Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Running multiple httpd daemons

2006-06-07 Thread Peter N Lewis
At 21:48 -0500 6/6/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: apachectl should not change significantly, why not just leave it alone between minor subversion bumps? That's true, and I could just copy apachectl twice, configure both and then hope nothing changes, but it disturbs me to copy something out

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Running multiple httpd daemons

2006-06-07 Thread David Salisbury
OTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 8:29 PM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Running multiple httpd daemons On my server, I run the httpd daemon twice, using almost identical httpd.conf files, one on the main port (the live server) and one on a high numbered port (my working draft). Then I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Running multiple httpd daemons

2006-06-06 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
apachectl should not change significantly, why not just leave it alone between minor subversion bumps? Peter N Lewis wrote: On my server, I run the httpd daemon twice, using almost identical httpd.conf files, one on the main port (the live server) and one on a high numbered port (my working dra

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Running multiple httpd daemons

2006-06-06 Thread Peter N Lewis
On my server, I run the httpd daemon twice, using almost identical httpd.conf files, one on the main port (the live server) and one on a high numbered port (my working draft). Then I edit the files/configuration of the working draft server, restarting it as necessary. When all changes are in