You are correct. Basic account using one of their domains is free. But,
custom dns is charged for now (didn't used to be) which means you can
use your own domain name. This may be better if you're thinking of email
as well.
Mark A. Craig wrote:
DynDNS does not charge for a basic account. They
When I run an apachectl configtest, I get the errors below regarding compiling
apache with -DEAPI. Apche has an option "--disable-rule=EAPI=no", and I also
tried --enable-rule=EAPI=no. Oddly, when I run make in the apache_1.3.33
directory, I see the -DEAPI being passed to the compiler. Yet st
DynDNS does not charge for a basic account. They have "value added" services
for which they do ask compensation, though. I have a DynDNS account that I got
free earlier this year, so unless they've made a recent change - and my last
visit to the site a few weeks ago didn't hint at it - then th
I've been running a number of low volume sites on a 1.5M dsl with 128k
uplink for five+ years.
dyndns is excellent but now charge for new accounts and there are free
services available.
You didn't say if you were Linux or Windows. I use Linux, on an older
box with ddclient to update dns. The
On 13:40 Fri 19 Oct , Tyler() wrote:
>
>
> I'm a noob servers & stuff, I was wondering what I
> would need to buy to host my own websites. Like, for a
> beginner. I know how to code like html and php but I
> need my own server so I dont have to use a web hosting
> company.. Can you help?
> Th
You'll need:
- broadband Internet service, with AT LEAST 384K uplink
- a DynDNS account or similar, if said service doesn't include a static IP
- your own registered domain name or a subdomain from DynDNS, etc.
- a service or daemon to update the DNS records for said domain/subdomain,
if not a
I am getting an internal server error (500) if I place the following in my
ROOT .htaccess:
Header set Expires "Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:35:41 GMT"
Header set Cache-Control "max-age: 2764800; public"
Header set Expires "Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:35:41 GMT"
Header set Cache-Control "max-age: 86400; public"
I'm a noob servers & stuff, I was wondering what I
would need to buy to host my own websites. Like, for a
beginner. I know how to code like html and php but I
need my own server so I dont have to use a web hosting
company.. Can you help?
Thanks,
Tyler
--
View this message in context:
http://ww
It's an issue with openssl. I experienced the same problem when I upgraded
on two test servers. Downgrading solved this issue as well.
It seems to have been reported to openssl bug tracking already.
On 10/19/07, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > For the last 24 hours I've been getting thes
> Proxying bad applications is a dirty business. They do not
> get any cleaner when they are told to behave nicely behind
> a proxy.
I'm afraid you're right...
> mod_rewrite has that too. When proxying with mod_rewrite it is
> a good practice to set that.
>
> RewriteRule /(.*) http://backend/$1
> > For the last 24 hours I've been getting these errors in ssl_error_log:
> >
> > [error] unusably short session_id provided (0 bytes)
> >
> > and I've received no customer orders. This could correspond to my
> > upgrading to openssl-0.9.8f. I guess I'll downgrade to 0.9.8e-r3 for
> > now. Does
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Peter Milanese wrote:
I've been trying to get auth going between 2.2.6 and Lotus Domino,
and I think I've honed in on the problem. I don't think it is related
directly to Domino. I backed out to 2.0.61, and had the same issue.
Outch! There have been reports a
Thanks Bill... Your input is quite helpful.
I put mm's auth_ldap in place for the moment since I have bigger proverbial
fish to fry at the moment!
I'll try and get some time to lose wldap32, or see if any recent m$ updates
have damaged the relationship.
- Original Message
From: "Wil
Stusynski, Dan wrote:
I tested the SSL communication and everything appears to work just fine.
Of course, I'm not sure what that means. :-)
Unfortunately, I do. Thanks for bringing this to my attention, Dan - I'll
be extra cautious in the 2.2.7 package that mod_ssl/abs .dep files don't
pick
Peter Milanese wrote:
I've been trying to get auth going between 2.2.6 and Lotus Domino,
and I think I've honed in on the problem. I don't think it is related
directly to Domino. I backed out to 2.0.61, and had the same issue.
Outch! There have been reports about win32 ldap connections.
On 10/19/07, Mark Drummond wrote:
>
> I have Apache sitting in front of some WebSphere app servers. So far, we
> have always used virtual hosts in Apache to give each application it's own
> FQDN. So we have app1.foo.com , app2.foo.com etc. This is leading to a
> (small) proliferation of FQDNs, and
First thank you for your reply Christian,
We are not apache experts but we understand proxy.
We have read the mod_rewrite and do understand what it can do for us but
one thing it does not indicate with a lot of apache information is what
happens at the transport level. Although at a proxy level t
GoDaddy offers it as an option.
I assume the cert vendor will understand what that means? I was hoping
to do the same with my ldap directory servers, one cert for
ldap.foo.com, and ldap.foo.com load balanced across the physical
boxes.
On 19/10/2007, Ajai Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On
I assume the cert vendor will understand what that means? I was hoping
to do the same with my ldap directory servers, one cert for
ldap.foo.com, and ldap.foo.com load balanced across the physical
boxes.
On 19/10/2007, Ajai Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Peter Milanese wr
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Peter Milanese wrote:
> As far as I know, no. Although, I've never really considered it.
You can if its a wildcard certificate.
--
Aj.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Serve
I guess I figured that if both servers have a virtual server answering to "
bar.foo.com" then I only needed the one cert for "bar.foo.com" installed to
both hosts.
On 19/10/2007, Peter Milanese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As far as I know, no. Although, I've never really considered it.
>
>
As far as I know, no. Although, I've never really considered it.
- Original Message
From: Mark Drummond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:25:54 AM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
application.company.com vs. www.
We're a relatively small shop. We have some Cisco content switches, and the
intent *is* to load balance across two physical boxes, but the SSL will be
handled by the web servers themselves.
Can I use the same cert on both machines?
On 19/10/2007, Peter Milanese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If y
If you have the cash, front end it with some SSL Terminating load balancers.
- Original Message
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:16:47 AM
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
application.compan
I like the cleanness of app.foo.com but you can do www.foo.com/app and
just make the URL look like app.foo.com using rewrites. I haven't
actually tried to see if that'll work with SSL though. I'd probably just
use an IP per each if you have enough IPs to do it. Keeping everything
clean will sav
Unless you are using the load balancer ( hardware or software ) or a
load balancing scheme it shouldn't matter.
From: Mark Drummond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:09 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] application.company.com vs.
www
Hi all,
I have Apache sitting in front of some WebSphere app servers. So far, we
have always used virtual hosts in Apache to give each application it's own
FQDN. So we have app1.foo.com, app2.foo.com etc. This is leading to a
(small) proliferation of FQDNs, and now I am wondering if it is better t
Hello,
I found the problem, Apache tried to bind port 443 twice to the same IP.
It is solved. Thank you!
Reagrds, J. Schröder
Johan Schröder schrieb:
Hello,
yes, there isn't any hung process.
Peter Milanese schrieb:
Did you check for any hung processes?
ps -ef | grep http
- Origin
I will be out of the office starting 10/18/2007 and will not return until
10/22/2007.
Thank you for your email. I will be out of the office until Monday,
October 22. I will respond to your email when I return. Thanks!
-
The
Bill,
I recompiled OpenSSL exactly as suggested by you and the provided link.
Running the OpenSSL test yields a handshake with 0 errors. The problem
with compiling Apache persists though.
As a result, I changed my testing to remove what was causing the break
(the two dependancy lines in /modules
Hi there,
I am trying to figure out a simple way to write a
flag into the access log. This flag should state
wether a request has been treated locally or wether
it has been proxied/forwarded to a backend server.
So far I arrived with
LogFormat "... %{proxyflag}e ..." extended
SetEnv proxyflag
hya,
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 03:32:37PM +0200, Alan AZZERA wrote:
> I ran into such awful hacks with mod_proxy_html.
Proxying bad applications is a dirty business. They do not
get any cleaner when they are told to behave nicely behind
a proxy.
> IMHO... It could be efficient, but it was impossi
at the end of the rules ( or in an included rule file with the highest
number) put this line to reverse the effect of that rule in question
SecRuleRemoveById xxx
where xxx is the rule ID you can see from the debug output.
- Original Message -
From: "Grant Peel" <[EMAIL
Hi there,
Why are you using an old version of ModSecurity? As you
start anew I suggest you start out with ModSecurity > 2.1.
Then stick with the core-rules for a start and read
the excellent security blog on the website to deal with
false positives. There are many very good posts on the
subject.
Hi all,
I installed mod_security yesterday on one server and am in the process of
debugging.
Along with mod_security itself, I have installed a number of rules, most of
which are not causing any issues. The two below are causing some problems
though:
Number one seems to do its job too well as
Hello,
yes, there isn't any hung process.
Peter Milanese schrieb:
Did you check for any hung processes?
ps -ef | grep http
- Original Message
From: Johan Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 4:42:33 AM
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pro
On 10/19/07, Peter Milanese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi folks-
>
>I've been trying to get auth going between 2.2.6 and Lotus Domino, and I
> think I've honed in on the problem. I don't think it is related directly to
> Domino. I backed out to 2.0.61, and had the same issue.
>
> Looks like
Hi !
Thanks for answering...
> You are facing a very typical problem.
Undoubtly ;) !
> I am not proficient with mod_proxy_html, so I am not sure I can help you.
> However, the est way is always to go and fix the application.
It's such a pain ! There are plenty of well-designed apps, but far
mo
Did you check for any hung processes?
ps -ef | grep http
- Original Message
From: Johan Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 4:42:33 AM
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with Apache2 after upgrade (could not bind
to address)
Hello,
Hey Alan,
You are facing a very typical problem. I am not proficient
with mod_proxy_html, so I am not sure I can help you.
However, the best way is always to go and fix the
application. If you can not do that for whatever
reason, then mod_proxy_html is a good approach. A
more general approach is
Hi folks-
I've been trying to get auth going between 2.2.6 and Lotus Domino, and I
think I've honed in on the problem. I don't think it is related directly to
Domino. I backed out to 2.0.61, and had the same issue.
Looks like mod_auth_ldap is using the wldap dll. Could there be a linking
pr
Hi world !
Here is my problem, I hope someone could help me.
I need to host some web apps, coded in PHP by non-professional developpers,
and sometimes poorly written and designed. I use an Apache server configured
as a Reverse Proxy, my real HTTP server is behind this R.P. I have two DNS
zones, a
Ok, here's something I don't understand. I've connected my apache and tomcat
using mod_jk
in my httpd.conf I wrote
SetEnv REMOTE_USER xxx
PassEnv REMOTE_USER
and then in tomcat I just wrote a file
<% out.print (request.getAttribute("REMOTE_USER")); %> and well enough, I got
xxx printed on the
Hello,
I updated Ubuntu 7.04 to 7.10 and now Apache2 is not working anymore:
* Starting web server apache2
apache2: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified
domain name, using xyz.de for ServerName
(98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address [::]:443
(98)A
44 matches
Mail list logo
