On September 27, 2011 12:50 , Steve Foster
wrote:
anyone? cheers..
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Steve Foster
mailto:stephenfoster1...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
i've also had a thought, I also implemented the following:
LimitRequestLine 4000
Which is about half
anyone? cheers..
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Steve Foster wrote:
> All,
>
> did anyone have any thoughts or opinions on this?
>
> cheers
>
> Steve
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Steve Foster <
> stephenfoster1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> i've also had a thought, I also implemented the f
All,
did anyone have any thoughts or opinions on this?
cheers
Steve
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Steve Foster
wrote:
> i've also had a thought, I also implemented the following:
>
> LimitRequestLine 4000
>
> Which is about half of the default size i beleive, could this be limiting
> the im
i've also had a thought, I also implemented the following:
LimitRequestLine 4000
Which is about half of the default size i beleive, could this be limiting
the impact on my servers and thus not making them vulnerable.
Does anyone know what length of request the killapache script sends?
cheers
S
Correction , the static file gives a 206 status code...
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Steve Foster
wrote:
> Hi eric,
>
> yes i have tried it on a static file as well and no issues., obviously the
> static file gives a 200 status code back in the logs, but i am still sending
> the Range header
Hi eric,
yes i have tried it on a static file as well and no issues., obviously the
static file gives a 200 status code back in the logs, but i am still sending
the Range header as per the kill script.
Steve
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
> When you changes the resource
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Steve Foster
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>>
>>
>> It's tuff baked into the core binary, httpd. Note that many dynamic
>> responses can't be satisfied as range requests, so maybe your "/" is
>> such a response.
>
> Hi eric,
>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
>
> It's tuff baked into the core binary, httpd. Note that many dynamic
> responses can't be satisfied as range requests, so maybe your "/" is
> such a response.
>
Hi eric,
sorry i was referring to the compiled-in modules, e.g:
Compiled i
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Steve Foster
wrote:
> hi there,
>
> I have multiple versions of Apache, all built with minimal inclusions of
> modules in the core binary , they don't exhibit the memory consumption issue
> when attacked with the killapache script, they all run happily for hours
>
hi there,
I have multiple versions of Apache, all built with minimal inclusions of
modules in the core binary , they don't exhibit the memory consumption issue
when attacked with the killapache script, they all run happily for hours
with no resource issues.
Does anyone know which particular modul
10 matches
Mail list logo