Hello,
I created a specific configuration for a reverse proxy, which does some
URL rewriting and accesses a remote server. This rproxy is a IPv6 to
IPv4 gateway to allow IPv4 users accessing IPv6 only servers. IPv6
interface has multiple IPv6 addresses:
1.) 2a01:dead:beef::2/128
2.) 2a01:dea
Hey Tony & all,
Yep, that did it. I was not aware of that flag,
pretty new to rewrite rules.
Much thanks!
Skip
Tony Stevenson wrote:
Skip Evans wrote:
Hey all,
I have the following rewrite rule in an .htaccess file.
RewriteRule .modules.php?(.*)$
http://prepcube.venomouspenguin.com/modul
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Tony Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Skip Evans wrote:
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I have the following rewrite rule in an .htaccess file.
>>
>> RewriteRule .modules.php?(.*)$
>> http://prepcube.venomouspenguin.com/modules.php?$1
The query string (arguments) aren't
Skip Evans wrote:
Hey all,
I have the following rewrite rule in an .htaccess file.
RewriteRule .modules.php?(.*)$
http://prepcube.venomouspenguin.com/modules.php?$1
And it does successfully call the modules.php file in the document root,
but the arguments do not get passed.
In other words
Hey all,
I have the following rewrite rule in an .htaccess
file.
RewriteRule .modules.php?(.*)$
http://prepcube.venomouspenguin.com/modules.php?$1
And it does successfully call the modules.php file
in the document root, but the arguments do not get
passed.
In other words, if
modules.ph
Hey everyone. We have been running Apache 2.2 as a reverse proxy cache
server for some time, and in general it performs great. We have one
nagging problem however.
Currently we have a cluster of 70+ back-end web servers that are
BalancerMember's. If we apachectl stop on a backend web, we are fine
I am wondering if this has something to do with the .do file extension.
However, it works fine without the virtual host -- what different
criteria would the virtual host be looking at?
Here is my virtual host - it's really basic. I have substituted "x"'s
for our actual ip address what do you
Well, that makes it baby stuff!
Thanks for the suggestion. I have my head stuck in mod_macro, which would be a
bear for this.
- Original Message
From: Krist van Besien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2008 9:33:51 AM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 14:08, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi folks-
>
> I am implementing a new infrastructure. It consists of pre-dev, dev,
> staging, and production boxes behind F5's. I also implemented a Polyserve
> matrix over the SAN.
>
> That being said, what's everyone's take on shared
Hi folks-
I am implementing a new infrastructure. It consists of pre-dev, dev,
staging, and production boxes behind F5's. I also implemented a Polyserve
matrix over the SAN.
That being said, what's everyone's take on shared binaries with the apache
configs macro'd to the hostnames (including
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 23:48, Biernesser, Beth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I configure a virtual host for my website, I get a listing of files
> instead of the home page. This index file has a .do extension. However,
> when I remove this virtual host from the httpd.conf file, the website
>
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 22:20, stinger520 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already have an svn repository and I am working on getting it set up so
> that it can be accessed from anywhere through https view ssl.
You want that someone can access it using a web browser? Using the
simple svn web view in
12 matches
Mail list logo
