Java Stomp client now
(http://activemq.apache.org/stomp.html#Stomp-JavaAPI), but it is mainly
intended for testing purposes. You should always consider JMS for Java
connectivity.
Cheers
James Strachan wrote:
> 2008/12/9 beilschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>
2008/12/9 beilschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi togehter,
>
> for a composition I have to compare different product, among other things
> the product "ActiveMQ".
>
> Now I need a affirmation, that the informations which I found are correct:
>
> -
> - protocol-adaption: with "JBI B
e.
With best thanks,
Arne Beilschmidt
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/basic-questions-about-ActiveMQ-tp20913847p20913847.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
