[EMAIL PROTECTED] Config help: PHP as FASTcgi on Windows2003 OS

2007-05-06 Thread hydn79
Problem --- I'm trying to switch from PHP installed as module (Apache) to PHPinstacll as FASTcgi - on Windows 2003 server. I've downloaded mod_fcgid-2.1-w32.zip from (apachelounge) and also just in case http://www.fastcgi.com/dist/ (mod_f

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] single webpage redirect

2007-05-06 Thread Joshua Slive
On 5/6/07, Dave Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You were right, that worked like a charm! Why wouldn't a ServerAlias provide the same functionality? Because with a ServerAlias, the redirect will again hit the same , causing the redirect to applied again, causing a loop. You need the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] single webpage redirect

2007-05-06 Thread Dave Henderson
On 5/6/07, Dave Henderson wrote: > The site2 is working fine and redirecting correctly. It is site1 that > contains the userdata that I would like to "redirect". Just flip site2 and site1 in my description. > I did try to use the > redirect statement on the site1 server, but that didn't wo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] single webpage redirect

2007-05-06 Thread Joshua Slive
On 5/6/07, Dave Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The site2 is working fine and redirecting correctly. It is site1 that contains the userdata that I would like to "redirect". Just flip site2 and site1 in my description. I did try to use the redirect statement on the site1 server, but

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Valid users cannot login with authnz_ldap

2007-05-06 Thread ranpel
require valid-user If this directive exists, mod_authnz_ldap grants access to any user that has successfully authenticated during the search/bind phase. Requires that mod_authz_user be loaded and that the AuthzLDAPAuthoritative directive be set to off. ranpel wrote: > > Hi > > For auth_basic

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Valid users cannot login with authnz_ldap

2007-05-06 Thread ranpel
Hi For auth_basic you must set -> AuthzLDAPAuthoritative on to AuthzLDAPAuthoritative off Have fun, \r mxc wrote: > > It appears that this guy had the same problem but no solution was given :( > > http://groups.google.co.za/group/comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix/browse_thread/thread/3d8f

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] single webpage redirect

2007-05-06 Thread Dave Henderson
On 5/6/07, Dave Henderson wrote: > Guys, > > I have another question. This one is just to maintain uniformity and is > not a must. I adjusted the apache server that doesn't contain the user > database (site2) to use the database at site1 by redirecting the login.html > to login.server.com.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] single webpage redirect

2007-05-06 Thread Joshua Slive
On 5/6/07, Dave Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Guys, I have another question. This one is just to maintain uniformity and is not a must. I adjusted the apache server that doesn't contain the user database (site2) to use the database at site1 by redirecting the login.html to login.ser

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] single webpage redirect

2007-05-06 Thread Dave Henderson
Guys, I have another question. This one is just to maintain uniformity and is not a must. I adjusted the apache server that doesn't contain the user database (site2) to use the database at site1 by redirecting the login.html to login.server.com. This is working just fine when people acce

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unwanted URL rewriting - apache replaces server name with ip in address bar

2007-05-06 Thread akhayyami
I have a problem with one of my servers; When I enter http://www.myserver.com in address bar (IE & Firefox), apache replaces the server name (e.g. www.myserver.com) with an ip address. I tried with & without virtual hosts but no chance. I also tried UseCanonicalName with yes & no. How can I disa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] single webpage redirect

2007-05-06 Thread Dave Henderson
Thanks Joshua and The Gaijin. I ended up using Joshua's suggestion (I also had to modify my dns settings), but it worked beautifully. Thanks again! Dave Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/5/07, The Gaijin wrote: > > RewriteEngine On > RewriteRule /login.html http://other.server.dom

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIfferences between and

2007-05-06 Thread Joshua Slive
On 5/6/07, Alain Roger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: thanks a lot for your information. Now it's clear. I suppose that if is used before module loading, it has no effect, isn't it ? Right. - The official User-To-User support fo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIfferences between and

2007-05-06 Thread Alain Roger
thanks a lot for your information. Now it's clear. I suppose that if is used before module loading, it has no effect, isn't it ? Al. On 5/6/07, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/6/07, Alain Roger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Under Apache 2.0.x, i've seen quite huge use of

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIfferences between and

2007-05-06 Thread Joshua Slive
On 5/6/07, Alain Roger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Under Apache 2.0.x, i've seen quite huge use of to define something only if SSL is activated. However, it seems that under Apache 2.2.x, is mostly use. From my point of view, both tell the same thing, so where is the difference ? thanks a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to dsiplay photo from cgi-bin

2007-05-06 Thread Joshua Slive
On 5/6/07, Can Le <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2. Link suggested: Alias /cgi-bin /var/www/cgi-bin AddHandler cgi-script cgi pl Options ExecCGI Should I add .jpg after "cgi pl " as "cgi pl jpg " No. That is exactly the point: you DON'T want jpg to be treated as a cgi-script. or add image

[EMAIL PROTECTED] DIfferences between and

2007-05-06 Thread Alain Roger
Hi, Under Apache 2.0.x, i've seen quite huge use of to define something only if SSL is activated. However, it seems that under Apache 2.2.x, is mostly use. From my point of view, both tell the same thing, so where is the difference ? thanks a lot -- Alain ---