[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Large POSTs through Apache reverse proxy to mongrel (Rails) failing

2007-09-02 Thread Clifford Heath
Clifford Heath wrote: Thanks both. I'll have to negotiate with some of the other users to install a custom Apache, as Ubuntu doesn't have 2.2 available Unfortunately there's no easy way to install Apache 2.2 on Ubuntu dapper. It requires a backport of at least 20 packages. Someone's done it for

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Large POSTs through Apache reverse proxy to mongrel (Rails) failing

2007-09-02 Thread Clifford Heath
Thanks both. I'll have to negotiate with some of the other users to install a custom Apache, as Ubuntu doesn't have 2.2 available yet (though I did upgrade to the latest 2.0 - no luck). Or does Ubuntu have equivalent to Debian's "unstable"? Vincent Bray wrote: [About send-chunks...] It appears t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Large POSTs through Apache reverse proxy to mongrel (Rails) failing

2007-09-02 Thread Vincent Bray
On 02/09/07, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But I don't think that's supported in 2.0. Upgrade to 2.2 > for a lot of proxy fixes. It appears to be supported in 2.0 but isn't documented in that branch. See: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43183 -- noodl ---

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Large POSTs through Apache reverse proxy to mongrel (Rails) failing

2007-09-02 Thread Nick Kew
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 18:27:02 +1000 Clifford Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SetEnv proxy-sendchunked should read proxy-sendchunks (it's a typo in the code). But I don't think that's supported in 2.0. Upgrade to 2.2 for a lot of proxy fixes. -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Large POSTs through Apache reverse proxy to mongrel (Rails) failing

2007-09-02 Thread Clifford Heath
I have an Apache2.0.55 server under Ubuntu, serving multiple VHosts, with a reverse proxy that redirects a top-level directory of one of the sites to a Rails application running mongrel. The mongrel is started using --prefix=top_level_dir, and most of this Rails app works fine. One of my forms ex

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disabling basic authen tication for only one directory -- possible?

2007-09-02 Thread jbeall
Joshua Slive-2 wrote: > > Try here: > http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/BypassAuthenticationOrAuthorizationRequirements > > Joshua. That did it it! Thanks Joshua. JFYI here's what I put in my .htaccess in order to bypass authentication: Allow from all Satisfy any -Josh -- View this message

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Strange interaction between mod_rewrite and mod_jk

2007-09-02 Thread Alan Chandler
On Monday 27 Aug 2007, Frank Arensmeier wrote: > Hello Alan. > > First I might say that I've never worked with Tomtact. However, > looking at the response from your server (which is "HTTP/1.x 400 No > Host matches server name www.chandlerfamily.org.uk") you might get > some ideas here: > Can someo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.4 [an error occurred while processing this directive]

2007-09-02 Thread Alex Ctoon
Hi, Malcolm! Yesterday I had download Apache 2.2.4. and now I have the same problem. I can see my local site, but SSI does not work. Are you resolve this problem? Alex -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Apache-2.2.4--an-error-occurred-while-processing-this-directive--tf4360