Re: [users@httpd] Domain Registrant's Details

2011-02-08 Thread Stephen Love
I do know that GoDaddy.com has a private/lock feature that hides details of the ownership info, but I've just never chosen to use it. Ownership transfer is simple enough, but there is usually a cost of 1 years subscription, and starts a fresh year, which means that actually you are losing the re

Re: [users@httpd] mod_headers not echoing environment variables

2011-02-08 Thread Belov, Charles
On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 03:18:00 GMT Eric Covener wrote: > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Belov, Charles wrote: >> In response to a request for the file: >> http://www.sfmta.com/cms/cmta_test/documents/3-18-08CurrentFares_test.pd >> f?abc >> with the following directive in .htaccess in the same fol

[users@httpd] Global 301 Redirects

2011-02-08 Thread Asai
Greetings, I'm trying to figure out a way to have each of my vhosts do a 301 redirect upon receiving a request which contains "www." Basically we want to drop all of those www subdomains for SEO purposes, but we are hosting dozens of websites, and would rather not have to put in a redirect o

Re: [users@httpd] PHP to control Apache

2011-02-08 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 06.02.11 23:05, Lars Nielsen wrote: >> I am writing a PHP application to control primarily my VirtualHost >> configurations in Apache(2.2.9). Can you guide my to any good knowlegde >> of >>  1. how to structure the generated config

Re: [users@httpd] incoming IP connect

2011-02-08 Thread Mike Brown
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 04:52:05PM +, Tom Evans wrote: > If you use Listen *:80, and use a hub, your apache instance will not > start responding to requests on port 80 directed to another computer > on the same hub. Seriously. Then why bother to even have a listen if it doesn't make a differen

[users@httpd] [mod_ftp] accessing root path with firefox

2011-02-08 Thread Carsten Wiedmann
Hello all, there seems to be a problem, if I try to access "ftp://localhost/"; with firefox. Access is not not possible. Instead Apache is trying to serve an index document (DirectoryIndex) or if enabled an autoindex (Options Indexes). e.g. without mod_autoindex and "DirectoryIndex none" the

Re: [users@httpd] incoming IP connect

2011-02-08 Thread Tom Evans
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Mike Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 02:00:24PM +, Tom Evans wrote: >> > Then the ethernet ports on both computers >> > would "see" IP traffic meant for each other. >> >> No. > > Ah, but that is indeed what happens.  If a hub is used, all packets are plac

Re: [users@httpd] incoming IP connect

2011-02-08 Thread Mike Brown
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 02:00:24PM +, Tom Evans wrote: > > Then the ethernet ports on both computers > > would "see" IP traffic meant for each other. > > No. Ah, but that is indeed what happens. If a hub is used, all packets are placed onto all of the jacks of the hub, therefore both compute

[users@httpd] Help with Apoache config to support Subversion

2011-02-08 Thread Arthur Pesa
Hello, I am finishing up my configuration for Apache/SVN and have one last authorization quandary. I am on Ubuntu 10.04 with LAMP, SVN and Eclipse comprising my dev environment. I have everything installed, config'd and running except the last SVN configuration for authorization. I have the Eclipse

Re: [users@httpd] PHP to control Apache

2011-02-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 06.02.11 23:05, Lars Nielsen wrote: > I am writing a PHP application to control primarily my VirtualHost > configurations in Apache(2.2.9). Can you guide my to any good knowlegde > of > 1. how to structure the generated configurationfile(s) > 2. how to reload/restart apache from PHP? mod_pe

Re: [users@httpd] incoming IP connect

2011-02-08 Thread Tom Evans
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Mike Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 12:29:00PM +, Tom Evans wrote: >> *:80 means "listen on on all addresses on all interfaces THIS BOX >> has", not "respond to every IP address in the world". Furthermore, how >> would the 'request meant for the linux s

Re: [users@httpd] LimitRequestBody and Content-Length header

2011-02-08 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > > Can anyone offer any advice on this one? > > Cheers > > > > joelittlejohn wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm try to use the LimitRequestBody directive to protect against > > clients that attempt to make request with extremely large body to > > negatively a

Re: [users@httpd] cleanest/fastest way of redirecting aliases to canonical server names

2011-02-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 29.01.11 02:38, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > I'm having a vhost, which is reachable via one canonical name, e.g. > example.org, and also via several aliases, e.g. www.example.org, > example.com, etc. > > I want that whenever requests are made via one of the aliases, that > those are redire

Re: [users@httpd] incoming IP connect

2011-02-08 Thread Eric Covener
> It is possible that the Linux box and the Windblows box could be connected > to a hub, instead of a switch.  Then the ethernet ports on both computers > would "see" IP traffic meant for each other. > > To me it would be safer not to use the wildcard. This does not impact what data normal socket

Re: [users@httpd] incoming IP connect

2011-02-08 Thread Mike Brown
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 12:29:00PM +, Tom Evans wrote: > *:80 means "listen on on all addresses on all interfaces THIS BOX > has", not "respond to every IP address in the world". Furthermore, how > would the 'request meant for the linux server' be routed to the > windows box? Not every address

Re: [users@httpd] incoming IP connect

2011-02-08 Thread Tom Evans
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Mike Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 12:11:26PM +, Tom Evans wrote: >> Apache doesn't control how packets get routed to your computer, it >> only controls what it does when they arrive. If you listen on *:80 or >> 192.168.1.2:80, then anything that can r

Re: [users@httpd] incoming IP connect

2011-02-08 Thread Mike Brown
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 12:11:26PM +, Tom Evans wrote: > Apache doesn't control how packets get routed to your computer, it > only controls what it does when they arrive. If you listen on *:80 or > 192.168.1.2:80, then anything that can route packets to that > server/port will communicate with

Re: [users@httpd] incoming IP connect

2011-02-08 Thread Mike Brown
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 01:02:18PM +0100, Alain Roger wrote: > i have a host (windows 7) on wihich i have web server with apache/PHP/MySQL. > for now this computer has IP 192.168.1.2 (for example). > on the other hand i have a linux (Fedora 14) computer with IP 192.168.1.50 > (for example) which sh

Re: [users@httpd] incoming IP connect

2011-02-08 Thread Tom Evans
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Alain Roger wrote: > Hi, > > i have a host (windows 7) on wihich i have web server with apache/PHP/MySQL. > for now this computer has IP 192.168.1.2 (for example). > on the other hand i have a linux (Fedora 14) computer with IP 192.168.1.50 > (for example) which sh

[users@httpd] incoming IP connect

2011-02-08 Thread Alain Roger
Hi, i have a host (windows 7) on wihich i have web server with apache/PHP/MySQL. for now this computer has IP 192.168.1.2 (for example). on the other hand i have a linux (Fedora 14) computer with IP 192.168.1.50 (for example) which should access to the web server via IP 192.168.1.2. except Listen