On 27/11/2007, Bas Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 14-nov-2007, at 11:39, James Strachan wrote:
>
> > Compliant JMS providers should preserve the JMSCorrelationID you set.
>
> Clear as a bell, nice, just what the doctor ordered.
>
> Just to be safe, I'll stick with amq ;)
Great choice! :
On 14-nov-2007, at 11:39, James Strachan wrote:
Compliant JMS providers should preserve the JMSCorrelationID you set.
Clear as a bell, nice, just what the doctor ordered.
Just to be safe, I'll stick with amq ;)
Thanks,
bas.
--
bas a schulte - http://
www.connecte
Compliant JMS providers should preserve the JMSCorrelationID you set.
On 14/11/2007, Bas Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i'm slightly confused about jms correlation id. Am I free to use it
> *and* can I expect the jms provider (in this case activemq) to le
As long as the JMS provider is compliant with the spec - they won't
change the correlation id - so you should be save - as long as you
stick with ActiveMQ ;)
On Nov 14, 2007, at 8:41 AM, Bas Schulte wrote:
Hi all,
i'm slightly confused about jms correlation id. Am I free to use
Hi all,
i'm slightly confused about jms correlation id. Am I free to use it
*and* can I expect the jms provider (in this case activemq) to leave
it alone or could there be cases where the jms provider sticks
something in there?
I've read mixed stories, stating that the app can
