On Nov 20, 2012, at 4:38 AM, antlet wrote:
> thanks!
> OK, maybe I should give up the pure Master/Slave, then which way you
> recommond ? I think jdbc + mysql is not a good Idea, it increase my
> system's complexity ,and I dont think the reliability of mysql is better
> than activeMQ, and it
er service block because the queue limit
I dont know if I explain it clearly ?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/durable-subscribe-with-Pure-master-slave-get-bug-tp4659385p4659552.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/durable-subscribe-with-Pure-master-slave-get-bug-tp4659385p4659551.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/durable-subscribe-with-Pure-master-slave-get-bug-tp4659385p4659432.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
http://redhat.com
http://blog.garytully.com
