On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Edward Quick wrote:
> That hadn't even crossed my mind to be honest, and not wishing to state the
> obvious, I assume you have ServerSignature set to off.
> PCI is fundamental to most places these days. Are those compliancy checks
> carried out by a third party a
> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:45:09 -0600
> From: bmill...@gmail.com
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] using a vendor's apache
>
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 13:06:45 +
> Edward Quick wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Apache Users,
> > The place where I work is embarking on a project to
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 13:06:45 +
Edward Quick wrote:
>
> Hi Apache Users,
> The place where I work is embarking on a project to migrate custom apache
> builds to the RHEL6 build. Obviously that brings certain limitations (not
> being able to use the snazzy new Apache 2.4 version for example!!)
Hi Apache Users,
The place where I work is embarking on a project to migrate custom apache
builds to the RHEL6 build. Obviously that brings certain limitations (not being
able to use the snazzy new Apache 2.4 version for example!!) I was curious
whether anyone else had gone down this route, and
