Doh, that explains a couple of things.
Thanks for the link!
Nico
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 18:22 +0200, Bob Ionescu wrote:
> 2009/9/16 Nico De Ranter :
> > however the 'require' directive doesn't seem to have any effect anymore?
>
> You're overriding it with your definition. A location
> section
2009/9/16 Nico De Ranter :
> however the 'require' directive doesn't seem to have any effect anymore?
You're overriding it with your definition. A location
section overrides directives placed in .htaccess files, see
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/sections.html#mergin
Bob
-
One more note: I grepped all the apache config files for
'allowoverride': all of them are either 'All' or 'None' (in which case
garbage in .htaccess shouldn't result in a server error as it won't be
read at all). So I'm sure .htaccess is read and no allowoverride
statement keeps me from using 'r
Hmm,
following the troubleshooting section on
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/howto/htaccess.html I put some garbage
in the .htaccess and got a server error. So the .htaccess is read,
however the 'require' directive doesn't seem to have any effect anymore?
Nico
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 17:10 +020
Hi,
I recently enabled access control on all folders of my apache server by
adding the following section:
AuthzLDAPAuthoritative off
AuthBasicProvider ldap
AuthType Basic
...
Require valid-user
The idea is that I can refine this for every folder by adding some
