RE: [users@httpd] A curious thing - apachectl status in Apache 2.4.25

2017-05-15 Thread Jeff Cauhape
tration > -Original Message- > From: Jeff Cauhape [mailto:jpcauh...@nvdetr.org] > Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 16:22 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: RE: [users@httpd] A curious thing - apachectl status in > Apache 2.4.25 > > EXTERNAL EMAIL > > > Eric,

RE: [users@httpd] A curious thing - apachectl status in Apache 2.4.25

2017-05-15 Thread Houser, Rick
ape [mailto:jpcauh...@nvdetr.org] > Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 16:22 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: RE: [users@httpd] A curious thing - apachectl status in Apache 2.4.25 > > EXTERNAL EMAIL > > > Eric, > > Yes, I went from 2.4.6 bundled with Red Hat to

RE: [users@httpd] A curious thing - apachectl status in Apache 2.4.25

2017-05-15 Thread Jeff Cauhape
re are none, it echoes "It's DEAD, Jim!". Otherwise It echoes "It's ALIVE!!!". That seems pretty clear. Jeff -Original Message- From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 10:24 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users

Re: [users@httpd] A curious thing - apachectl status in Apache 2.4.25

2017-05-15 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Jeff Cauhape wrote: > In the Apache 2.4.6 shell script apachectl, a call to “apachectl status” > > invokes systemctl status httpd.service. This gives you easy-to-read > > output regardless if the server is running or not. Did you go from a vendor package to a sou