Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CGI response using chunked Transfer-Encoding, Apache erroneously adding Content-Length

2005-09-06 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
André Malo wrote: * Paul Richards wrote: Hi, I'm attempting to write a CGI script response which has the Transfer-Encoding header set to "cunked". Apache is buffering the output and erroneously adding a Content-Length header which is forbidden by the HTTP spec [1]. Well, this is a bad thin

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CGI response using chunked Transfer-Encoding, Apache erroneously adding Content-Length

2005-09-04 Thread Paul Richards
Cool well I managed to get an NPH version working just fine. Thanks. :) I'm interested now as to what the official behaviour should be. Is it invalid for a non-NPH script to set Transfer-Encoding to "chunked"? The paragraph you quote from the CGI spec doesn't mention any headers in particular.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CGI response using chunked Transfer-Encoding, Apache erroneously adding Content-Length

2005-09-03 Thread André Malo
* Paul Richards wrote: > Hi, > I'm attempting to write a CGI script response which has the > Transfer-Encoding header set to "cunked". Apache is buffering the > output and erroneously adding a Content-Length header which is > forbidden by the HTTP spec [1]. Well, this is a bad thing. The CGI spe

[EMAIL PROTECTED] CGI response using chunked Transfer-Encoding, Apache erroneously adding Content-Length

2005-09-03 Thread Paul Richards
Hi, I'm attempting to write a CGI script response which has the Transfer-Encoding header set to "cunked". Apache is buffering the output and erroneously adding a Content-Length header which is forbidden by the HTTP spec [1]. Does anyone know of a way to fix this problem and generate a real chunke