Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] £ symbol on apache

2005-10-08 Thread Rob Cross
Cheers Joshua Worked perfectly I owe you a drink ;) Thanks Rob - Original Message - From: "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 12:03 AM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] £ symbol on apache On 10/8/05, Rob Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was setti

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] internal redirect?

2005-10-08 Thread Joshua Slive
On 10/8/05, Octavian Rasnita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it possible to configure Apache to redirect from > > http://www.site.com/ > > to: > > http://www.site.com/file > > but the redirection to be made internally and not by sending the HTTP > redirection headers. > > SetHandler perl-script >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] £ symbol on apache

2005-10-08 Thread Joshua Slive
On 10/8/05, Rob Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was setting up a website on this server and came-a-cropper when i added > the '£' symbol. There is a conflict between the character-set of the document and the charset sent by apache. Check the AddDefaultCharset directive. You can probably fi

[EMAIL PROTECTED] £ symbol on apache

2005-10-08 Thread Rob Cross
Hello every one, I have looked high and low for the answer to this question, and still no luck.   I am running a dual 2.66 Xeon server, with fedora core 4 on and the auto loaded version of apache, which i have just updated when updates have come out.   I was setting up a website on this serve

[EMAIL PROTECTED] internal redirect?

2005-10-08 Thread Octavian Rasnita
Hi, Is it possible to configure Apache to redirect from http://www.site.com/ to: http://www.site.com/file but the redirection to be made internally and not by sending the HTTP redirection headers. (The browser should still display http://www.site.com/) I have seen that if I use something lik

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] only 64k per file downloading from my webserver

2005-10-08 Thread Joshua Slive
On 10/8/05, Ashley Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, yeah I thought there might be a few too many modules. However, > the modules I've got loaded are the default ones I got with my fink > installation - > in fact I've actually slimmed them down a little. Is there an example > config > f

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] only 64k per file downloading from my webserver

2005-10-08 Thread Ashley Williams
Thanks, yeah I thought there might be a few too many modules. However, the modules I've got loaded are the default ones I got with my fink installation - in fact I've actually slimmed them down a little. Is there an example config file I can copy that contains only the bare minimum? Actually

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PHP mystery on new server?

2005-10-08 Thread Joost de Heer
> If is not some extra library or software that you forgot to install, > check the mainframe if he requires something or complain about something > (IP address? Firewall?) Are you using https with a certificate that's been signed by an intermediate CA? One of the webservers I work with had to chan

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] how can I work offline with Apache

2005-10-08 Thread Guenther, Christian
too less information. what kind of problems do you face? Is there some kind db connection? -Original Message- From: Mahmoud Badreddine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sat 08.10.2005 01:54 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] how can I work offline with Apache Hi I ha

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Another Apache error

2005-10-08 Thread Uzo Madujibeya
Teddy,to be honest with you my whole experience with 2.0.54 (OS X) was a complete nightmare. I spent hours chasing issues on my site which were related to a very buggy 2.0.54.Upgrading to 2.1.8 totally resolved any issues my site was havingUzoOn 8 Oct 2005, at 08:42, Octavian Rasnita wrote:Hi, I h