Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chown -R saying it changed but didn't, effecting HTTP Apache

2008-08-11 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 08.08.08 12:48, Car54 wrote: > This is a summary of everything I've done to date... > > 1) I had to upgrade perl from 5.8.0 to 5.8.8. > > 2) Then I had problems with some of the Perl Modules calling on a problem > with mod_perl. after installing new perl version it may be good idea to reinsta

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chown -R saying it changed but didn't, effecting HTTP Apache

2008-08-08 Thread Car54
This is a summary of everything I've done to date... 1) I had to upgrade perl from 5.8.0 to 5.8.8. 2) Then I had problems with some of the Perl Modules calling on a problem with mod_perl. 3) I did a DSO mod_perl install which was successful. 4) I was able to finish installing the Perl Modules.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chown -R saying it changed but didn't, effecting HTTP Apache

2008-08-08 Thread Car54
Jacqui Caren wrote: > > In that case i will ask the other obvious question > what are the permission on the parent dir? > > could it be that without g+x/g+r apache > cannot see the tree? > > Jacqui > The permissions on the parent directory are drwxr-xr-x. This is a summary of everything I'

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chown -R saying it changed but didn't, effecting HTTP Apache

2008-08-08 Thread Car54
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > On 07.08.08 14:40, Car54 wrote: >> # chown -R apache:apache ttc >> >> drwxr-xr-x3 apache apache 4096 Jul 16 23:34 ttc >> >> chown: changing ownership of >> `/home/fum/ttc/home/fum/lib/templates/members/login.html.tt2c': Operation >> not permitted >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chown -R saying it changed but didn't, effecting HTTP Apache

2008-08-08 Thread Krist van Besien
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 08:56, Car54 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not sure why you would assume that I'm not a root user, before asking... > I am a root user. Because the error message is exactly what one would expect when a non root user tries to change ownership on a file or dir he doesn't o

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chown -R saying it changed but didn't, effecting HTTP Apache

2008-08-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 07.08.08 14:40, Car54 wrote: > # chown -R apache:apache ttc > > drwxr-xr-x3 apache apache 4096 Jul 16 23:34 ttc > > chown: changing ownership of > `/home/fum/ttc/home/fum/lib/templates/members/login.html.tt2c': Operation > not permitted where and how is this mounted? -- Matus UHL

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chown -R saying it changed but didn't, effecting HTTP Apache

2008-08-08 Thread Jacqui Caren
Car54 wrote: I'm not sure why you would assume that I'm not a root user, before asking... I am a root user. In that case i will ask the other obvious question what are the permission on the parent dir? could it be that without g+x/g+r apache cannot see the tree? Jacqui --

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chown -R saying it changed but didn't, effecting HTTP Apache

2008-08-07 Thread Car54
Krist van Besien wrote: > > Non root users are not permitted to change ownership of files. This is > an (intentional) operating system limitation. > > Krist > I'm not sure why you would assume that I'm not a root user, before asking... I am a root user. -- View this message in context: htt

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chown -R saying it changed but didn't, effecting HTTP Apache

2008-08-07 Thread Krist van Besien
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 23:40, Car54 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a software that is running on a Linux server and there was a glitch in > the install script and I was told to change ownership on this subdirectory > from root to "apache"... and for some reason it says it's changed on the >

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Chown -R saying it changed but didn't, effecting HTTP Apache

2008-08-07 Thread Car54
I have a software that is running on a Linux server and there was a glitch in the install script and I was told to change ownership on this subdirectory from root to "apache"... and for some reason it says it's changed on the subdirectory and everything below it, but as you can see below what I'm