Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain

2007-10-15 Thread solprovider
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > Envoyé : lundi 15 octobre 2007 15:06 > À : users@httpd.apache.org > Objet : Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain > > Distinguishing between FQDN and Domain is barely relevant wh

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain

2007-10-15 Thread Axel-Stephane SMORGRAV
d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : lundi 15 octobre 2007 15:06 À : users@httpd.apache.org Objet : Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain Distinguishing between FQDN and Domain is barely relevant when discu

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain

2007-10-15 Thread solprovider
Distinguishing between FQDN and Domain is barely relevant when discussing Cookies. RFC2965 states, "Domain Defaults to the request-host." Cookies default to using the FQDN as the Domain if the Domain is not specified. Specified domains must start with a period, must be exactly one level below th

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain

2007-10-15 Thread Axel-Stephane SMORGRAV
The behaviour observed by the original poster is correct: www.example.com is the host FQDN - not the domain. The cookie _domain_ is example.com. A cookie which domain is example.com will be submitted by the UA to both www1.example.com and www.example.com. The conclusion is that no rewriting of

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain

2007-10-02 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain does not change the cookie name - only the domain field of the cookie. Use LiveHTTPHeaders on Mozilla or similar (like Ethereal, burpproxy...) to see exactly what the browser receives (Set-Cookie header) and what it subsequently sends to the server in terms of cook