Re: [us...@httpd] Building Apache 2.2 without IPv6

2009-12-02 Thread Krist van Besien
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Daniel Reinhardt wrote: > All, > > I want to build Apache 2.2.14 without any referrence to IPv6. I have removed > IPv6 support from the Kernel, because I find it useless on a small home LAN. > > How would I tell apr to leave out IPv6 when compiling? The first quest

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache module to handle form-based Authentication

2009-12-02 Thread Peter Schober
* André Warnier [2009-12-03 00:53]: > You are also not contradicting my guess that mod_session might include a > form-based login scheme, but not explicitly confirming it either. Does > it ? Yes, http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/mod_auth_form.html -peter ---

[us...@httpd] Building Apache 2.2 without IPv6

2009-12-02 Thread Daniel Reinhardt
All, I want to build Apache 2.2.14 without any referrence to IPv6. I have removed IPv6 support from the Kernel, because I find it useless on a small home LAN. How would I tell apr to leave out IPv6 when compiling? Thanks, Daniel Reinhardt

[us...@httpd] .htaccess restricts write permission from webdav

2009-12-02 Thread J. Bakshi
Hello list, I am facing a strange problem with webdav caused by .htaccess !!! I am running debian lenny server with apache2 ` ` ` Server version: Apache/2.2.9 (Debian) Server built: Jul 14 2009 20:44:04 ` ` ` with dav and dav_fs enabled. webdav is used here to modify/publish sites in apac

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache module to handle form-based Authentication

2009-12-02 Thread André Warnier
Nick Kew wrote: On 2 Dec 2009, at 23:16, André Warnier wrote: Does someone know of a current module (internal or external to Apache itself), which offers this ? Subsidiary question : I remember from the last ApacheCON Europe in Amsterdam, that there was some talk about an Apache session mod

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache module to handle form-based Authentication

2009-12-02 Thread Nick Kew
On 2 Dec 2009, at 23:16, André Warnier wrote: > Does someone know of a current module (internal or external to Apache > itself), which offers this ? > > > Subsidiary question : I remember from the last ApacheCON Europe in Amsterdam, > that there was some talk about an Apache session module (m

[us...@httpd] Apache module to handle form-based Authentication

2009-12-02 Thread André Warnier
Hi. On the Tomcat users lists, a problem was submitted which does not have an easy solution at the Tomcat level. In the course of attempting to resolve the problem, a suggestion came up, to use an Apache httpd front-end to Tomcat, perform the authentication there, and pass the authenticated id

Re: [us...@httpd] Reverse proxying is problematic

2009-12-02 Thread André Warnier
Robert Schenck wrote: *I know this is a long read...but I really need help, and felt the best way for anyone to help me remotely is to explain the issues in their entirety. * Hello, I'm trying to set a reverse proxy, but first, some context: My office is subscribed to few academic journals. Th

Re: [us...@httpd] SSL on Apache 2.2.14

2009-12-02 Thread John J. Consolati
Finally figured this out and thought I'd put up the solution in case anyone else encounters it... Turns out the problem lies with SunStudio 11 on Solaris 9 -- there is a compiler optimization bug that doesn't compile OpenSSL properly (specifically, the AES algorithms fail the make test).

Re: [us...@httpd] util_ldap.c:43:2: error: #error mod_ldap requires APR-util to have LDAP support built in

2009-12-02 Thread Luis Clemente
Hi all, Thanks Eric, you was right. I didn't know but the third one is also required as you said. It is works. Thanks Eric and list. Cheers, Luis Clemente --- Em seg, 30/11/09, Eric Covener escreveu: > De: Eric Covener > Assunto: Re: [us...@httpd] util_ldap.c:43:2: error: #error mod_

Re: [us...@httpd] Reverse proxying is problematic

2009-12-02 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Robert Schenck wrote: >> > >> > http://paste.ubuntu.com/333080/ >> > The operative message is: [Wed Dec 02 13:21:43 2009] [error] [client 9.4.69.54] Directory index forbidden by Options directive: /srv/www/htdocs/apl/ Which would have been nice to include in-line

[us...@httpd] Client IP behind SQUID on Apache Reverse Proxy

2009-12-02 Thread Carlos André
Hi ppl, I'm getting headaches^3 coz logging in my scenario... There is: Client/HTTPS(172.16.0.101) -> SQUID/HTTPS (172.16.0.31) -> Reverse Proxy (Apache, SSL-out, 172.16.0.50) -> WebServers/HTTP (172.16.0.60) I need 2 things (for logging purposes): 1) Send IP of client to WebServers. There anywa

Re: [us...@httpd] Reverse proxying is problematic

2009-12-02 Thread Robert Schenck
Here's a snippet: http://paste.ubuntu.com/333084/ On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Tom Evans wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Robert Schenck > wrote: > > I'm get "Access Forbidden" when trying to access proxysrv1/aip and > > proxysrv1/apl > > > > This is my updated vhost file: > > > > h

Re: [us...@httpd] Reverse proxying is problematic

2009-12-02 Thread Tom Evans
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Robert Schenck wrote: > I'm get "Access Forbidden" when trying to access proxysrv1/aip and > proxysrv1/apl > > This is my updated vhost file: > > http://paste.ubuntu.com/333080/ > Your ServerName directives are not valid. When you get an 'Access Forbidden' messag

Re: [us...@httpd] Reverse proxying is problematic

2009-12-02 Thread Robert Schenck
I'm get "Access Forbidden" when trying to access proxysrv1/aip and proxysrv1/apl This is my updated vhost file: http://paste.ubuntu.com/333080/ On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Tom Evans wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Robert Schenck > wrote: > > I know this is a long read...but I re

Re: [us...@httpd] Reverse proxying is problematic

2009-12-02 Thread Eric Covener
On 12/2/09, Robert Schenck wrote: > I disable the mod_proxy_html module and the page still looked the same, > albeit without the little boxes signifying non-existent images. > > However, I also looked at the error log for the virtual host, and I found > the following: > > http://paste.ubuntu.com/3

Re: [us...@httpd] Reverse proxying is problematic

2009-12-02 Thread Robert Schenck
Peter: Well, I'm an intern so I'm supposed to be "learning"..or something like. On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Peter Schober wrote: > * Robert Schenck [2009-12-02 12:46]: > > I have to use Apache, I don't have a choice (says my employer). > > This was just meant as a heads up: depending on the

Re: [us...@httpd] Reverse proxying is problematic

2009-12-02 Thread Robert Schenck
I disable the mod_proxy_html module and the page still looked the same, albeit without the little boxes signifying non-existent images. However, I also looked at the error log for the virtual host, and I found the following: http://paste.ubuntu.com/333064/ On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Eric

Re: [us...@httpd] Reverse proxying is problematic

2009-12-02 Thread Tom Evans
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Robert Schenck wrote: > I know this is a long read...but I really need help, and felt the best way > for anyone to help me remotely is to explain the issues in their entirety. tl;dr > > Please explain any fixes in a step-by-step process. Again, I'm new to this. >

Re: [us...@httpd] Reverse proxying is problematic

2009-12-02 Thread Peter Schober
* Robert Schenck [2009-12-02 12:46]: > I have to use Apache, I don't have a choice (says my employer). This was just meant as a heads up: depending on the publisher you might have to rewrite most everything (URLs, HTML content, Cookies, JavaScript, etc.), and every publisher does things different

Re: [us...@httpd] Reverse proxying is problematic

2009-12-02 Thread Eric Covener
Is mod_proxy_html supposed to be changing those /css/ links into something else that would actually be handled by your ProxyPass? You can tell if it is by saving the source when you're actually going through the proxy. Also, 404's in your access log would be a big hint about what you're missing,

Re: [us...@httpd] Reverse proxying is problematic

2009-12-02 Thread Robert Schenck
Peter, I have to use Apache, I don't have a choice (says my employer). On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Peter Schober wrote: > * Robert Schenck [2009-12-02 12:03]: > > My office is subscribed to few academic journals. These journals verify > the > > subscription via IP, such that anyone connect

Re: [us...@httpd] Reverse proxying is problematic

2009-12-02 Thread Peter Schober
* Robert Schenck [2009-12-02 12:03]: > My office is subscribed to few academic journals. These journals verify the > subscription via IP, such that anyone connected to the internet through our > connection can access the journals. You might also want to look at EZproxy http://en.wikipedia.org/wik

[us...@httpd] Reverse proxying is problematic

2009-12-02 Thread Robert Schenck
*I know this is a long read...but I really need help, and felt the best way for anyone to help me remotely is to explain the issues in their entirety. * Hello, I'm trying to set a reverse proxy, but first, some context: My office is subscribed to few academic journals. These journals verify the

Re: [us...@httpd] how to get multiple SSL with name based vhost ?

2009-12-02 Thread Tom Evans
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:11 AM, J. Bakshi wrote: > Hello Krist, > > Thanks for your example. I have tried to implement it but as I mentioned > before whatever be the server name it always opens the site which apache > has detected as default.  Here is the output from  " apache2ctl -S" > > ` ` ` >