Thanks! I wanted to ake sure Apache APR had no influence over the logging.
Yes I will aske the Tomcat group about the resolution and if they plan to
change it.
Best Regards,
-Tony
From: Rainer Jung
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, September 9, 201
On 09.09.2013 20:50, Tony Anecito wrote:
> Many Thanks. I thought I was using the APR which is the native version
> of Apache so was thinking that produced the logs I was looking at. I
> will verify the valve is turned on for for APR. If it is should I see
> milliseconds for the %D?
APR does not i
Hej Eric,
that was quite right, thanks! Inside the file called ports.conf, another
NameVirtualHost statements was hidden (from my limited knowledge).
Now, as I have removed my double statements, everything works and I do not get
any disturbing warnings anymore.
Thanks a lot,
Stefan.
Stefan P
Many Thanks. I thought I was using the APR which is the native version of
Apache so was thinking that produced the logs I was looking at. I will verify
the valve is turned on for for APR. If it is should I see milliseconds for the
%D?
Regards,
-Tony
From: Rai
Okay,... solved, and I didn't supply enough info to the list.
The problem was that this server is behind a firewall and the actual IP
is a local IP. Once I set a NameVirtualHost to the local IP, changed the
to use it, then reload the apache config.. all worked
correctly.
Thanks,
Donovan
Hi All,
I am using the Apache Realtime Plugin (APR) that comes with ApacheTomcat
7.0.33. I am using Java 7.0.5 64-bit on Windows 7 64-bit.
I have noticed in the logs that the %D looks like it gives me milliseconds when
compared to the %T seconds. For example:
%D %T
72 0.072
103 0.1
On 09.09.2013 17:35, Tony Anecito wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using the Apache Realtime Plugin (APR) that comes with ApacheTomcat
> 7.0.33. I am using Java 7.0.5 64-bit on Windows 7 64-bit.
>
> I have noticed in the logs that the %D looks like it gives me
> milliseconds when compared to the %T seco
Try with nmap , or with telnet 80
Stefan Pielmeier
from mobile device
On 9 Sep 2013, at 17:01, lists wrote:
> On 9/9/13 5:52 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 11:38 PM, lists wrote:
>>>
>>> DocumentRoot /var/www/maindomain.com/restsites
>>>
>>> DocumentRoot
On 9/9/13 5:52 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 11:38 PM, lists wrote:
DocumentRoot /var/www/maindomain.com/restsites
DocumentRoot /var/www/maindomain.com/restsites
to be root if I type "www.firstvhost.com" or "www.secondvhost.com" in the
browser. Can someon
Hi Andika,
the RP waits for the complete answer. If the backend doesn't respond you will
get an error entry in your logfile.
You can define the timeout by the directive ProxyTimeOut...
Best Regards,
Sven
From: Andika Daud [mailto:ad...@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 12:37 AM
To: us
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 11:38 PM, lists wrote:
>
> DocumentRoot /var/www/maindomain.com/restsites
>
> DocumentRoot /var/www/maindomain.com/restsites
> to be root if I type "www.firstvhost.com" or "www.secondvhost.com" in the
> browser. Can someone point me where I'm going wrong?
> [Mon Sep 09 11:05:03 2013] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no VirtualHosts
> ... waiting [Mon Sep 09 11:05:04 2013] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no
> VirtualHosts
>...done
If everything else looks good, it usually means you have 2
"NameVirtualHost *:80".
Hi,
I am courious if there are others who have the same observation in my case.
I used the Apache documentation to use name based virtual hosts.
My site-enabled file looks now like this:
--
NameVirtualHost *:80
ServerName wiki.mydomain.com
ServerAdmin webmas...@mydomain.com
13 matches
Mail list logo
