Bruno - e-comBR wrote:
> You can difficult it to be downloaded in massive way by automated
> scripts to prevent somebody doing massive download if you want.
>
> But, preventing the downloading and allowing it at the same time is
> impossible. You have two options: allow or deny.
>
> Allowing the do
Just an idea ... have you tried putting the hexadecimal representation of
the "+" symbol so apache translates it into "+" when encoding?
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Clodoaldo Pinto Neto <
clodoaldo.pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/4/7 Clodoaldo Pinto Neto :
> > 2009/4/3 André Warnier :
> >> Cl
awarnier wrote:
>
> deh wrote:
>>
>> awarnier wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Maybe the very first thing you need to do, if you are going to use your
>>> email program to post to lists such as this one, is to turn off all
>>> these nice features like "view as html" and "send as html". View and
>>> c
sh: apachectl/apache2ctl/httpd/: No such file or directory
I am on my way out.
On 8-Apr-09, at 8:24 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
Can you include a full apachectl/apache2ctl/httpd/ -S?
Rich in Toronto
...now go get on your bike
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Viaduct Productions
wrote:
> So 1 NameVirtualHost *:80 per ?
>
> I've only had that once on my previous servers.
>
> I just entered one per, just before, and that error came up 11 times.
>
No, 1:n.
Can you include a full apachectl/apache2ctl/httpd/ -S?
--
Eric C
So 1 NameVirtualHost *:80 per ?
I've only had that once on my previous servers.
I just entered one per, just before, and that error came up 11 times.
On 8-Apr-09, at 8:17 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
You should have only 1 NameVirtualHost for "n" matching VirtualHost
containers. Extras can trigg
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Viaduct Productions
wrote:
> Hi folks. I seem to be having some issues with vhosts. The error:
>
> [Wed Apr 08 19:53:42 2009] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no VirtualHosts
> Syntax OK
You should have only 1 NameVirtualHost for "n" matching VirtualHost
containe
Hi folks. I seem to be having some issues with vhosts. The error:
[Wed Apr 08 19:53:42 2009] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no
VirtualHosts
Syntax OK
My rich.conf is indeed included, and is used on my development box.
I've created a handful of local "domains" so that I can split up site
Eric Covener wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
Seems like a simple proxy reverse proxy might be sufficient
One too many proxies!
What do you do with the responses from both servers though ?
-
The
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> Seems like a simple proxy reverse proxy might be sufficient
One too many proxies!
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 6:09 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> John Oliver wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 04:16:32PM -0400, Eric Covener wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:37 PM, John Oliver
>>> wrote:
Is it possible for an instance of httpd to basically copy all traffic it
rece
John Oliver wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 04:16:32PM -0400, Eric Covener wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:37 PM, John Oliver wrote:
Is it possible for an instance of httpd to basically copy all traffic it
receives to another instance of httpd on another host?
No -- You want something much low
deh wrote:
awarnier wrote:
Hi.
Maybe the very first thing you need to do, if you are going to use your
email program to post to lists such as this one, is to turn off all
these nice features like "view as html" and "send as html". View and
compose and send as plain text, or you are going t
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 04:16:32PM -0400, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:37 PM, John Oliver wrote:
> > Is it possible for an instance of httpd to basically copy all traffic it
> > receives to another instance of httpd on another host?
>
> No -- You want something much lower-level,
After upgrading from Apache 2.2.6 to Apache 2.2.9, when gracefully shutting
down one of our Embedded Tomcats on our application
server, we notice a temporary outage (503) from our proxy balancer before the
Hot Standby (status=+H) takes over.
Layout:
- Application proxy server (Apache 2.2.9)
-
awarnier wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Maybe the very first thing you need to do, if you are going to use your
> email program to post to lists such as this one, is to turn off all
> these nice features like "view as html" and "send as html". View and
> compose and send as plain text, or you are going
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:37 PM, John Oliver wrote:
> Is it possible for an instance of httpd to basically copy all traffic it
> receives to another instance of httpd on another host?
No -- You want something much lower-level, like a TCP tunnel or a load
balancer. Apache will always decrypt/re-enc
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 07:56:39PM +0200, André Warnier wrote:
> Ok, part of my answer below is because I missed the subject of your
> post. It still does not seem to make much sense hhowever, so explain a
> bit more.
>
> André Warnier wrote:
> >John Oliver wrote:
> >>Is it possible for an insta
Hi.
Maybe the very first thing you need to do, if you are going to use your
email program to post to lists such as this one, is to turn off all
these nice features like "view as html" and "send as html". View and
compose and send as plain text, or you are going to confuse yourself and
others
Ok, part of my answer below is because I missed the subject of your
post. It still does not seem to make much sense hhowever, so explain a
bit more.
André Warnier wrote:
John Oliver wrote:
Is it possible for an instance of httpd to basically copy all traffic it
receives to another instance of
Krist van Besien wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 5:32 AM, deh wrote:
>>
>> I wanted to setup my web pages that are on verizon.net on my local
>> network
>> with a machine running Suse 11.1/apache2. I downloaded the web pages
>> with
>> 'wget -a -k' into a directory and set the directory/root
John Oliver wrote:
Is it possible for an instance of httpd to basically copy all traffic it
receives to another instance of httpd on another host?
As put, the question just deserves a "yes".
I'll be nice though :
That's certainly possible, most of the time. But why would you want to
do that,
Is it possible for an instance of httpd to basically copy all traffic it
receives to another instance of httpd on another host?
--
***
* John Oliver http://www.john-oliver.net/ *
*
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:31:34 -0400
Brian Mearns wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Josh Trutwin
> wrote:
> > I'm dealing with something odd and I can't figure out what to
> > make of it - I have the following rewrite rule:
> >
> > RewriteRule
> > ^([0-9]+)/([a-z0-9]+)/get_flash\.php$ /get_
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Josh Trutwin wrote:
> I'm dealing with something odd and I can't figure out what to make of
> it - I have the following rewrite rule:
>
> RewriteRule
> ^([0-9]+)/([a-z0-9]+)/get_flash\.php$ /get_file.php?id=$1&flash=1&key=$2
> [L]
>
> then a URL liks this /123/2313
I'm dealing with something odd and I can't figure out what to make of
it - I have the following rewrite rule:
RewriteRule
^([0-9]+)/([a-z0-9]+)/get_flash\.php$ /get_file.php?id=$1&flash=1&key=$2
[L]
then a URL liks this /123/2313412sdfsdf/get_flash.php works fine.
BUT if I change my rule to this
Thanks Eric and Prasanna.
To answer - all .htm pages are served by tomcat, so apache acts only as a proxy.
Some .htm pages work, others don't.
When I try the HTTP connector from Tomcat, these pages that don't work
return an incomplete status line: "HTTP/1.x 200" , instead of
"HTTP/1.x 200 OK" (t
Ok,
So I've switched to the collab.net version of the subversion package. This
includes a 2.2.8 version of apache. They also only include 3 modules I their
config (python_module, dav_svn_module, authz_svn_module). This seems to be
enough to get SSL and LDAP lookups working for me.
After aro
I have a little problem that you guys may help me wtih...
I have a directory on my apache that i want to protect.
>From outside our internal network only specific hosts togheter with a
specific user should be allowed access to the directory. In apache terms:
Allow from (external_host)
Require val
Stephen Goldschmidt wrote:
[snip]
my question is the certificate is only assigned to one domain name.
www.domain.com
so in my browser if i go to www.domain.com or domain.com the ssl
certificate works with no problems.
[snip]
Just a side comment, I would guess your cert is "assigned" to
'doma
>> Yes it is possible to do with a VirtualDocumentRoot but the thing to
>> remember is the value of DocumentRoot does not equal VirtualDocumentRoot.
>> If DocumentRoot is important in your applications you can use
>> multiple VirtualHosts with SSL by using different port numbers.
Doesn't that requ
You mentioned some html pages only have this wierd problem. Are all those
problematic htmls are in tomcat or only some of them in tomcat and rest
in Apachel?
Regards
Prasanna Ram
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Marius Hanganu wrote:
> Thanks for responding.
>
> I am indeed using mod_proxy, but
Thanks for getting back to me.
I tried adding the code as you described below but the server seemed to go into
a loop and did not open the page.
So what I did instead was I added a NameVirtualHost 192.168.100.25:443 and then
in my virtual host conf file added a new virtual host with a redirect
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Stephen Goldschmidt
wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am using apache and have a Virtualhost enabled with ssl and this works
> great, using a godaddy ssl cert.
>
> my question is the certificate is only assigned to one domain name.
> www.domain.com
>
> so in my browser if i go t
2009/4/7 Clodoaldo Pinto Neto :
> 2009/4/3 André Warnier :
>> Clodoaldo Pinto Neto wrote:
>>>
>>> I want to rewrite a url to a query string like this:
>>>
>>> from http://example.com/x+ to http://example.com/var=x%2B
>>> or
>>> from http://example.com/x%2B to http://example.com/var=x%2B
>>>
>>> Usi
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 14:43 +0200, m...@bortal.de wrote:
>> Hello List,
>>
>> is there a way to build or code or make a custom HTTP Auth? The plain
>> htaccess one looks ugly and has not all the features that i want.
>>
>> Are there any alternati
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 14:43 +0200, m...@bortal.de wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> is there a way to build or code or make a custom HTTP Auth? The plain
> htaccess one looks ugly and has not all the features that i want.
>
> Are there any alternatives?
>
> Cheers,
> Mario
>
http://httpd.apache.org/d
Hello
I am using apache and have a Virtualhost enabled with ssl and this works great,
using a godaddy ssl cert.
my question is the certificate is only assigned to one domain name.
www.domain.com
so in my browser if i go to www.domain.com or domain.com the ssl certificate
works with no problem
m...@bortal.de wrote:
Hello List,
is there a way to build or code or make a custom HTTP Auth? The plain
htaccess one looks ugly and has not all the features that i want.
Are there any alternatives?
There are plenty.
First, you should have a look at the mod_auth_ modules available in
t
You can difficult it to be downloaded in massive way by automated scripts to
prevent somebody doing massive download if you want.
But, preventing the downloading and allowing it at the same time is
impossible. You have two options: allow or deny.
Allowing the download only for a certain user-agen
Hello List,
is there a way to build or code or make a custom HTTP Auth? The plain
htaccess one looks ugly and has not all the features that i want.
Are there any alternatives?
Cheers,
Mario
-
The official User-To-User suppo
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 5:32 AM, deh wrote:
>
> I wanted to setup my web pages that are on verizon.net on my local network
> with a machine running Suse 11.1/apache2. I downloaded the web pages with
> 'wget -a -k' into a directory and set the directory/root and directory for
> the apache .conf fil
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Nick Cooper
wrote:
> Yes it is possible to do with a VirtualDocumentRoot but the thing to
> remember is the value of DocumentRoot does not equal VirtualDocumentRoot.
I think it's worth emphasizing that this is a general FAQ, and not
unique to SSL.
--
Eric Cove
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Nick Cooper
wrote:
> 2009/4/8 Ed Lazor
>>
>> > Despite common quotations to the contrary, you /can/ successfully use
>> > Name-based Virtual Hosts with SSL. The caveat is that you have to use
>> > the same certificate and all the same SSL settings for all the virtu
Thanks for responding.
I am indeed using mod_proxy, but no special configuration. Only
ProxyPass settings.
Thanks,
Marius
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Prasanna Ram Venkatachalam
wrote:
> Its really wierd!
> I think 'Apache-Coyote' is the server header from Tomcat and if the header
> is from
2009/4/8 Ed Lazor
> > Despite common quotations to the contrary, you /can/ successfully use
> > Name-based Virtual Hosts with SSL. The caveat is that you have to use
> > the same certificate and all the same SSL settings for all the virtual
> > hosts, but that seems to be exactly what you're aski
46 matches
Mail list logo
