All my problems seem to point back to RHEL4. I got mod_proxy_html ver 3
compiled and when I try to run it it complains that I don't have
glibc2.4. This is the same error message as I get when I try to load
mod_security 2.
I called RH support and they told me that the functionality of 2.4 is
upda
I have solved the problem myself. It was again not reading the manuals
precisely enough. PT option to RewriteRule does the trick.
Sorry to have trashing the mailing list with problem I should have
solved by myself.
Marko
-Original Message-
From: Marko Hrastovec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
I filed in the bug report number 43128
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43128) and I was
redirected to this list to get help although I still think this is bug
and
should be fixed.
Here is what bothers me.
We are using rewrite rules on PHP sites to simulate user friendly ur
Duh thanks Joshua that would be the place to look eh?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 12:50 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod-charset-lite filter name
On 8/15/0
On 8/15/07, Jeff Murch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I am trying to add the following functionality to my reverse proxy to enable
> the charset-lite filter. The module name is mod_charset_lite but I don't
> know how to identify the 'common name' for it to enable it as a filter.
>
>
>
>
>
> L
I am trying to add the following functionality to my reverse proxy to enable
the charset-lite filter. The module name is mod_charset_lite but I don't
know how to identify the 'common name' for it to enable it as a filter.
LoadFile /usr/lib/libxml2.so
LoadModule proxy_html_module modules/mod
On 16/08/07, robert mena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a centos 4.5 server with apache 2.0.52-32.3 and 50+ domains hosted
> (all virtual hosts).
>
> I have a problem determining which virtual host is causing me trouble
> (either due to bandwidth or processor usage).
>
> My regular too
Hi,
I have a centos 4.5 server with apache 2.0.52-32.3 and 50+ domains hosted
(all virtual hosts).
I have a problem determining which virtual host is causing me trouble
(either due to bandwidth or processor usage).
My regular tools (iptraf, tcpdump) do not help with the virtual host part
since a
I'm asking my system admin to setup some sort of trace right now. We don't
have a DNS service on our own system, so tracing that will be a little
tricky, I think.
I may see if we can run our own caching DNS, if only for a while.
On 15/08/07, Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you trace w
Vincent, Thank you.
We use both "Allow" and "Deny", but only with numerical addresses or subnet
masks.
--
Steve Swift
http://www.swiftys.org.uk
Steve Swift wrote:
> We don't use reverse DNS in our error logs, so I'm wondering what else
> might be calling on DNS services?
>
> We've now fixed the DNS issues, so this is something of an
> intellectual exercise, but there is always the response time bonus of
> eliminating the DNS calls to con
On 15/08/07, Steve Swift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> During a period of apalling DNS response times we became aware that our CGI
> scripts were suffering an intermittent ~25 second delay between the browser
> "Click" and the CGI starting execution. This seemed to be caused by DNS
> lookups.
>
> We
During a period of apalling DNS response times we became aware that our CGI
scripts were suffering an intermittent ~25 second delay between the browser
"Click" and the CGI starting execution. This seemed to be caused by DNS
lookups.
We don't use reverse DNS in our error logs, so I'm wondering what
13 matches
Mail list logo
