[users@httpd] DAV doesn't flush data & rename stable before confirming to the client

As far as I understand the code, current DAV implementation just ask the OS to rename the ".dav" to the real destination file. Problem is... power failure/disk failure. We can lose data if we have a power failure or disk failure at the wrong time. I am experiencing this in production. I have bot

[users@httpd] Logging requests and authentication in real time, not only when the request is done.

Apache logs the access when it is done. I have a platform where a request can take several minutes to finish because the files to transfer are huge, and I would need be able to have "snapshots" of who is connected (authentication) and to which URL. I can not wait until the request is done.

Re: [users@httpd] Support for webdav QUOTA reporting

Incomplete subject, sorry. On 07/01/17 20:43, Jesus Cea wrote: > I am trying to use "Quota and Size Properties for Distributed Authoring > and Versioning (DAV) Collections" > <http://www.webdav.org/specs/rfc4331.html> in my apache webdav but after > a few tests

[users@httpd] Support for webdav

I am trying to use "Quota and Size Properties for Distributed Authoring and Versioning (DAV) Collections" in my apache webdav but after a few tests I think that Apache doesn't support space reporting. Am I right?. Any plan for it?. -- Jesús Cea Avión

[users@httpd] Interaction between "SSLStaplingResponseMaxAge" and "SSLStaplingStandardCacheTimeout"

For some unknown reason I was expecting that "SSLStaplingStandardCacheTimeout" was the OCSP polling time to the CA and "SSLStaplingResponseMaxAge" were an absolute timeout if the CA is not answering. But as far as I can tell, "SSLStaplingStandardCacheTimeout" is doing absolutelly nothing in my ser

Re: [users@httpd] mod_ossl configuration for solaris 10

On 28/04/14 15:06, Chandrasekaran, Narasimhan (VDH) wrote: > I see gcc in there .. but the make command is not invoking it .. do EXPORT CC=gcc before the "make". By default, Solaris is trying to use a non-installed compiler. Let it know you want to use GCC. Another option could be to delete you

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2.7 bit level info

On 25/04/14 22:48, Eric Covener wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:43 PM, venu thangalapally wrote: >> can you please provide more info how can i build it to 64-bit... apache 2.2 >> tar file from apache link does not say the bit level information > > The bit level is not really a property of sour

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 - non adoption reasons??

On 10/04/14 19:43, Joey J wrote: > Apache 2.4 has had a stable release out for over 2 years but is only > used by 2.5% of active Apache sites. Why is the adoption so low?? The > Apache foundation has been recommending upgrading to 2.4 for some time > and looking at the improvements I see signific

Re: [users@httpd] If-None_Match fails for gzipped content

On 08/04/14 21:29, Eric Covener wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45023 Great, thanks. This is a really old bug. Too bad. I just upgraded to 2.4.9 from 2.2.26, finally, and I am very dissapointed with this. 2.2.26 behaves finel. It is a 2.4 regression that it is hitting

[users@httpd] If-None_Match fails for gzipped content

Can anybody else reproduce this? https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56354 -- Jesús Cea Avión _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/_/ j...@jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ Twitter: @jcea_/_/_/_/