On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:48:26PM -0400, George Adams wrote:
> Joe, I just wanted to thank you again. The byterange patch you gave me
> worked just beautifully.
Great, thanks for the feedback. I've proposed this for backport to the
2.0.x branch now so it should show up in a 2.0.x release even
Joe, I just wanted to thank you again. The byterange patch you gave me
worked just beautifully.
Once I understood what the problem was, I was able to test it more
thoroughly. I took a copy of Star Downloader and configured it to split up
a single file into 10 chunks for faster downloading.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:12:05PM -0400, George Adams wrote:
> >> Joe> Are these all simple static files, or is /out/ handled by some CGI
> >> Joe> script etc?
> >>
> >> Joe, you're right - they do get passed through a Perl script for
> >> processing. However, unless I'm mistaken, I don't THINK t
> Joe> Are these all simple static files, or is /out/ handled by some CGI
> Joe> script etc?
>
> Joe, you're right - they do get passed through a Perl script for
> processing. However, unless I'm mistaken, I don't THINK the following
> code would produce the kind of problems I'm seeing:
OK, no,
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:00:02AM -0400, George Adams wrote:
> Thanks, Joe and Jon for your helpful thoughts regarding my Apache
> memory problem. Here's some more information:
>
> Joe> > 1-015823W 0.001742573500GET /out/388.mp3
> Joe> > 2-0 15824 W 0.00 1742573499 GET /out/2
Thanks, Joe and Jon for your helpful thoughts regarding my Apache
memory problem. Here's some more information:
Joe> > 1-015823W 0.001742573500GET /out/388.mp3
Joe> > 2-0 15824 W 0.00 1742573499 GET /out/238.mp3
Joe>
Joe> Are these all simple static files, or is /out/ handled
George,
I have something similar...
I have been debugging an issue where I have seen processes growing to 800Mb on
a forward proxy configuration using the worker model. Perhaps interestingly
on reverse proxy configurations I get 100% CPU states occasionally as well.
What I have noticed is that
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:05:49AM -0400, George Adams wrote:
> I have an Apache 2.0.54 server on a Gentoo Linux (2.6.11) box which has
> 1Gig RAM and an additional 1Gig swap space. The server handles a lot of
> people downloading sermons from our church website (which are no larger
> than 18Me
I read an earlier thread on memory consumption (http://tinyurl.com/bly4d),
which may be related to my problem... but because of some differences, I'm
not so sure. Any help would be appreciated!
I have an Apache 2.0.54 server on a Gentoo Linux (2.6.11) box which has 1Gig
RAM and an additional
