Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache benchmark in reverse proxy scenario for large Web apps

2008-07-21 Thread Sylvain Beaux
Nick Kew a écrit : On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:20:34 +0200 "Sylvain Beaux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi gays, Who??? so I calculate Max Client = 1300 Mb / (6,084 - 3660) = 540 processes, I prefered gaving some memory margin in case of ... Do you agree with this result ? Sounds

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache benchmark in reverse proxy scenario for large Web apps

2008-07-21 Thread Nick Kew
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:20:34 +0200 "Sylvain Beaux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi gays, Who??? > so I calculate Max Client = 1300 Mb / (6,084 - 3660) = 540 processes, > I prefered gaving some memory margin in case of ... > > Do you agree with this result ? Sounds like a case where Prefork is

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache benchmark in reverse proxy scenario for large Web apps

2008-07-21 Thread Sylvain Beaux
Hi gays, I'm designing a Apache as a reverse proxy using a home made perl script for cookie support. I needs some advises to design Apache as a reverse proxy for many web apps(~ 20 servers) There will be 500 users using this system 24/7. Each users will have 2 permanents HTTPS connections using

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Benchmark

2006-12-08 Thread Christiaan Lamprecht
I'm bench marking my ssl enabled web server and I keep getting this error when the request rate becomes too high: [Fri Dec 08 17:16:06 2006] [error] Re-negotiation handshake failed: Not accepted by client!? I am using Apache2, httperf (through the autobench tool) and requesting a page in a direc