Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are some people snooping around? (all the time, actually)

--On Wednesday, November 16, 2005 10:03 AM -0600 Oil Pine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Reviewing the httpd access log, I found the following entries: 69.209.112.92 - - [16/Nov/2005:09:06:46 -0600] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 589 "-" "-" 69.209.184.151 - - [16/Nov/2005:06:38:42 -0600] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 2

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can Anyone Recommend A Log Analyzer?

AFAIK, it's an exploit attempt on an old version of awstats: But if you secure the access with passwords and per-IP rules, you will be safe... "default deny" is always a good idea. Personally, I use the analog (www.analog.cx) log analyzer (never tried aw

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Serious Memory Leak Problem

--On Friday, October 21, 2005 11:16 AM -0700 Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David Tonhofer, m-plify S.A. wrote: I really don't know what the problem could be but let's start a discussion: 1) How many children are there? 2) What is the sum of the processes RSS

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Serious Memory Leak Problem

I really don't know what the problem could be but let's start a discussion: 1) How many children are there? 2) What is the sum of the processes RSS size? 3) What is the sum of the processes VSIZE size? In other words, run this: #!/usr/bin/perl -w