On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Esmond Pitt wrote:
> I haven't been told that at all actually. I have been trying to extract
> precisely that information, from a lot of people who seem churlish in the
> extreme at actually answering questions. This latest insult is entirely
> typical. It's a sim
pache HTTP Server 2.4.x for Windows?
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 13:01 +, Sharpe, G wrote:
I think what Eric is getting at is that the Apache Foundation doesn't
provide any *official* win32 binaries - the ones that are available for
download are actually ones done by a community member and the
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 13:20 +, Lester Caine wrote:
> Since most people using Linux will probably have all the packages handled by
> their distribution,
True, albeit mostly outdated, as far as I know, only Slackware and
Gentoo keep mostly up to date, as neither butcher httpd.
It's also a
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 13:01 +, Sharpe, G wrote:
> I think what Eric is getting at is that the Apache Foundation doesn't provide
> any *official* win32 binaries - the ones that are available for download are
> actually ones done by a community member and then merely hosted on the
> foundatio
Sharpe, G wrote:
I think what Eric is getting at is that the Apache Foundation doesn't provide
any*official* win32 binaries - the ones that are available for download are
actually ones done by a community member and then merely hosted on the
foundations website.
Presumably the lack of 2.4 bin
topic seem
>to me to have been summarily dismissed as irrelevant complaints. A proper
>answer seems merited.
>
>EJP
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2012 10:58 PM
>To: users@httpd.apache.org
>Sub
Re: [users@httpd] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.x for Windows?
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Esmond Pitt
wrote:
> Thanks but that doesn't answer my question. I asked: 'is this a policy
> change?'
No.
-
To unsu
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Esmond Pitt wrote:
> Thanks but that doesn't answer my question. I asked: 'is this a policy
> change?'
No.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-
n
downloading Apache 2 Windows binaries direct from the project for about ten
years.
EJP
-Original Message-
From: Tom Evans [mailto:tevans...@googlemail.com ]
Sent: Thursday, 13 December 2012 11:31 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.x for Win
pache 2 Windows binaries direct from the project for about ten
> years.
>
> EJP
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Evans [mailto:tevans...@googlemail.com ]
> Sent: Thursday, 13 December 2012 11:31 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apach
users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.x for Windows?
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Ben Johnson wrote:
> The Apache Software Foundation does not provide Windows binaries. You
> must compile the software from source (no simple matter on Windows) or
> o
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Ben Johnson wrote:
> The Apache Software Foundation does not provide Windows binaries. You
> must compile the software from source (no simple matter on Windows) or
> obtain binaries from a third party. Apache Lounge is the best known
> source for such binaries: htt
On 12/11/2012 10:23 AM, Handy, Molly CTR DISA PEO-MA wrote:
> All,
>
>
>
> Hello. Forgive my unfamiliarity with Apache but I have a question
> regarding Apache HTTP Server 2.4.x for Windows. We currently have
> version 2.2.22 running on Windows 2008 R2. I reviewed the download page
> and rele
All,
Hello. Forgive my unfamiliarity with Apache but I have a question regarding
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.x for Windows. We currently have version 2.2.22
running on Windows 2008 R2. I reviewed the download page and release
statements concerning the 2.4.3 version but I did not see a release
statem
14 matches
Mail list logo
