Re: [us...@httpd] Proposal to Optionally Block DNS

2009-08-24 Thread J. Greenlees
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: > I propose this upgrade to Apache: > > Options +NoDNS > > Prevents Apache from initiating DNS activity for > any reason. > > I am now running my server with all DNS blocked > by iptables. Performance is thereby substantially > improved. Fortunately, I usually do

Re: [us...@httpd] Proposal to Optionally Block DNS

2009-08-24 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Tom Evans wrote: > On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 00:31 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: >> I propose this upgrade to Apache: >> >>   Options +NoDNS > > I think your mailer dropped your patch, can you resend? golf-clapping this one. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com -

Re: [us...@httpd] Proposal to Optionally Block DNS

2009-08-24 Thread Tom Evans
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 00:31 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: > I propose this upgrade to Apache: > > Options +NoDNS > > Prevents Apache from initiating DNS activity for > any reason. > > I am now running my server with all DNS blocked > by iptables. Performance is thereby substantially > i

[us...@httpd] Auto response - re:[us...@httpd] Proposal to Optionally Block DNS [pfCase:1073239, pfTicket:10099537]

2009-08-22 Thread cs-journals
pfTicket: 10099537 Dear Customer, Thank you for your enquiry. This is an automatic reply to acknowledge receipt of your recent e-mail. We have received your email and tracking number is noted in this auto reply. Our customer services team will respond to your enquiry. If you require an immedi

[us...@httpd] Proposal to Optionally Block DNS

2009-08-22 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
I propose this upgrade to Apache: Options +NoDNS Prevents Apache from initiating DNS activity for any reason. I am now running my server with all DNS blocked by iptables. Performance is thereby substantially improved. Fortunately, I usually don't need DNS for anything else on that box. Mike