Re: [us...@httpd] Idea for SSL with name-based Vhosts using two servers, mod_rewrite, and mod_proxy

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Brian Mearns wrote: > Right, which I guess is a big problem for most use cases. For me, my > certificate is self-signed anyway, and I already use it for multiple > hostnames (myserver.net, www.myserver.net, web.myserver.net, which are > all aliased to the same vhos

Re: [us...@httpd] Problem with URI conversion on Apache-1.3.41

The UTF-8 equivalent for あいうえお (URI resource part) is %E3%81%82%E3%81%84%E3%81%86%E3%81%88%E3%81%8A. I use http://hpcgi1.nifty.com/glass/url/url_encode.cgi to verify the same. And to add-on to this, found http://osdir.com/ml/apache.devel/2002-03/msg00117.html URL which in brief mentions the follow

Re: [us...@httpd] Problem with URI conversion on Apache-1.3.41

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:18 AM, sathya sai wrote: > Hi Apache folks, > > When I enter http://x.x.x.x/docs/あいうえお.pdf (x.x.x.x a japanese system) from > my firefox browser, I could see that my browser translates the URI resource > portion to UTF-8 encoded formated > (%E3%81%82%E3%81%84%E3%81%86%E3%

[us...@httpd] Problem with URI conversion on Apache-1.3.41

Hi Apache folks, When I enter http://x.x.x.x/docs/あいうえお.pdf (x.x.x.x a japanese system) from my firefox browser, I could see that my browser translates the URI resource portion to UTF-8 encoded formated (%E3%81%82%E3%81%84%E3%81%86%E3%81%88%E3%81%8A.pdf) which is as expect

Re: [us...@httpd] Virtual Hosts Problem - Many hours - No Luck

Joseph Morgan wrote: Well, actually I have... but my stupid email client is trying to interpret the VirtualHost tags as HTML in the email... and therefore the VirtualHost stanzas aren't visible in the email text So, imagine that the VirtualHost blocks are correctly there. Ok, if that is the

[us...@httpd] Proxy fails to translate

I have an Apache server ver. 2.2.6 on a Win 2k3 platform. It's been running for almost a year and the only function of it is to provide reverse proxy for an internal web application. The problem that we are experiencing is with a customer that is behind a proxy server them self. In this case th

[us...@httpd] Resubmit: where should I send this Q?

I sent the following question to this list a couple of days ago, but received no response. So now I ask simply TO WHICH APACHE MAILING LIST SHOULD I SEND THIS QUESTION, for the best chance of getting help? Our server is running Apache 2.2.11 with the Event MPM under FreeBSD 6.3, on a site that

Re: [us...@httpd] help I do not understand

swilting a écrit : I just change my dns I add a CNAME between fakessh.eu and www.fakessh.eu I wait until tomorrow spread I have ServerAlias Directive fakessh.eu Le mardi 06 janvier 2009 à 13:08 -0500, Eric Covener a écrit : On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:00 AM, john.swilt...@wanadoo.fr wrote: Eri

Re: [us...@httpd] Idea for SSL with name-based Vhosts using two servers, mod_rewrite, and mod_proxy

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Davide Bianchi wrote: > Brian Mearns wrote: >> for secure http support. The frontend server can then use rewrite >> conditions to check the http Host header, and rewrite rules with the > > And how can he check the host header if the request is encrypted? He has > t

Re: [us...@httpd] Idea for SSL with name-based Vhosts using two servers, mod_rewrite, and mod_proxy

Brian Mearns wrote: > for secure http support. The frontend server can then use rewrite > conditions to check the http Host header, and rewrite rules with the And how can he check the host header if the request is encrypted? He has to decrypt it. And to do so, he needs a certificate. Davide --

Re: [us...@httpd] Idea for SSL with name-based Vhosts using two servers, mod_rewrite, and mod_proxy

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Brian Mearns wrote: > The only obvious drawbacks I can think of is possible lag introduced > by having to proxy, and that all the sites would have to use the same > certificate (as defined in the port 443 vhost on the "frontend" > server). And that is the problem.

[us...@httpd] Idea for SSL with name-based Vhosts using two servers, mod_rewrite, and mod_proxy

I know everyone always asks about having name-based-virtual hosts with a secure connection, and I understand why it's not currently possible. So I was thinking of ways around this, and I came up with a little something. I haven't tested it yet, but I'm curious what people think. The idea is to hav

[us...@httpd] Disable mod_proxy_html for subfolders

I'm setting up a reverse proxy system with Apache 2.2.8 on Ubuntu JeOS 8.04.1, and using mod_proxy_html. We have multiple backend servers, Apache identical to our proxy setup, and IIS. Our root site requires the use of mod_proxy_html which makes it active for every sub-directory on the sys

Re: [us...@httpd] Virtual Hosts Problem - Many hours - No Luck

Well, actually I have... but my stupid email client is trying to interpret the VirtualHost tags as HTML in the email... and therefore the VirtualHost stanzas aren't visible in the email text So, imagine that the VirtualHost blocks are correctly Norman Peelman wrote: > Rob wrote: >> It Need

Re: [us...@httpd] Virtual Hosts Problem - Many hours - No Luck

Well, actually I have... but my stupid email client is trying to interpret the VirtualHost tags as HTML in the email... and therefore the VirtualHost stanzas aren't visible in the email text So, imagine that the VirtualHost blocks are correctly there. Krist van Besien wrote: > On Wed, Jan

Re: [us...@httpd] Virtual Hosts Problem - Many hours - No Luck

Joseph Morgan wrote: Jim here is my changed httpd.conf file: NameVirtualHost * # = ServerAdmin ad...@prosportsresumes.com DocumentRoot G:/webroot/htdocs/ProSportsResumes ServerName www.ProSportsResumes.com #

Re: [us...@httpd] Virtual Hosts Problem - Many hours - No Luck

Rob wrote: It Needs to look something like this: http://127.0.0.1:80>> ServerAdmin ad...@prosportsresumes.com DocumentRoot G:/webroot/htdocs/ProSportsResumes ServerName www.ProSportsResumes.com 127.0.0.1 should be ur serv

[us...@httpd] Problem with URI conversion on Apache-1.3.41

Hi Apache folks, When I enter http://x.x.x.x/docs/あいうえお.pdf (x.x.x.x a japanese system) from my firefox browser, I could see that my browser translates the URI resource portion to UTF-8 encoded formated (%E3%81%82%E3%81%84%E3%81%86%E3%81%88%E3%81%8A.pdf) which is as expecte

Re: [us...@httpd] help I do not understand

john.swilt...@wanadoo.fr a écrit : swilting a écrit : I just change my dns I add a CNAME between fakessh.eu and www.fakessh.eu I wait until tomorrow spread I have ServerAlias Directive fakessh.eu Le mardi 06 janvier 2009 à 13:08 -0500, Eric Covener a écrit : On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:00 AM

[us...@httpd] mod_proxy configuration problem using 2.2.11

Hi All, I am having a problem with mod_proxy and httpd 2.2.11 my mod_proxy_balancer configuration looks like this: BalancerMember http://192.168.1.101:8000 route=1 connectiontimeout=3 status=D BalancerMember http://192.168.1.102:8000 route=2 connectiontimeout=3 status=D BalancerMember

Re: [us...@httpd] help I do not understand

swilting a écrit : I just change my dns I add a CNAME between fakessh.eu and www.fakessh.eu I wait until tomorrow spread I have ServerAlias Directive fakessh.eu Le mardi 06 janvier 2009 à 13:08 -0500, Eric Covener a écrit : On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:00 AM, john.swilt...@wanadoo.fr wrote: