I saved the file with the full output do you want to see that.. i only took a
section from it.
Christian Folini-4 wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:27:59AM -0800, Andrew Rosolino wrote:
>>
>> Ok I did it but how am I suppose to read this?
>
> That's not the interesting part. There should
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:41:57PM +0100, Fabrizio Reale wrote:
> I have a web application (Plone) which has its own authentication, but in an
> intranet I set up the NTLM authentication using the mod_ntlm module.
> It works very well when I am using a windows PC, but when I use my Linux
> desktop
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:27:59AM -0800, Andrew Rosolino wrote:
>
> Ok I did it but how am I suppose to read this?
That's not the interesting part. There should be more data.
Below is an example of a simple GET request
in a local setup. You can clearly see the request.
You can also take this in
On Nov 8, 2007 6:38 PM, Grant Peel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a security company hounding me to turn of HTDigest.
>
> Any idea how?
If they think it is so important, why not ask them? Or are they just
following some set of inflexible rules that even they don't really
understan
Hi all,
I have a security company hounding me to turn of HTDigest.
Any idea how?
Words of wisdom ... please.
-Grant
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/user
On Nov 8, 2007 2:24 PM, Samuel Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I did think that not saving as UTF8 was the problem:
> But is there some on the fly workaround? Since some of my users seem to
> be to dumb to do it by there selfs.
I don't know what browsers do with the BOM in html files. It is
Ok, I did think that not saving as UTF8 was the problem:
But is there some on the fly workaround? Since some of my users seem to
be to dumb to do it by there selfs.
Regards,
Samy
Joshua Slive schrieb:
On Nov 8, 2007 2:01 PM, Samuel Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey guys,
I do experien
On Nov 8, 2007 10:08 AM, Angelo Miranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your answer.
> I didnt notice the 400 code.
> For instance in this day (2007/11/7) the error_log is clean. No errors.
> Do you think the problem might be on Tomcat ? Some hint ?
Yes, if you don't see anythin
On Nov 8, 2007 2:01 PM, Samuel Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I do experience a weird issue. This has been going on for some time though.
> Apache adds 3 weird looking charakters to the top of some HTML pages:
>
> 
>
That's the UTF BOM, added by your editor not apache. See:
h
Hey,
Every time I try to use the new version of OpenAds on my localhost version my
HTTP server crashes.
Error log details:
[crit] (OS 10038)An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket.
: Parent: WSADuplicateSocket failed for socket 6821136. Check the FAQ.
[crit] (OS 109)The p
Hey guys,
I do experience a weird issue. This has been going on for some time though.
Apache adds 3 weird looking charakters to the top of some HTML pages:

The real file on the command prompt starts like this:
I guess this is an encoding issue. But my config file does contain a
"AddD
Ok I did it but how am I suppose to read this?
J5...3.P..w8P...{.
13:26:22.990526 IP alpha2.shiftcode.com.http > nat10.ekspres.net.pl.3891: .
ack 1 win 6432
E..([EMAIL PROTECTED]@.G.J5..S..
.P.3...{..w.P.. \...
13:26:22.994371 IP nat10.ekspres.net.pl.3891 > alpha2.shi
--- Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 23:31:10 -0800 (PST)
> Martin Fick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The end
> > result should be that the page returned by th
> > webserver (myapache.com) should actually be
> > http://website.com/webpage.html but the request
> has
--- Axel-Stephane SMORGRAV
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well there are 8 lines about implementation issues
> and 2 lines of warning. I would not call that a
> lecture...
Sorry, I jumped too quickly. I knew that the moment
I hit the send button. :(
I would still like a proposed solution, most
Krist,
Thanks for your quick answer. I re-unpacked the Apache HTTP 2.0.61
software in my account without using 'sudo'. Then I tried 'configure'
and 'make' commands without using sudo. This time it seemed that I
successfully passed these two stages as I only found a (minor) warning
during 'make' st
The system I use keeps administrators at arms length by requiring they
interact with servers through a service that lets them do the desired
admin tasks such as working with users and groups, configuring services,
starting/stopping services, etc. All functions can be individually
allowed or den
I understand that everything is black or white to you, and there are no shades
of grey. Good for you.
-ascs
-Message d'origine-
De : Michael McGlothlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 8 novembre 2007 17:17
À : users@httpd.apache.org
Objet : Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache as no
I plan to give everyone root access. Security is a silly concept anyway
because obviously everyone can be trusted.
Somebody trusted you enough to give YOU the root password.
Why should you not in turn entrust others with the privileges that will allow
them to do their job?
--
Well there are 8 lines about implementation issues and 2 lines of warning. I
would not call that a lecture...
-ascs
-Message d'origine-
De : Martin Fick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 8 novembre 2007 17:08
À : users@httpd.apache.org
Objet : RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using a proxy
Sorry, I missed that. That did fix the compile issue but unfortunately
not the issue with the mysql support actually being compile in. Any
other ideas?
*Daniel Campbell
Director Of Networking
& Purchasing Agent
On2 Technologies
21 Corporate Drive
Suite 103
Clifton Park, NY 12065
518-348-0099 e
Sorry but I was really asking for implementation help,
not a lecture on security...
-Martin
--- Axel-Stephane SMORGRAV
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you're cruising for a bruising.
>
> The only way I can imagine it would possible to
> achieve this would be by creating a reverse proxy.
>
> Fir
Somebody trusted you enough to give YOU the root password.
Why should you not in turn entrust others with the privileges that will allow
them to do their job?
-ascs
-Message d'origine-
De : Krist van Besien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 8 novembre 2007 16:40
À : users@http
On Nov 8, 2007 3:50 PM, Axel-Stephane SMORGRAV
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Krist van Besien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : jeudi 8 novembre 2007 15:14
> À : users@httpd.apache.org
> Objet : Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache as non-root
>
> > You could use a wra
On Nov 8, 2007 4:13 PM, Hu, Leigi (CDC/CCHIS/NCPHI) (CTR) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Krist,
>
> (1) I use gcc compiler on the UNIX box.
> (2) I tried 'configure' without 'sudo' privileges and got 'Permission
> denied' error:
> ./configure: line 1571: config.log: Permission denied
> ./configure:
Krist,
(1) I use gcc compiler on the UNIX box.
(2) I tried 'configure' without 'sudo' privileges and got 'Permission
denied' error:
./configure: line 1571: config.log: Permission denied
./configure: line 1581: config.log: Permission denied
These lines from file 'configure' are listed below for yo
Ok next time it happens ill try tcpdump -A -s 0 port 80 and let you know..
thank u.
Christian Folini-4 wrote:
>
> Hey Andrew,
>
> You have to try and isolate the problem.
> It's a start to remove modules and make the issue
> go away in a lab setup and thus identify the component
> that is causi
Hi,
Thank you for your answer.
I didnt notice the 400 code.
For instance in this day (2007/11/7) the error_log is clean. No errors.
Do you think the problem might be on Tomcat ? Some hint ?
Thanks
Angelo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jo
On Nov 8, 2007 9:50 AM, Angelo Miranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am getting multiple lines in access_log for the same request. Most of the
> time several in the same second or in the near seconds. Sometimes it can
> take 1 hour or so.
Since these are pdf files, it is most likely acrobat doi
-Message d'origine-
De : Krist van Besien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 8 novembre 2007 15:14
À : users@httpd.apache.org
Objet : Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache as non-root
> You could use a wrapper script (as I do) that the user can't change.
You could, but AFAICS the only point
Hi everyone,
I am getting multiple lines in access_log for the same request. Most of the
time several in the same second or in the near seconds. Sometimes it can
take 1 hour or so.
This is happening for several IP's, in several days, in several pages.
Something must be happening with my acces
Excellent, I'll give that a shot!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Strand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:38 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache1.3 forward to Jboss
A quick fix would be to add this:
ServerAlias www.rememberit
On Nov 8, 2007 9:12 AM, Axel-Stephane SMORGRAV
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Message d'origine-
> >De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Joshua Slive
> >Envoyé : jeudi 8 novembre 2007 14:56
> >À : users@httpd.apache.org
> >Objet : Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache as no
On Nov 8, 2007 3:24 PM, Hu, Leigi (CDC/CCHIS/NCPHI) (CTR) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Thanks for your help in advance.
Firstly, What compiler are you using?
Secondly, you don't need root privileges for the configure and make
commands. What happens when you run them as a normal user?
Krist
--
A quick fix would be to add this:
ServerAlias www.rememberit.us
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 15:31:06 +0100, Schaible, Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have a webapp running at 8080 and want port 80 connections to
be sent to 8080. I have the following configuration
NameV
Hello everyone,
I have a webapp running at 8080 and want port 80 connections to
be sent to 8080. I have the following configuration
NameVirtualHost my.ip:80
ServerName rememberit.us
ProxyPass /repos !
ProxyPass / http://www.rememberit.us:8080/
This is working fine if you type
Hi there,
I try to install Apache HTTP 2.0.61 server on a Solaris 10 UNIX machine.
I can't check the signature of the downloaded Apache HTTP 2.0.61 as my
UNIX machine doesn't recognize the 'gpg' command. When I was trying to
configure Apache HTTP 2.0.61, I received the following WARNING message
On Nov 8, 2007 2:55 PM, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2007 7:11 AM, Axel-Stephane SMORGRAV
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think you would need to elaborate on that statement. Frankly I can see a
> > few differences, but I am not sure whether those are what you were think
-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Joshua Slive
>Envoyé : jeudi 8 novembre 2007 14:56
>À : users@httpd.apache.org
>Objet : Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache as non-root
>
>On Nov 8, 2007 7:11 AM, Axel-Stephane SMORGRAV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 8, 2007 7:11 AM, Axel-Stephane SMORGRAV
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you would need to elaborate on that statement. Frankly I can see a
> few differences, but I am not sure whether those are what you were thinking
> about. Apache also does a chuid/chgid effectively changing the UI
I think you would need to elaborate on that statement. Frankly I can see a few
differences, but I am not sure whether those are what you were thinking about.
Apache also does a chuid/chgid effectively changing the UID/GID of the process
to something which is hopefully not privileged.
Whether Ap
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:36:51AM +0100, Bj wrote:
> httperf (from HP) is also basic but a bit more evolued.
>
> You can use Jmeter to test your Webservice. If you want to obtain 1
> req/s with Jmeter you will have to use several Jmeter instances on several
> servers.
siege and proxysniffer
ab is a "basic" tool. Sometimes it's not able to complete the bench when the
number (or/and the concurrency) of requests is too high.
what is excatly your "timeout" message ?
Are you sure that your underlaying application server is not overloaded ?
httperf (from HP) is also basic but a bit more
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:00:10AM +0100, Krist van Besien wrote:
> > Sounds like a task for "sudo".
>
> Another option is making the httpd executable suid root.
Ouch.
Starting a webserver on port 80 as a normal user is not
a good thing. Sudo helps to limit the security breach somewhat
if you re
On Nov 6, 2007 4:59 PM, Christian Folini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 02:29:03PM +, Melanie Pfefer wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > I modified user in httpd.conf but as long as the port
> > number is 80, only root can start apache. subsequent
> > process will be run as non-root.
>
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 23:31:10 -0800 (PST)
Martin Fick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The end
> result should be that the page returned by th
> webserver (myapache.com) should actually be
> http://website.com/webpage.html but the request has to
> go through privoxy!
ProxyRemote?
--
Nick Kew
45 matches
Mail list logo
