Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Windows - PHP Failure - NO Restart

2007-08-14 Thread Victor Trac
Sorry, I'm only familiar with what happens on the linux side of things. What happens on Windows may be different, but if it helps, mod_php will cause apache processes to segmentation fault after a random amount of load (usually after 2-3 days). At this point, anything that apache sends off to php

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Windows - PHP Failure - NO Restart

2007-08-14 Thread Stephen Johnston
Victor, Just to be clear. Are you saying they all end up crashing Apache, or causing Aache not to gracefully recover from crashes? There are two issues here and I'd like to know for which FastCGI is a typical solution. We've already been investigating fcgid as an option. -Stephen On 8/13/07, Vi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Windows - PHP Failure - NO Restart

2007-08-13 Thread Victor Trac
On 8/13/07, Stephen Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Greetings, > > We have an Apache 2.0.59 server on Windows 2003 running PHP 5.2.3. We are > also running eaccelerator. Sometimes, PHP faults and brings down Apache with > it. Considering this happens a few times a week, it's not the end of

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Windows

2007-03-07 Thread matt farey
Nathan Kellogg wrote: > > > Does this mean that an XP box running Apache would be limited to 10 > concurrent web browser users? My impression of this was that the > connection limit only applied to the Windows Network connections and > not to http/https/etc... if you don't patch the tcp stack,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Windows

2007-03-07 Thread Nathan Kellogg
Does this mean that an XP box running Apache would be limited to 10 concurrent web browser users? My impression of this was that the connection limit only applied to the Windows Network connections and not to http/https/etc... In fact it is metered by NTLM authentication, if you loade

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Windows

2007-03-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Arthur Kreitman wrote: > One caution for Apache on XP. The licensing for XP limits you to 10 > simultaneous incoming tcp connections. Of course that's the word of the license. Obviously 'what's a connection' is always interesting, you end up with far more than 10 connections using email/web

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Windows

2007-03-07 Thread Arthur Kreitman
One caution for Apache on XP. The licensing for XP limits you to 10 simultaneous incoming tcp connections. > -Original Message- > From: Paul Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 10:33 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Windows

2007-03-07 Thread Paul Simon
I've been running apache on windows (2003, 2000, XP) for the last 4 years. One server is for proxying (mod_proxy and OpenSSL) and the other is for running php apps. The servers get about 5000 visitors daily. There haven't been any serious issues. My experience is that it's more challenging runn

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Windows

2007-03-07 Thread Schultz, Gary - COMM
Run it on Windows Server 2003 and XP with no real issues. Use with OpenSSL and PHP. Good resources to use for Apache on Windows can be found at: http://hunter.campbus.com/ http://www.apachelounge.com/ Gary T. Schultz IT Administrator

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Windows

2007-03-06 Thread Vince Bravdica
matt farey wrote: Vince Bravdica wrote: Randall Fox wrote: Hello, I am wondering if any of you use Apache on Windows, and if so what your experience has been like so far. Thanks, RL. Fox. *_Internet E-mail Disclaimer_ * This message contains confidential information and is inte

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Windows

2007-03-06 Thread matt farey
Vince Bravdica wrote: > Randall Fox wrote: >> >> Hello, I am wondering if any of you use Apache on Windows, and if so >> what your experience has been like so far. >> >> >> >> Thanks, RL. Fox. >> >> >> *_Internet E-mail Disclaimer_ * >> This message contains confidential information and is in

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Windows

2007-03-06 Thread Vince Bravdica
Randall Fox wrote: Hello, I am wondering if any of you use Apache on Windows, and if so what your experience has been like so far. Thanks, RL. Fox. *_Internet E-mail Disclaimer_ * This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Windows

2007-03-06 Thread matt farey
truly wonderful, those apache guys and gals are great. latest apache with mod_security2 with php, perl, python (...) modules on win pro hundreds of thousands of requests per day, complex apps, hundreds of vhosts, no issues whatsoever, uptime is great, (no abnormal crashes ever) (which I think i

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Windows

2007-03-06 Thread Steve Swift
I have a very light-weight server running under Windows at http://swiftys.org.uk The homepage leads nowhere, and I don't advertise the pages on this site. I use it for CGI scripting and demonstration pages, by invitation only. Overall I'm very happy with it. It doesn't restart cleanly from the con

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Windows with Active Directory Authentication

2006-07-18 Thread Ashutosh Mohanty
Hi,   the setting looks fine ,as per error log what you given, its saying the problem is to access  ldap's user informations, first just try with   (objectClass=*)   you can test with ip-address also like, ldap://x.x.x.x:389/    Ashutosh SynaptiCAD         - Original Message - F