On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Viaduct Productions
wrote:
> Sure. I'll make it dead simple for you: Why does this happen?
>
> sh-3.2# apachectl -S
> [Tue Apr 14 04:53:49 2009] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no VirtualHosts
> VirtualHost configuration:
> wildcard NameVirtualHosts and _default
Viaduct Productions wrote:
On 14-Apr-09, at 11:38 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
httpd -S and mod_info are your friends in these sorts of issues.
Yes, I've been chasing up the issue found in apachectl -S since using
it. That's what the thread is focussing on now.
Ok, there we are touch
Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On Apr 14, 2009, at 06:19, Viaduct Productions wrote:
>
> > Or would you rather me ask a question that doesn't shed light on issues?
> > Kind of like "only behave the way we wish"? Then why have a list? You
> > want approval? Get a dog. I'm here because things are not
On Apr 14, 2009, at 06:19, Viaduct Productions wrote:
Or would you rather me ask a question that doesn't shed light on
issues? Kind of like "only behave the way we wish"? Then why have
a list? You want approval? Get a dog. I'm here because things are
not clear. Yes, it's a list for u
On 14-Apr-09, at 11:38 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
httpd -S and mod_info are your friends in these sorts of issues.
Yes, I've been chasing up the issue found in apachectl -S since using
it. That's what the thread is focussing on now.
Rich in Toronto
...now go get on your bike
-
Viaduct Productions wrote:
>
> On 14-Apr-09, at 8:18 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
>
>>> [Tue Apr 14 06:05:15 2009] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no
>>> VirtualHosts
>>>
>>
>> Which does NOT say "Apache has no vhosts". You may be misunderstanding
>> what the message says.
>
> May, may not, perhaps...he
Mac OS X Leopard Client. It automatically starts up, as configured in
Sys Prefs.
Apache 2.2.9
Unfortunately I cannot find any init.d anywhere. Apple changed to
xinetd and I can't find that either. I don't know where to look for
this. I put a message out on another list, so if I find an
Viaduct Productions wrote:
On 14-Apr-09, at 9:45 AM, André Warnier wrote:
a) a first "NameVirtualHost *:80" somewhere,
and then
b) a second "NameVirtualHost *:80" line, without having seen
in-between, sections that would correspond to the first
"NameVirtualHost *:80".
So it warns you that
On 14-Apr-09, at 9:45 AM, André Warnier wrote:
a) a first "NameVirtualHost *:80" somewhere,
and then
b) a second "NameVirtualHost *:80" line, without having seen in-
between, sections that would correspond to the first
"NameVirtualHost *:80".
So it warns you that something is missing there
Viaduct Productions wrote:
[...]
As much as by now the subject has become inappropriate, if you change it
in the middle, it becomes very hard for people to follow.
So I'll restore the original one.
By marking [OT], I was talking about the other discussion about how bad
Apache and the documentat
On 14-Apr-09, at 8:18 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
[Tue Apr 14 06:05:15 2009] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no
VirtualHosts
Which does NOT say "Apache has no vhosts". You may be misunderstanding
what the message says.
May, may not, perhaps...hence the request for documentation.
2. 13 virtua
Viaduct Productions wrote:
I'm using wildcard *:80, for both NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost
entries, and I only have one NVH. I've checked many times, thinking I
tripped over something.
For the other part of the discussion, I suggest prefixing the subject
with [OT] (marking as "off topic".
On 14-Apr-09, at 8:14 AM, Jacqui Caren wrote:
This is whining - it gets you nowhere. Apache httpd has excellent
documentation
and you can purchase some rather good books as well.
Your opinion. My opinion is what I posted. If things were unclear as
I suggested, then other members' posts
On 14-Apr-09, at 8:15 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
I have no idea what this is in reply to. All I've said in this thread
is that the users list is not required as you asserted.
Note that If you choose not to avail yourself of the users list, you
obviously can't just move your usage questions over t
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 07:29 -0400, Viaduct Productions wrote:
> On 14-Apr-09, at 7:00 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
>
> > I'm slightly confused, as the thread title says 'LocationMatch inside
> > VirtualHost', which doesn't seem related?
>
> When I inserted the LocationMatch inside the VirtualHost directi
Viaduct Productions wrote:
On 14-Apr-09, at 7:15 AM, André Warnier wrote:
It is maybe worth remembering that you get this software for free, as
you are getting assistance for free on this users list. It is always
an option to pay someone to offer you personal and tailored assistance
and trai
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Viaduct Productions
wrote:
>
> On 14-Apr-09, at 7:42 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
>> Not at all, my statement had nothing to do with documentation or
>> feedback. You removed the asinine statement I was replying to:
>>
>>> It would be in everybody's interest if the w
On 14-Apr-09, at 7:42 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
Not at all, my statement had nothing to do with documentation or
feedback. You removed the asinine statement I was replying to:
It would be in everybody's interest if the whole system didn't
require users to come to the users list. It's not lik
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Viaduct Productions
wrote:
>
> On 14-Apr-09, at 7:29 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
>> It's not required. You can join IRC, phone a friend, pay for
>> commercial support, or figure it out on your own.
>
> Or ask on a list. Hence the question.
>
> So you openly admit th
On 14-Apr-09, at 7:29 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
It's not required. You can join IRC, phone a friend, pay for
commercial support, or figure it out on your own.
Or ask on a list. Hence the question.
So you openly admit there are shortcomings in the documentation and
feedback. That's why peop
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Viaduct Productions
wrote:
> It would be in everybody's interest if the whole system didn't require users
> to come to the users list. It's not like I don't have things to do, as I'm
> assuming yourselves as well.
It's not required. You can join IRC, phone a fri
On 14-Apr-09, at 7:00 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
I'm slightly confused, as the thread title says 'LocationMatch inside
VirtualHost', which doesn't seem related?
When I inserted the LocationMatch inside the VirtualHost directive, I
was getting errors as reported.
Observation (again, making it
On 14-Apr-09, at 7:15 AM, André Warnier wrote:
It is maybe worth remembering that you get this software for free,
as you are getting assistance for free on this users list. It is
always an option to pay someone to offer you personal and tailored
assistance and training.
You know, this i
I'm using wildcard *:80, for both NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost
entries, and I only have one NVH. I've checked many times, thinking I
tripped over something.
On 14-Apr-09, at 7:24 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
The warning usuallu means you have more then one "nameVirtualHost
*:80". It shoul
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Viaduct Productions
wrote:
> [Tue Apr 14 04:53:49 2009] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no VirtualHosts
> VirtualHost configuration:
> wildcard NameVirtualHosts and _default_ servers:
> *:80 is a NameVirtualHost
> So 0 == 13. Also, 0 == 13 is
Viaduct Productions wrote:
On 14-Apr-09, at 4:57 AM, André Warnier wrote:
So would you like to try again ?
Sure. I'll make it dead simple for you: Why does this happen?
sh-3.2# apachectl -S
[Tue Apr 14 04:53:49 2009] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no VirtualHosts
VirtualHost configuratio
I'm slightly confused, as the thread title says 'LocationMatch inside
VirtualHost', which doesn't seem related?
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 06:19 -0400, Viaduct Productions wrote:
> On 14-Apr-09, at 4:57 AM, André Warnier wrote:
>
> > So would you like to try again ?
>
>
> Sure. I'll make it dead si
On 14-Apr-09, at 4:57 AM, André Warnier wrote:
So would you like to try again ?
Sure. I'll make it dead simple for you: Why does this happen?
sh-3.2# apachectl -S
[Tue Apr 14 04:53:49 2009] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no
VirtualHosts
VirtualHost configuration:
wildcard NameVirtualHo
Viaduct Productions wrote:
OK I found the culprit.
Who do I report a bug to? It seems including a file with same
permissions inside the users/ directory, won't work.
Even if you include it right after the extra/httpd-vhosts.conf file with
the very same syntax, it won't work.
There's nothi
OK I found the culprit.
Who do I report a bug to? It seems including a file with same
permissions inside the users/ directory, won't work.
Even if you include it right after the extra/httpd-vhosts.conf file
with the very same syntax, it won't work.
There's nothing in the documentation, o
30 matches
Mail list logo
