Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_authn_dbd

2007-05-27 Thread Vincent Bray
On 28/05/07, Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'll take a look, but this is a long ways from what I would expect from debian-stable packaging... Debian may have better tools for this job such as apt-cache search , but I don't use that distro so good luck :) -- noodl

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RBL Access Controls for Apache 2.2.x

2007-05-27 Thread Vincent Bray
On 28/05/07, Scott Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What are the typical approaches to implementing RBL access control in 2.2.x? We've been running 1.3.x with Brian Bruns' mod_access_rbl module. It's worked extremely well. I've found no literature indicating that it will run properly, or even c

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_authn_dbd

2007-05-27 Thread Tom Allison
Vincent Bray wrote: On 28/05/07, Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I loaded 'DBDriver pgsql' and other Directives in httpd.conf and apache2ctl immediately complained that there was no such thing understood. I checked to see that the module was loaded, it was. You need to make sure libapr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache sending back incorrect Content-length and Content-type values for ErrorDocument

2007-05-27 Thread Bob Kline
Joshua Slive wrote: In the case of this particular bug, if you look at the developer's list, you'll see lots of action happening, including a fix on trunk and a proposal to backport to 2.2. Excellent news, thanks! And thanks for the tip on where to *really* find information on the Apache bug

[EMAIL PROTECTED] RBL Access Controls for Apache 2.2.x

2007-05-27 Thread Scott Jordan
What are the typical approaches to implementing RBL access control in 2.2.x? We've been running 1.3.x with Brian Bruns' mod_access_rbl module. It's worked extremely well. I've found no literature indicating that it will run properly, or even compile, in 2.2.x (No, haven't tried it yet - wanted to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_authn_dbd

2007-05-27 Thread Vincent Bray
On 28/05/07, Vincent Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 28/05/07, Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I loaded 'DBDriver pgsql' and other Directives in httpd.conf > and apache2ctl immediately complained that there was no such thing > understood. > I checked to see that the module was loaded,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_authn_dbd

2007-05-27 Thread Vincent Bray
On 28/05/07, Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I loaded 'DBDriver pgsql' and other Directives in httpd.conf and apache2ctl immediately complained that there was no such thing understood. I checked to see that the module was loaded, it was. You need to make sure libaprutil has the appropria

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_authn_dbd

2007-05-27 Thread Tom Allison
I tried to set up this module with posgresql as my SQL database. I loaded 'DBDriver pgsql' and other Directives in httpd.conf and apache2ctl immediately complained that there was no such thing understood. I checked to see that the module was loaded, it was. Since this appears to be "step #1"

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Explorer 7 only downloads half of file

2007-05-27 Thread ahlist
Hello, Is anyone familiar with an issue where Internet Explorer will only download approx half of a file from Apache 1.3.x servers? A client has the same file loaded on our apache servers and his own server. On ours it downloads (with out reporting an error) approx 400k of an 800k file. The file

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache sending back incorrect Content-length and Content-type values for ErrorDocument

2007-05-27 Thread Joshua Slive
On 5/27/07, Bob Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bob Kline wrote: > On 2/25/2007 11:14 AM, [some other] Bob wrote: >> Take a look at PR 39710 >> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39710), this seems >> to be quite similar to me. >> > > Yes, thanks, this does look the same problem.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache sending back incorrect Content-length and Content-type values for ErrorDocument

2007-05-27 Thread Bob Kline
Bob Kline wrote: On 2/25/2007 11:14 AM, [some other] Bob wrote: Take a look at PR 39710 (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39710), this seems to be quite similar to me. Yes, thanks, this does look the same problem. I've been trying to channel the follow-on communicatio